Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
4 Comments
westysays...could just shoot with a smaller digital camera and then Photoshop it to look the same , but then I guess it would not be as "artistic" that way.
not that I have anything against shooting with film , but its pretty inconveneant and if your end product can be achieved without using film might as well not use it if your going to inconvenance yourself why not go to the exstreem ? why stop at a film camara why not use a pinhole camera , why not stop and paint every person ?
I can see a justification for using film is that you like the random artefacts and inherent qualities , but again you can achieve those qualities using Photoshop only with the advantage of full artistic control.
geo321says...Pastafarian at 1:56
siftbotsays...Moving this video to Raaagh's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
oritteroposays...At 10 exposures per roll, for 120 roll film, it would cost about $A3-4/shot in Australia (just buying the roll film is about $A15). I'd expect it to be a bit cheaper in HK or China, but still not really cheap.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.