search results matching tag: 737

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (30)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (20)     Comments (28)   

Boeing 767 - Emergency Landing With No Landing Gear

GeeSussFreeK says...

>> ^ReverendTed:

>> ^Powel6016:
These planes are 20+ years old. LOT needs new planes. Flew with LOT several times and its just ridiculous.
Just goes to show you, they don't build 'em like they used to.


The 767 has a far fewer deaths than its older cousin the 737. It isn't apples to apples, because they aren't the same class of plane, but the 737 has well over 3500+ fatalities, where as the 767 has about 500+. Its brother, the Narrow body 757, is over 700+ deaths in its run so far. The 737 is only a decade older, not enough to make up the death per year ratio of the 737. So in this case, thank god they don't make them like they used to. If you notice that in the ten latest crashes include a 737 and a 747. The 767 has had a bad rap ever since EgyptAir Flight 990, but it is a good hull if properly maintained. That being said, the plane in question was delivered to LOT on 15 May 1997, a very new plane in all respects.

C-17 landing on dirt runway

C-17 landing on dirt runway

The Decline: The Geography of the Great Recession

radx says...

31 million unemployed or working part time for economic reasons?

July 2010, not seasonally adjusted, in thousands:
U-3: 15,137
Part Time for Economic Reasons: 8,737
Marginally Attached to Labor Force: 2,622
Discouraged Workers: 1,185

That's 27,681 or 27.7 million people. So, what am I missing?

GeeSussFreeK (Member Profile)

Pilot tries to bounce down some malfunctioning landing gear

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from '737, bounce, landing gear, stuck, pilot, crash, belly landing, controlled crash' to 'boeing, 737, bounce, landing gear, stuck, pilot, crash, belly landing, controlled crash' - edited by calvados

Pilot tries to bounce down some malfunctioning landing gear

siftbot says...

Tags for this video have been changed from '737, bounce, landing gear, stuck, pilot, crash' to '737, bounce, landing gear, stuck, pilot, crash, belly landing, controlled crash' - edited by calvados

Bare essentials of safety

MaxWilder says...

Not a commercial, this is the actual flight safety video!

From YT: "Body painted Air NZ staff star in our new Bare Essentials of Safety video, created for our Domestic 737 services"

That brunette is a real cutie, too!

Will Rock Band Drums Teach You Real World Drumming?

rottenseed says...

>> ^MINK:
Yes, rock band drums will teach you real world drumming. It's really unlikely that you would get worse at drumming from playing a drum simulator.
But if you are really good at flight simulators i still don't want you flying me to London on a 737.

Have you tried Microsoft's new Hudson River landing simulator? It's awesome...

Will Rock Band Drums Teach You Real World Drumming?

MINK says...

Yes, rock band drums will teach you real world drumming. It's really unlikely that you would get worse at drumming from playing a drum simulator.

But if you are really good at flight simulators i still don't want you flying me to London on a 737.

Living LITERALLY next to airplanes - Hong Kong, 1998

Guardian-X says...

If you've ever flown into Lindbergh Field in San Diego, you'll notice that you can wave to office workers. It's also quite a sight when you're on the freeway with a 737 60 feet overhead.

Mainstream Media Silently Screams for New 9/11 Investigation

Constitutional_Patriot says...

In reply to your comment:
Well, this video focuses on the allegations of "missed warnings" and of Pentagon staff apparently lying to cover up their mistakes in dealing with the hijackings. Both of these allegations, of course, are completely incompatible with your claims of bogus plane crashes, thermite and controlled demolitions. So, it seems slightly odd to see you espousing an investigation into them. It appears that even your own fantastical beliefs are internally contradictory.

To clarify, here are some declarations of what I believe:
Par, I never claimed that planes did not hit the towers. I do believe that those planes hit the towers. I saw the 2nd plane hit on tv that morning like most people. I am just not sure if thermite was used to assist the collapse. I just don't know like many others. I do find it unusual that absolutely none of the tower's core structure survived in-tact based on the public pancake theory one would expect some of the core to be standing. Building 7 seems to be an anomaly that even none of the experts can agree upon.

I do believe that it wasn't a 757 that hit the pentagon but rather a cruise missle hit it since the titanium engines would have been visible at the pentagon site... I'm sorry.. but an entire airliner woudl not vaporize. Especially the engines and they would have left distinct marks.

Also the supposed flight 77 hijacker pilot(Hani Hanjour) was a horrible pilot and couldn't even control a cessna and a seasoned pilot would have had a hard time controlling a 757 above the ground for such a distance. I'm a pilot with about 150hrs and I can easily land a 737 in the simulator but accurate approaches in a 757 are much more difficult and highly unusual that a person with crappy piloting skills (according to the aviation school that Honjour attended) could execute the maneuvers. He couldn't even maintain a Cessna according to them. Most noteable is the corkscrew descent to the pentagon - a very difficult maneuver in a 757 and the subsequent leveling off at 20ft. above the ground, striking the first floor of the bldg, not damaging the lawn and leaving no traces of the engines. Also, the amount of confiscated videos around the pentagon just minutes after the incident and utter refusal to release such videos that should corroborate the official story.

I believe that flight 96 was shot down (based on the scattering of small debris at the crash site).

I believe that our govt definitely knew about the attacks and it was not only not-thwarted but used to their advantage by the creators of the PNAC (Project for a New American Century) that claimed they needed "a new Pearl Harbor" in the PNAC document. Therefore it was in their best interest to have the catalyzing event that would allow them to enact the Patriot Act (which was already written and ready to go in case of such an event) and allowed Bush to call for war with almost unanimous public, senate and house consent.

S W A M P the D I A M O N D (Sift Talk Post)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon