search results matching tag: 60 minutes
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.005 seconds
Videos (191) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (20) | Comments (298) |
Videos (191) | Sift Talk (3) | Blogs (20) | Comments (298) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Boise_Lib (Member Profile)
Thanks!!!!!!
In reply to this comment by Boise_Lib:
*promote
Who Stole Superman? -- A "60 Minutes" on Video Piracy (1979)
>> ^ctrlaltbleach:
dead
Fixed and thanks.
luxury_pie (Member Profile)
fixed, sweetpea.
In reply to this comment by luxury_pie:
*dead
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
Thought some of you might be interested in this video from a lecture at Johns Hopkins Medicine. It's not as glossy as 60 Minutes and it can be a little dry at times, but it gives an alternate view on Kirsch's placebo research.
http://videosift.com/video/Antidepressants-and-Placebo-Controversies-Johns-Hopkins
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
I'm not sure if you're serious or not, but there was a study at MIT that showed more expensive placebos were more effective than less expensive placebos. That is, there was a reliable effect of the cost of the sugar pill. I know... depressing right? That's just what we need to tell the drug companies. "You don't even need to do research... just mark up the sugar until it starts working."
>> ^dag:
Yes, but you need to pay until it hurts for the placebo effect to work.>> ^eric3579:
I hope at some point I'm taking sugar pills that work. I'm guessing they are a hell of a lot cheaper.
berticus (Member Profile)
Your video, 60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
>> ^DuoJet:
This is total, f cking, bullsh t. I tried a number of different medications before I found the right one for me. Some of the medications I tried did nothing, some caused unwanted side effects, only one got me where I wanted to be.
For me the difference has not been modest, but life-changing.
Friends have described the similar experiences.
Do not stop taking your anti-depressants based on this report.
My experience is similar to yours but let us not dismiss these findings just because they are not what we want to hear.
Assuming these findings are correct for a moment, it could be that you and I are the sort of people who genuinely benefit from the drugs whereas the vast majority of people who are given the drugs are not and are merely benefiting from placebo.
berticus (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)
Yes, but you need to pay until it hurts for the placebo effect to work.>> ^eric3579:
I hope at some point I'm taking sugar pills that work. I'm guessing they are a hell of a lot cheaper.
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
>> ^DuoJet:
I am one of those people, and I experience genuine physiological effects from these drugs...
The physiological effects of a placebo are no less "genuine" than that of drugs.
Also, your own perceptual experience of your medication's effects lends no scientific credibility to your position that the chemicals are responsible.
I'm glad you found something that works though, I doubt I ever will.
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
I'll just add some nuance to your assertion below. The issue is not so much that depression is "misdiagnosed." The issue is that depression doesn't have a known physiological cause. That is, there is no anatomical or physiological marker for depression. It's a behaviorally defined disorder. That means it is entirely possible (even likely) that multiple patients all suffering from "depression" (i.e. exhibiting the behavioral symptoms of depression, thus being properly diagnosed) could be suffering as a result of differing physiological problems.
Almost all psychiatric disorders (other than maybe Parkinson's and some other known neurological malfunctions) have this issue. The problem I have with this is our readiness to prescribe physiological interventions for conditions that can't be diagnosed physiologically. While many of these substances are relatively benign, some have the potential to cause extremely problematic side effects (e.g. acute suicidal urges). The real work is going to be in finding better mechanistic level diagnostics.
In the mean time, I think more conservative treatment protocols are warranted. If sugar pills show some efficacy, why not start with those? You could still ramp up to an SSRI or the like when the sugar pill is shown to be ineffective in that patient. Better still are behavioral therapies, e.g. exercise or sleeping schedule changes. At the very least, I think they should be prescribed along with and emphasized just as much as the pills and counseling.
Longterm, I think pharmacological interventions into the brain are somewhat misguided. Serotonin receptors, for instance, are expressed all over your brain. I think more promising are the newer treatments like deep brain stimulation. It has been shown to be extremely effective in disorders like Parkinson's, and trials are already underway in the treatment of depression. Not only do I think the treatment will ultimately be more effective, I also think research into that sort of treatment is more likely to bear fruit in understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of these disorders. Hopefully that will lead to better sub classifications of people exhibiting depressive behavior.
>> ^DuoJet:
I'm inclined to believe that, as is often suggested, depression is very commonly misdiagnosed. This would surely introduce "extraneous variables" into placebo studies as well.
60 minutes - the powerful placebo effect
This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by Norsuelefantti. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.
60 minutes - the powerful placebo effect
*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/60-minutes-depression-and-the-placebo-effect
dag (Member Profile)
Thank you, kind sir.
In reply to this comment by dag:
*promote
60 minutes - depression and the placebo effect
That's great that you found a medication that works. Really, I mean that. I'm a big fan of "whatever works" when it comes to mental health -- although there are some extremely unethical goings on with pharmaceutical companies and the FDA, readily spelled out in this brief piece. I especially like that the FDA man has a fundamental misunderstanding of basic statistics -- and then said it was basic statistics. Facepalm!
Data are data, and anecdotes are anecdotes. And with anecdotes, there is a distinct lack of control over extraneous variables.
Also, at the end of the report, and in the companion piece, they state explicitly that you should not stop taking your anti-depressants.
I encourage you to look further into this story and the science behind it, rather than dismissing it simply because it doesn't match your experience.
>> ^DuoJet:
This is total, f cking, bullsh t. I tried a number of different medications before I found the right one for me. Some of the medications I tried did nothing, some caused unwanted side effects, only one got me where I wanted to be.
For me the difference has not been modest, but life-changing.
Friends have described the similar experiences.
Do not stop taking your anti-depressants based on this report.