Welfare Check = Baby

Makes sense to me

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Etheral love sound baby making bottom of the sea Stevie nicks Deepdish remix' to 'Etheral, Stevie nicks, Deep dish, remix, 00s, reverse, cups, nocturnal' - edited by Eklek

Tags for this video have been changed from 'parody, baby baby baby, make the girl dance, music steve, viral' to 'parody, baby baby baby, make the girl dance, music steve, viral, guitar hero' - edited by EDD

>> ^Doc_M:
>> There is as I understand it a waiting list for people in the US to adopt newborn babies who are up for adoption. Think about it. If you were wanting a child and you could not have one for some unfortunate genetic or other reason, you'd want still to raise a child from infancy wouldn't you?

That kind of sounds like a plea to turn women with unwanted pregnancies into handy-dandy baby making machines.


Basically most completely infertile couples who wish to raise a child want an infant. And I don't doubt that if you told them "if you don't take this child it will be aborted," most of them would jump to and do many things to get the child. Most Americans (at least) by statistics don't like the idea of abortion and would like to raise an infant who would otherwise be so aborted.

I'd like to see your source on that. Last I heard, Americans were about 6.5 to 3.5 in favor of keeping abortion legal.

If you don't like abortion, don't have one.

Sniper007, the only reason we had all the wealth that we wiped out in this financial crisis was because we've been growing our economies at a steady rate throughout the modern period.

That growth is based on technological innovation... railroads, medicine, computers, the internet. They're all "unnecessary" and "unnatural," but they make workers in most areas of the economy able to generate more labor than was achievable in past generations.

Some of the growth is based on population growth, but each new baby makes our non-renewable resources a little more expensive, and so increasing population, especially after a certain point, starts to be a very mixed bag, unlike e.g. increasing our understanding of physics, engineering, and biology.

My brother just had a son, about two weeks ago. He's so happy he even brags about changing diapers. Every little nuance that the baby makes, my brother notes mentally. The clutch of a little fist. The sour distain on the boy's tiny lips. His uncanny habit of pissing with super-human accuracy.

I'm lovingly jealous, of course. Aside from the diaper part of things.

It must be nice to have a little piece of you in the world.

Even if CaptainPlanet's way of putting it is annoying and patronizing, doesn't he have a point about natural selection? Man+man or Woman+woman does not a baby make. I suppose you could, rightly, argue that homosexuality is not genetic, but then the argument that "it doesn't matter how you raised them" falls flat, it's either nature or nurture.

hahaha baby-making man gravy

ahhhh the myth that the word "liberal" actually has a consistent meaning to more than 3 people at the same time.

and yes, if the media was "liberal" then there would be less lewinsky. it's fucking obvious that the "liberal" media slept while iraq burned.

vermeulen is right.. the media doesn't have a political alliance, it has a financial alliance to stuff that makes money. and it just so happens that right wing shit like outing homosexuals and killing iraqi babies makes more money, so that's what they show. And the sheeple continue to feel like they actually have their own opinion.

And still everyone hates FOX unless they show the simpsons, which they would BAN if it didn't make so much money in merchandising. Follow the money. Politics doesn't matter to the money guys.

The only problem I have with withholding information from children is that it really does stunt their growth. While, to most people it may not seem stunted, but that's only because they're so used to the status quo and overall ignorance.

For instance, the absolute best example is baby talk. People seem to think it's cute that the babies make these funny noises so they make them back. Well, kids learn through imitation so guess what! The kid thinks that's what it's supposed to do. A kid can actually learn to speak at a surprisingly young age if given the chance. The way to do that is always talk to them as an adult. If you don't use the words, they'll never learn the words.

The same goes for gender identification. When looking at a baby, you can't tell what sex it is unless you can see the genitals. But, tell someone it's a girl and they say how cute and pretty she is or that's she'll be a heart-breaker. Tell them it's a boy, and you get he's handsome and he's going to grow up to be a strong man. It's all BS of course, cause if you told them the wrong gender, they'll start saying that anyways. But the sad part is, just like with language and anything else thought, the sooner you start them, the stronger the impression. False gender identifications such as such are the main source of indoctrination that plagues our society as it is.

So yes, I am all for telling kids everything from the start. The more information, the higher the level of information, the better. Start a kid playing music when they can first press the keys of a piano will ingrain that way of thought more profoundly than first exposing them to music when they're 20.

"....seeeee, watchin' cute babies makes y' wanna' fuck and make more!!!!!"

choggie kendall

See, now that may have sullied me as well but my first trip to tubbieland was about 6 hours into some psyilociben. That little cheecky sun baby makes me light right up....."UH OHHHHHH"!

Seeing a baby make fun of Colbert is the funniest thing I've ever seen...