selflink? *discuss

It's "couldn't care less." If you could care less, then you still have a small amount of caring in yourself. And that's just careless.

>> ^joedirt:
Look, I really could care less. Take it up with the boss men since you can't seem to let go. Heck put up a siftquisition thread. If that's the only way you stop harping on this, go ahead. I'm just telling you that even as unpopular as I am, you're gonna lose, and that is saying something. I actually had your best interest in mind and was trying to reduce drama, but you keep wanting to pick at it.
>> ^blankfist:
Yes, you can discard a post when it is in direct violation of the site rules. Yes, when people are selflinking or spamming. Sure. But, I wasn't doing that, joedirt. You may disagree with my post or that I discarded my own, but I wasn't breaking site rules. You did.

Look, I really could care less. Take it up with the boss men since you can't seem to let go. Heck put up a siftquisition thread. If that's the only way you stop harping on this, go ahead. I'm just telling you that even as unpopular as I am, you're gonna lose, and that is saying something. I actually had your best interest in mind and was trying to reduce drama, but you keep wanting to pick at it.

>> ^blankfist:
Yes, you can discard a post when it is in direct violation of the site rules. Yes, when people are selflinking or spamming. Sure. But, I wasn't doing that, joedirt. You may disagree with my post or that I discarded my own, but I wasn't breaking site rules. You did.

Yes, you can discard a post when it is in direct violation of the site rules. Yes, when people are selflinking or spamming. Sure. But, I wasn't doing that, joedirt. You may disagree with my post or that I discarded my own, but I wasn't breaking site rules. You did.

*ban cut and dried. potentialy interesting vid, didnt have time at work to fully watch it. anyone want to sift it if it is?

bncman, if you read the guidlines, selflinking is not allowed. you did read those didnt you. you had to to submit this

*ban, looks like a selflink (youtube username is OnYourMarkEU)

heh. this reminded me of bruce willis' coffee franchise idea. I can't sift it coz selflink.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqrRj3-S--g

*discuss

The youtube account is for wrytoast3 -I smell a selflink

*ban

shame because I really enjoyed this and was about to throw it a promote

Joedirt, you're drunk. For the record, I did some research on his name and that particular video. When I say "research", let's not get carried away thinking I spent a CSI all-nighter. A couple google searches were ample, and I was able to find a user page for whynot11 which had videos this user marked as his. None of which were this video. Then I found those videos on youtube, all of them belonging to the same account. None of them this video. I think it's reasonable to say this video probably isn't a selflink.

Now leave my sockpuppet alone! I would've gotten away with it if it wasn't for you meddling kids!

Sadly looks like a self - link I would like to hear Desue comment on this -

Rules clearly state - no selflinking - videos that were made,uploaded,feature you and your work

Videosift is not a promotional site - but you can ask other members to post something of yours here, but you cannot do it yourself.

*showdown

that's my idea/suggestion.
i came up with it shortly after choggie's recent unplanned vacation, actually. i was going to toss it up as a sift talk when he came back, as a welcoming gift, but i chickened out because i have some weird aversion to sifttalk, which is why in a year and a half i've only posted three. yet clearly, i have no such aversion to run-on sentences. but, i digress.

choggie said something, right at the end, about discarding things because he felt the irresistible draw of the shiny red button.

i just never perceived it that way, so his saying that made it much clearer what the problem was. because dag made it pretty clear, i had thought, that discard wasn't for intended for subjective reasons. just dupes, deaths, porn, selflinks, etc, where there wasn't any wiggle room. wiggle room meant discuss first.

so, i thought, choggie wants a shiny red button, let's give it to him.
five bucks gets you one silver bullet.

it may or may not involve the ability to change one's prior vote. if not, we can still rely on those who haven't voted yet, and we're asking them to watch and give an up or down, don't just pass.

anyone who ponies up for the special one-time invoke, forces a *showdown and sends the sift to the top, even above promotes, until the agreed-upon clock time/vote count differential is met, and the sift either stays or gets sent to discardia.

so, just everyone give this comment an up or down, no hard feelings either way, as to whether or not you want a *showdown

[edit] kp - thank you for your honesty! srsly. i was expecting more downvotes.

>> ^Eklek:
Sounds nice,
Isn´t this a selflink?


Quoted for emphasis. Inquiring minds want to know.

Sounds nice,
Isn´t this a selflink?

Banned for selflinking: http://www.videosift.com/video/Amber-Models-Sexy-Celebrity-Event-Hot-UK-Babes

selflink

*ban