search results matching tag: Bill Nye

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds

    Videos (125)     Sift Talk (2)     Blogs (40)     Comments (320)   

darkrowan (Member Profile)

Sir Isaac Newton vs Bill Nye. Epic Rap Battles of History

Top Five Times Fox News Is Debunked "On Air" by a Guest

Top Five Times Fox News Is Debunked "On Air" by a Guest

Top Five Times Fox News Is Debunked "On Air" by a Guest

Top Five Times Fox News Is Debunked "On Air" by a Guest

MichaelL says...

Damn this the funniest thing I've seen in a long time..

"That's...what...I...do...for...a...living...actually..."
LMFAO at how he speaks slowly for the benefit of the dim-witted Fox anchor.

Bill Nye... looks completely bumfuzzled at how to respond to the inane comments re volanoes on the moon and global warming on freakin' earth.

Even Pat Robertson Attacks Young Earth Theory As A "Joke"

Grimm says...

Yeah, except you're wrong here. Are there some Atheists who "insist that there can't be" a God/gods? Sure, I suppose....but that's not requirement.

Do you believe in a God/gods? If the answer is NO then you are an atheist. I don't know of many atheists that "insist that there can't be" one....just that there is no evidence that convinces them that there is one.

Like Bill Nye said in the debate....what would make him change his mind? Evidence.

JustSaying said:

See, this is a good example why I wouldn't consider myself an atheist. Just like the religious folk out there insist they know that god exists atheist insist that there can't be one.

wormwood (Member Profile)

Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham: is creationism a viable model?

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from 'creationism, science, bill nye, ken ham' to 'creationism, science, bill nye, ken ham, Historical, Observational' - edited by Sagemind

Bill Nye Debates Ken Ham: is creationism a viable model?

Science With Reggie Watts

Bill Nye the Science Guy Dispels Poverty Myths

pensword says...

I like Bill Nye. But this whole argument treats 'Africa' (as only one example of a region of the underdeveloped and exploited world) as the nebulous hell-region where bad things happen. He cites examples of these bad things, but then, in a characteristically bourgeois fashion, he focuses on the consumptive problems (not enough aid, not enough to eat, no enough medicine, etc). And who is responsible for this? The first-world, capitalist zones of power (the US, Europe, 'civilization', etc).

Why don't we actually look at the production-side of things. Why can't Africa produce its own resources? It once was able to, very efficiently and without problems. That is, until imperialism happened. We are taking about a continent that was broken up into artificial nations, where agriculture was transformed into cash crops, where millions were shipped off as slave labor. We are talking about a continent that has tried for hundreds of years to fight for liberation for itself, only to have these imperialist countries keep their stranglehold on its neck.

(go wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrice_Lumumba
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Am%C3%ADlcar_Cabral
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Sankara

My point here is that the whole discussion of more or less foreign aid presupposes an Africa that cannot feed itself. The solution is not to continue a dependent relationship. The solution is a sustainable and liberated Africa, who has economic control over her resources, and political freedom for her own people. the solution is self-determination, not should the US try to feed more of the kids? (whose starvation is rooted in the US's wealth. )

/end rant

Bill Nye the Science Guy Dispels Poverty Myths

bcglorf says...

I hate to get on Bill Nye, and I agree with the need for more foreign aid even. I must protest non the less about war being a minor factor in poverty and related deaths. Blaming the millions that die of starvation and malnutrition in Africa on that alone is little different than saying that the millions who starved under Stalin and Mao could have been saved by foreign aid.

Even when there isn't active warfare in the most poverty ridden places of the world, there are warlords and criminals ruling the region through starvation and actively redirecting what little foreign aid there is to themselves and away from those that do not support them. Simply sending more food and money to places like Somalia or North Korea does nothing to help the people there, and if the aid is naively sent blind to whomever holds power it actually makes things WORSE by strengthening the very monsters responsible for the suffering. I'd like to believe our apathy here is the biggest problem as much as the next guy, but the reality is that there are also people local to the problem involved first hand in perpetuating and profiting from human suffering. If we refuse to admit that there are instances were 'aid' necessarily takes the form of shooting the bad guys then we are doomed to watching as the next genocide plays out, as we did for the Rwandan Tutsis, Iraqi Kurds and Shias and countless others.

pierrekrahn (Member Profile)

Bill Nye Sets the Record Straight on Astrology



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon