search results matching tag: ejaculating

» channel: weather

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (24)     Sift Talk (1)     Blogs (3)     Comments (151)   

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

Opus_Moderandi says...

>> ^Trancecoach:

The longer you go without cumming, the longer you can go without cumming. That is, the more days (weeks, months, etc.) you have between ejaculations (nocturnal emissions included!), the more stamina you'll have in bed, to the point where, you just won't cum unless you want to.


It's kind of the opposite for me... hair trigger and all that...

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

spoco2 says...

@MilkmanDan yeah... that is seriously backwards to the way most guys work. If you want to last longer, just ejaculate before sex. Then you'll have more stamina during sex.

If you haven't cum for a long time before sex then the normal experience is that you'll have a quick trigger and come very quickly.

Does that mean for you the more you cum the quicker you can then cum again? That sounds freaky!

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

MilkmanDan says...

>> ^Trancecoach:

The longer you go without cumming, the longer you can go without cumming. That is, the more days (weeks, months, etc.) you have between ejaculations (nocturnal emissions included!), the more stamina you'll have in bed, to the point where, you just won't cum unless you want to.

...<insert not_sure_if_serious.jpg>


That goes against my own experience enough that on first reading I figured you either forgot the sarcasm checkbox, or there would be a ScoobyDoo ending where somebody would rip a facemask off of you and reveal one of those hardcore Catholic "ejaculation for procreation ONLY!" people.

But putting all that aside, if that method works for you then more power to ya!

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

Trancecoach says...

The longer you go without cumming, the longer you can go without cumming. That is, the more days (weeks, months, etc.) you have between ejaculations (nocturnal emissions included!), the more stamina you'll have in bed, to the point where, you just won't cum unless you want to.

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

alien_concept says...

>> ^messenger:

Except Dan instead answered, "How can I make the sex event last longer?", which is a different question entirely. The audience member wanted the answer to, "How can I keep pumping my partner without orgasming so quick?" (delay ejaculation during intercourse). Any idiot knows that if you stop the intercourse and do other stuff that you won't cum. This was no help at all.


Well maybe what he's pointing out is that there is no need to last for ages through penetration alone if you concentrate on doing other stuff in between. Anyway, unless a woman is lucky enough to be able to orgasm through penetration, it gets pretty old pretty quick. Maybe that's just me though

Dan Savage Advises How to Last Longer in the Sack

messenger says...

Except Dan instead answered, "How can I make the sex event last longer?", which is a different question entirely. The audience member wanted the answer to, "How can I keep pumping my partner without orgasming so quick?" (delay ejaculation during intercourse). Any idiot knows that if you stop the intercourse and do other stuff that you won't cum. This was no help at all.

Dan Savage - Are There Good Christians?

acidSpine says...

God damn there's some huge ejaculations, semens almost cumming out of you lot. Who would have thought a queer blowing off some christians could have caused such an orgy of banging at the keyboard. It's a metaphorical desert of paragraph sized dunes for anyone following this thread so I'll let Epicurus keep it brief.

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?”

Epicurus – Greek philosopher, BC 341-270

LOL It's like the argument for an all loving, omnipotent god was destroyed before Jesus was even born.

Note: This isn't why I'm not religious. I don't believe because I wasn't indoctrinated as a small child. That and the booze and drugs are still working for me da dum Ching1

Now before you, dear reader, set of oncemore into the desert of hopelessly convoluted diatribes, fill your camelskin bladders at the endlessly refreshing oasis of Bill Hicks, I believe named that after the comedian though I can't be sure of the chronology.

"The whole image is that eternal suffering awaits anyone who questions God's infinite love. That's the message we're brought up with, isn't it? Believe or die! Thank you, forgiving Lord, for all those options."

Bill Hicks - 16 December 1961 – 26 February 1994

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere Warned the British

Xaielao says...

>> ^Gallowflak:

She talks like a drunk pretending to be sober. Wandering aimlessly through incoherent ideas, just barely managing to ejaculate a sentence that sort of connects where it starts to where it ends. Really, just... GTFO. Please.


You put the nail on the head right there. I always thought nobody could ramble through a sentence as bad as Bush. Oh how so wrong I was.

And QM I'm starting to think your not a real person at all. Just some algorithm thought up by conservatives to go around the internet and spew some random shit that sounds half intelligible when ever you happen upon a discussion or video where a popular republican is the topic of discussion.

Sarah Palin: Paul Revere Warned the British

Gallowflak says...

She talks like a drunk pretending to be sober. Wandering aimlessly through incoherent ideas, just barely managing to ejaculate a sentence that sort of connects where it starts to where it ends. Really, just... GTFO. Please.

Sexual Deception by Orchid lures Wasp to mate with it

WTF Jim Beam

How To Control Ejaculation

Trancecoach says...

>> ^KnivesOut:

comedy wtf
Seriously, what the fuck.


It's not as crazy as you think. This practice, in tandem with other practices, such as a microcosmic orbit, retains male life-force energy, increases your and your partners' sexual pleasure, and allows you last as long as you want.

Freek Like Me - She Likes to Suck

Trancecoach says...

An Oral fixation is a fixation in the oral stage of development manifested by an obsession with stimulating the mouth (oral) first described by Sigmund Freud, who thought infants are naturally and adaptively in an oral stage, but if weaned too early or too late, may fail to resolve the conflicts of this stage and develop a maladaptive oral fixation. In later life, these people may constantly "hunger" for activities involving the mouth.

A child who is not fed enough (neglected) or is fed too much (over-protected) may become orally fixated as an adult. It is believed that fixation in the oral stage may have one of two effects. If the child was underfed or neglected, he/she may become orally dependent and obsessed with achieving the oral stimulation of which he was deprived, learning to manipulate others to fulfill his needs rather than maturing to independence. The overly indulged child may resist growing up and try to return to that state of dependency through crying, acting helpless, demanding satisfaction, and being "needy."

Oral fixations are considered to contribute to over-eating, being overly talkative, smoking addictions, overindulging in sugar, chewing on straws and toothpicks, and even alcoholism (known as "oral dependent" qualities). Other symptoms include a sarcastic or "biting" personality (known as "oral sadistic" qualities). Some suggest a link between oral fixation with oral sex where individuals fulfill their oral gratifications through phallic and ejaculant sensations. Another indicator is constant nail biting, putting fingers in the mouth as well as biting any future sexual partners they may have.

5 Classic Movie High School that would Suck to Attend

Tempus II - Amazing Slow Motion

Unsung_Hero says...

>> ^xxovercastxx:

I think the camera angles, depth of field, view distance, background music, rate changes, mistakes, relatively low frame rate and especially the champagne ejaculation shot all made this quite mediocre in comparison to many of the slomo videos that are out there.
>> ^Unsung_Hero:
No, you have listed a bunch of neat stuff that could look cool in slow-motion. The point Yogi was trying to make is that the "art" portion of this video comes from unique camera angles, setup, different colors used (Primary), engaging background music, the switching of time-shifting, ect... were all carefully constructed to make this video intriguing. And that, my friend, is art.



I'm not sure why you quoted me on this comment, seeing as how we are discussing different subjects. I never said it was "good" art. Just done well enough to keep your attention. I agree, I've seen far better 'Slow-Mo' videos... I was simply just stating that this is in fact art (no matter how mediocre it is).



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists