In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
I have Above & Beyond podcast. I like it better than AVB's

Here is a link to the A&B home page.
http://www.aboveandbeyond.nu/index.php
TY, love it!

But, I love you baby! I was trying to prove a point, granted I just got back home from the bar, was completly smashed, and was in no condition to give an opinion about anything. I have since learned to stay away from comment pages during times of innebriation. You know it's bad when you wake up feeling regret about something as benign as internet comments.
In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
In reply to this comment by highdileeho:
Whatever you cracker ass faggot



In reply to this comment by Heartspark:
This is why people don't say crap when riding public transportation. You don't know the person, or anything about them. Hell they could be on the bus with a handgun ready to take out every coworker they are with and was going to leave you alone till you said "hello".


Racist, mental problems, or not..EBM WAS in the right here. He did defend himself.
Black or white does not matter, you do not act on impulses to do whatever violent act you see fit based on someones words towards you.

If that was the case, half you mother fuckers would be dead on here.


Wow, I had respect for you. Now I don't.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

In California, a "mutual affray" is usually a defense against child abuse when a fight is between minors. A mutual affray requires intent by both parties to get into a tussle: something akin to "I'll meet you in the parking lot at the Dollar Store so we can throw down." There is no such thing as verbal battery and an assault requires the perceived threat of immediate bodily harm, neither of which EBM can be accused of in my opinion. This is clearly a case of an assault and battery by the young man and retaliation in form of self defense by EBM.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
Question for you, which may or may not be founded, I judged by your screen name that you know something about law.

Epic Beard Man and his assailant are both possibly guilty of Mutual Affray?


http://definitions.uslegal.com/m/mutual-affray/

Thanks for that great definition, I would be lost in this world if people like you don't take up the role of degrading peoples intellect. That speling corection: thank you. I assume you sent out replies to everyone who had an opinion on this video? oh right, you were being a loudmouthed arrogant duchebag.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
>> ^highdileeho:
I'm pretty sure that mother fucker asked the black guy to spit shine his 'stacy adams'. that's why the whole thing started, and why the woman replied with racial slurs, It was in response to the motherfuckers racism. I'm pretty sure the black guy was just reacting to the white guys racism as well. The motherfucker started it, the motherfucker initiated the bullying, and the black guy was vilified for being in the wrong. Funny how everyone assumed that the black guy must have deserved it. You refer to an asian as a 'chinaman' on the street and see if you get the motherfucker treatment, I bet you will. I just hope the asian won't vilified.
I changed the spelling of the word Vilified to be correct in your quote, so now it is a paraphrase.

We don't know what happened before the video, so there is no way to know for sure who started what. Or how the conversation began to take place. The evidence in the video is circumstantial. This means we have to infer what happened before, and that is highly uncertain. Circumstantial evidence alone is not enough to have a case, there must be corroborating evidence. There simply exists, for us, no way to know what took place before the beginning of this video.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Not all libertarians are completely secular *nudge nudge*. Rational Party For Liberty sounds good though! Though, I guess you could throw in secular as a condition of the rule of state, not to the people in it...perhaps Religiously free (as in free from the state control of religion) Rational Party for Liberty...but I think you can just eliminate that all by using rational in the word, it precludes both faith and personal morality.... so ya, Rational Party For Liberty gets my vote!

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
To think that something which started from the End the Fed rallies has morphed into something so stupid.

I'm ashamed to call myself a Libertarian if there are millions of these people who watched Fox news and decided that they were Libertarians.

How many of them now about John Stuart Mill, John Locke, or that most of the old white people wanted freedom for themselves from the British Empire, not for their slaves.

These people have been drinking too much of the Faux news water, I think they are very mad.

I true Libertarian would know that having a corporation behind your movement means you are no longer a Libertarian, you are a Plutocrat.

Lets start by making a new party, the Secular Humanist Rational Party For Liberty (Liberty for all, not just who you choose), where you have to think about things before you spout stupid shit.

Thanks for the reply, i know it's hard to fully remember every nuance of what you were trying to express a year after the event. I read some of my old comments and wonder what in the blue hell i was thinking.

Funny though, every exam i've ever been in has had 10 clocks or upwards. I've only ever been in large halls for exams though. That leads me to believe it's just based on whether or not people can see it. If everyone can see it, you'd only need one, and if you've got a big hall you'd need a few so everyone could get a glimpse. Well, another thing to be honest adds to this; my dad was a head of department at a secondary school and i've seen him setting up for exams and also his nature towards students that will be taking his exams. It was always based towards making them more comfortable or facilitating their abilities during the exam.

It's weird how two people can have such different suspicions towards 'the establishment' based on a few experiences, isn't it? Perhaps if my dad had been in charge of personnel and recruiting at a large corporation and had to be ruthless and use such headgames to single different types of people out, i'd have an entirely different nature towards 'the establishment'.

For lack of a better term.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
I think at the time I must have been talking about authority, or having to go to one place for the time, and that time could be wrong. How would you know? You wouldn't unless you had a clock of your own to compare it to. Even so, what are the consequences of leaving before the proper time? So yes, I think I was speaking on the monopoly of time that the testers have.

It adds to a situation, a way of setting you up. Making you uncomfortable, or comfortable. Provided you are comfortable in a room with only one clock. Most of the rooms I've been in, like the ones I described, had only one clock.

But now that I look at the comment, it may have been a bit of comedy on my part. Playing on the testing rooms were every one is quiet, and only the ticking of the clock is heard. With each tick, each scratch of the pencil on the test the tock gets louder.

In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
It was a long time ago, but what did you mean about the clocks?

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
charles mansion proves that with proper conditioning a group of people can be made to do damning things.

Milgrams Experiment any one? People can and will be manipulated every day, will you be one of them? We should all strive to free our minds.

Ever wonder why the testing rooms for standardized tests have only one clock in them? Or no clock at all? Or One very loud clock?

It was a long time ago, but what did you mean about the clocks?

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
charles mansion proves that with proper conditioning a group of people can be made to do damning things.

Milgrams Experiment any one? People can and will be manipulated every day, will you be one of them? We should all strive to free our minds.

Ever wonder why the testing rooms for standardized tests have only one clock in them? Or no clock at all? Or One very loud clock?

You got it, horse.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
I'll leave this here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunneling_protocol

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quisling



Remind me to promote this, tomorrow.

Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.

Your video, Neutron Stars: Magnetars Pulsars- History Channel, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

I think this was posted after this video raised the question about a dropped bullet and a bullet fired from a gun. The question being, which bullet will hit the ground first?

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
What is the question? There wasn't enough context for me to understand what the hell was going on. Except a gun, in a really cool device that I want for my self.

http://mythbustersresults.com/episode-124-curving-bullets

Also, one of the proposed ways, from the link above, to bend or curve a bullet is to make a very large magnetic field and have, of course, bullets that contain enough magnetic materials in them to be affected by said field.

Never mind. Think we're on the same side.

The FED. It's real and it's not governmental.

And it can't be audited or the world will end.

Quick hello. I misunderstood one of your posts until I read it to the end.

Lesson learned.

In reply to this comment by NordlichReiter:
Now we have private police officers!

What does that remind you of?