Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
11 Comments
wolfiesays...maybe im just more observant, but i could still see them changing, just not as rapidly.
GeeSussFreeKsays...>> ^wolfie:
maybe im just more observant, but i could still see them changing, just not as rapidly.
And that is the trick because they are changing just as rapidly...which freaks me out. Try just looking at one and you will notice the rate doesn't change.
darkrowansays...Same for me
>> ^wolfie:
maybe im just more observant, but i could still see them changing, just not as rapidly.
wolfiesays...>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^wolfie:
maybe im just more observant, but i could still see them changing, just not as rapidly.
And that is the trick because they are changing just as rapidly...which freaks me out. Try just looking at one and you will notice the rate doesn't change.
always remember, optical illusions don't work the same for everyone some people's brains process what they see differently.
GeeSussFreeKsays...>> ^wolfie:
>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^wolfie:
maybe im just more observant, but i could still see them changing, just not as rapidly.
And that is the trick because they are changing just as rapidly...which freaks me out. Try just looking at one and you will notice the rate doesn't change.
always remember, optical illusions don't work the same for everyone some people's brains process what they see differently.
Right, I get that. But you were basically saying what the illusion was like you didn't see an illusion at all. The whole point was that you see them shifting color, but slower...even though the change hasn't slowed
siftbotsays...This post has been removed from the Brain channel by channel owner jonny. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.
gwiz665says...@jonny Doesn't this belong in the brain channel? Sensory perception is a part of the brain after all?
*science *anatomy
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Anatomy, Science) - requested by gwiz665.
siftbotsays...2 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
jonnysays...>> ^gwiz665:
@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/jonny" title="member since July 10th, 2007" class="profilelink">jonny Doesn't this belong in the brain channel? Sensory perception is a part of the brain after all?
science anatomy
No - I intended the brain channel to be a collection of videos that describe how minds and brains work. It's not intended for videos that show brains working. Honestly - I've just about given up trying to enforce this, because it seems no one can be bothered to read the channel description.
I don't see how it belongs in Anatomy either, but I'll let peggedbea be the judge of that.
jonnysays...^ wtf happened there?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.