Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
westysays...SANTA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oh no its Daniel denit my mistake.
Its a scientific fact ( proven with no evidence) that the bigger your beard the greater a philosopher you are.
westysays...fucks sake the Christian , fundmentaly where are you geting your belife in god from ? oh the bible or some writen down txt ? WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ACPETING THAT AS EVIDENCE ARE YOU AN IDIOT ?
fucking picker and choosers in many ways more idoitc than fundamentalists.
siftbotsays...Moving this video to village1diot's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
gwiz665says...Ignorance should always be forgiven and corrected. Willful ignorance and deception is inexcusable though.
*quality
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by gwiz665.
CircleMakersays...The response by that theologian was more word salad than all the Hidden Valley Ranches of the world can dress... only to meekly concede Dennett's point at the last breath.
xxovercastxxsays...While I disagree with a large portion of it, Haught's response is interesting. I'm surprised some of you are having such a hard time comprehending it.
johnald128says...everytime they spread intelligent design lies they should have The Greatest Show On Earth thrown at them, or have it read to them very slowly, using smaller simpler words that they can understand.
curiousitysays...>> ^xxovercastxx:
While I disagree with a large portion of it, Haught's response is interesting. I'm surprised some of you are having such a hard time comprehending it.
There is a rather passionate and immediate rejection of it, isn't there? Although there is a great deal of "careful talking", Haught clearly did not move to defend creationism science and tries to separate himself from the passionate followers of ID or creation science.
Does he believe in them? Well this is a short clip and I haven't watched the rest so I can't say. But I'd wager that neither did the other commentators. In reality he probably has some hazy position, but it is interesting to watch people jump to their immediate mud-slinging position without effort or seemingly without listening comprehension. No one from National Geographic is chasing you... you don't have to jump off the cliff.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.