Nice threesome.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2009/05/07/threesome-marriages.html

It always smells like a threesome on Videosift.

Passed out and humped by a dog...let's see, how could this get any worse?

Furry drops by for a threesome?
Tibetan monk REALLY wants that spot for a self-immolation protest?
High school bus stop?

This interpertation stems from jewish mysticism, but it doesn't at all follow from the passage:

When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it. 7 Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves

Sex is pleasing to the eye and good for food? She took sex and then gave it to her husband? It's a nonsense interpertation. This was about knowledge. Adam and Eve were in a state of innocence, kind of like babes, and relied on God for everything. Eve decided that she didn't want to be babied anymore and make her own decisions. She lusted after Gods wisdom; she wanted to make judgements for herself. God warned them against going it alone, and that it would lead to death..this is because the Lords ways are perfect, and perfection leads to eternal life. Imperfection leads to death. When Adam and Eve decided to try to take the place of God in their life, they became mortal, and corrupted. That's how sin and death entered the world, and is still the problem today..that people want to trust in their own wisdom above that of their Creator.



>> ^Lawdeedaw:
>> ^bareboards2:
@packo, what is sad is that folks will watch this and not understand the illogical sand upon which the whole video sits. It is effective -- look at the votes it is garnering.
What bothers me so much is the whole idea of punishing Adam and Eve for gaining knowledge. For punishing them for "disobeying" God. It is the spine that runs through so much of the Christian religion -- shut up and do what the person in charge says.
Having said that, I recognize that many people crave the discipline and structure of an outside agency to help shape their lives.
Nothing is perfect. Religion does much good and helps folks. Religion is also responsible for some of the worst crimes against humanity. Both can be true, the statements are not mutually exclusive.
And therein lies true Freedom -- the choice to walk away from an authoritarian presence and create your own inner moral compass through free will, not because you are threatened with burning in hell for eternity.

Most say that Adam/Eve was about a threesome and that the fruit was a metaphor... Adam sleeping with a man (Devil) and sharing his wife with that man...

>> ^bareboards2:

@packo, what is sad is that folks will watch this and not understand the illogical sand upon which the whole video sits. It is effective -- look at the votes it is garnering.
What bothers me so much is the whole idea of punishing Adam and Eve for gaining knowledge. For punishing them for "disobeying" God. It is the spine that runs through so much of the Christian religion -- shut up and do what the person in charge says.
Having said that, I recognize that many people crave the discipline and structure of an outside agency to help shape their lives.
Nothing is perfect. Religion does much good and helps folks. Religion is also responsible for some of the worst crimes against humanity. Both can be true, the statements are not mutually exclusive.
And therein lies true Freedom -- the choice to walk away from an authoritarian presence and create your own inner moral compass through free will, not because you are threatened with burning in hell for eternity.


Most say that Adam/Eve was about a threesome and that the fruit was a metaphor... Adam sleeping with a man (Devil) and sharing his wife with that man...

I love that, taking over 2000 people to India, renting 800 rooms. OK, so that's a lot of room sharing going on. Plenty of threesomes for everybody, wahey! Just goes to prove her polygamy comment that's all...

He missed the argument in a few ways. The same people who say gay marriage is unnatural also say that humans were created specially by God, so those same people can claim that humans were created to have straight and non-incestuous sex only.

A better argument for gay marriage (remember now that gay marriage isn't equal to butt sex) is that there are long-term gay couples in nature, including a famous threesome (of geese? ducks?) in the Central Park Zoo. They are a better example for gay marriage in nature.

But those same people can also claim that God made humans to be higher than any animal, and part of "higher" means that animals can do what they do, but it's only natural for humans to marry people of the opposite sex.

The argument against this is that marriage itself is a human-made social convention. In the beginning, there wasn't any marriage. It simply became socially easier if a particular woman was officially claimed and recognized as claimed by the rest of the society to prevent costly infighting between the men who were then unavailable to hunt and defend the tribe.

But those same people can also claim that God created the institution of marriage at the moment he created Eve, so there never was a lack of marriage in society.

And there is no argument against dogma. So don't bother.

What would have made this funnier is if it was a threesome. Three trucks, what would the odds be?

>> ^kymbos:

Mentioning Russell Brand in polite company, let alone in comparison with the supremely talented Minchin, is a crime. Brand does jokes about sperm and threesomes (see, he's a sex god - get the subtext?) - Minchin invites thought.


Although Brand does indeed do jokes about sperm and threesomes http://videosift.com/video/Russell-Brand-s-Threesome-With-His-Mate-Matt and I know you have no time for him, I think his comedy is more kind of using the English language to it's full effect. He might not be funny to everyone but he is incredibly intelligent, Stephen Fry credits him, who can argue?! BTW, I'm not his biggest advocate either and I agree Tim is more talented

Mentioning Russell Brand in polite company, let alone in comparison with the supremely talented Minchin, is a crime. Brand does jokes about sperm and threesomes (see, he's a sex god - get the subtext?) - Minchin invites thought.

This could go 1 of 2 ways.

"...well, there's one thing you could do..."

1: "...you could accept the lord Jesus Christ and vow to him, with me, our love for him"

2: "...you could invite your fend Linda over for a threesome"

I have a solution.. just go for a threesome ok?

'Why would you not get with someone else?' Well, people fake orgasms for many reasons... and sex isn't everything. I'm a man and I've faked it(lol) because it was simply not going to happen, I was exhausted and the other person wasn't that great in getting the job done.

You're gay(or bisexual) if you are attracted to your same sex. Simple. Having a sexual encounter with someone of the same sex DOES NOT make you gay. I don't know what's so complicated about that. For instance if I had a threesome and there was a man involved, I'm primarily going to be enjoying the woman. How does that make me gay or bi because there was contact with a man? Or if I went into a completely dark room and never saw the person who got me off... it could have been someone of either sex... so the act is asexual however it is the thought or preference that defines your sexuality.

If she gets it on with a Dutch door, is that a threesome?