Ok, this is very cute, but if I were one of the parents, I would use this opportunity for science. Does the little girl innately know which one is her father?

hmmm... it's probably a good thing I don't have kids. Apparently experimenting on your children is frowned upon. Experimenting on other peoples kids is all good though

And if they were less cute and provided decent nutrition, we'd eat them, so what?

Fighting starvation is not a great indicator of anything, you might eat another human or yourself if you were in a situation that warranted it. I don't think I need to defend against the circle of life, we're the very last species that can frown on another animal for eating something smaller than it.

Enjoying and giving affection is not an exclusive condition, you don't have to *always* and *only* love your one owner constantly. That'd just be annoying.

I believe in research, it suggests cats are quite affectionate to their owners, it is simply not displayed in ways that humans typically understand. Experiments done by people who actually want to understand cat behaviour and not just contrast it to that of a dog, find that cat expression is rather complicated and subtle. It requires long and repeated observation, cats are not suited to these 10minute experiments.

It's an ongoing study, some if it is really quite new, you can look it up or you can continue not caring, I'm not particularly fussed. Thankfully I don't need validation to enjoy the relationship I have with my cat, I don't think it wants only me and I don't have a problem with that, I do think she feels we're rather good friends. That's something I'm happy with.

All these unused muscles in my normally frowning face are all achy now.

Ok-Watched it and I recant, it's re-watchable.Rather enjoyed the realistic gun play. Oh, and not having to see that cheesy Cruise smile. He frowns through the entire film.

Made me wanna watch Way of the Gun again, another film with very believable gun play.

This guy reminds me of someone I knew back in what I assume must be Sweden's equivalent to High School.

I'd always thought he seemed like a nice, intelligent and well-adjusted guy, and... then I sat down and spoke to him.

To put it mildly, he shattered my expectations of him.

See, apparently, this guy had figured out (through various prophetic texts as well as the Bible) that there was a huge comet hurtling towards Earth, and that it would surely eradicate all life on the planet if we failed to stop it. Luckily, my (absolutely fucking bat-shit crazy) buddy had it all figured out.

He had three plans; either we simply send up four rockets with a great big rubber net suspended between them, or we pile everybody into Russia and cause the Earth to roll out of orbit, or we take a bunch of atoms, squish them all together, and create a kick-ass and completely impenetrable force field. Obviously, I asked him how the atoms were going to be kept together - after all, atoms are notoriously unwilling to cuddle - and for a moment, this gave him pause. He simply sat there with a frown, looking down at the table between us. Then, his face suddenly lit up with self-congratulatory smugness and, with one arched eyebrow and supreme confidence, he proudly uttered two words:

"Computer chips!"

We didn't really talk much after that.

That tool McConnell has that look of the classic intelligence insect:

Big, scary skull
Forced smile (his resting face being a permanent frown)
Scripted, emotionless newsspeak
Ex-Military written all over his manner and tone

It's a goddamn cockroach infestation in the dry-goods pantry is what it is and weevils in the fucking flour tin!!

Yes, it rather seems to me this is probably precisely the reason all other planes don't have the fuel dump nozzle right by the engines.

I suppose, on the other hand, that at least in this situation, the alternative is spraying the crowd with kerosene, which is probably frowned upon.

As I see it, Bitcoin has use in:

-fast, low-cost electronic (not face-to-face) transactions
-transactions frowned upon or outlawed by governments or other sufficiently powerful entities.

It isn't like government currency, although it can be used for many of the same things.

Ah snake... you forgot to mention @dag that he also when through and effectively discarded every one of his posts via edit. There was much discussion afterwords about the effect on the future of the community when no one could see its past.

Also, to this day I can't look at a techcrunch article without a frown because of the whole sift/pligg incident.

...a shotgun? Also might I add that this is just pure advertising.....yeah we kinda frown upon using VS for your own corporate advancement

Thank you for the attempt

You can cast *quality, but need to post more vids or quality sift talks and get gold to *promote (although that could change in 5).
In reply to this comment by TheSluiceGate:
Well oritteropo, I tried :

In reply to this comment by oritteropo:
Oh no! I only just got around to watching, and you've already stabbed it to death with a *kill :
>> ^pumkinandstorm:

*kill


Awwww...sorry to disappoint you. It didn't seem like anyone liked it so I put it to sleep. Feel free to post it yourself if you'd like.

In reply to this comment by ant:
:

I will throw mandures at your pretty face.

In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
But I don't want to be squished by your ugly/smelly/dirty foot, honey.

In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
It better be clean!

In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
OK, now I think I will have to terminate you.

In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
Thank you. As for identity, I was pointing out the typo. ;

In reply to this comment by pumkinandstorm:
In reply to this comment by ant:
Nice mugshot! You look very nice. :

Thank you very much and you don't look so bad yourself antinator ;

As for my identity...I thought we had established I was a fairy! :


Yu dun lik spellng mstks du u? Duz thes driv u krazee?


I'd like to see you try tough guy. Just keep in mind that I carry a can of raid in my purse.


Mmm, Raid. I love sniffing that.

....and there's always my foot.


That would be the least of your worries dear ant.


I'll step in a BIG steamy pile of manure before the big s-q-u-i-s-h...smells even better than Raid.


*licks lips* Bring it on antinator, bring it on...

It might be blocked in your region, but it is not dead.

Thanks.
In reply to this comment by raverman:
*dead video not found? :

We be humans, baby. Not equations. We are a messy set of conflicting urges and needs, lizard brain versus frontal cortex (or whatever, I don't know my brain anatomy and don't care to do the research to get this statement exactly correct.)

Men and women both.


>> ^Murgy:

>> ^bareboards2:
Good lord, as women we can't get away from what guys want. It should ONLY be what the women want to do.
I live in a town where "dressing up" everyday is frowned upon.

Here in-lies the flaw in attempting to promote the concept of personal choice by actively supporting the opposite of the current status quo in a given situation, whatever that may be.
If achieving an alternative to a given issue is ones primary goal, clearly stating so is conducive to clear communication, debate, and the exchange of ideas.
If promoting the concept of personal choice in a given issue is ones primary goal, clearly stating so is conducive to clear communication, debate, and the exchange of ideas.
If maintaining the current status quo in a given issue is ones primary goal, clearly stating so is conducive to clear communication, debate, and the exchange of ideas.
One can not have multiple primary goals, and to combine them creates an argument that is not only contradictory, but is less than the sum of it's parts.