Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
16 Comments
Farhad2000says...*blog *ban
siftbotsays...Sending this video to Sift Talk for discussion (sent by gold star member Farhad2000)
siftbotsays...mirkorispoli has been nominated for banination by gold star member Farhad2000. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.
wildmanBillsays...*ban, these guys should get back on the short bus.
siftbotsays...mirkorispoli has been seconded for banination by gold star member wildmanBill. This account will now be disabled. If you would like to appeal this banination, mirkorispoli, you may contact the administrators.
mlxsays...Damn, already *banned!
siftbotsays...mirkorispoli cannot be banned because mirkorispoli's account is already terminated (ignoring banination request by gold star member mlx)
gwaansays...La *banlieue c'est dangereux!!!
siftbotsays...mirkorispoli cannot be banned because mirkorispoli's account is already terminated (ignoring banination request by gold star member gwaan)
pho3n1xsays...wait, is this a self-link? or another 'sexy' video? cause seriously, it doesn't violate ANY rules. NONE.
playing devil's advocate here, but this should fall under personal opinion (ie, downvote) and not a blog/ban. if we're killing these vids and accounts due to them being swimsuit photoshoots, then I demand the fast-times clip be taken down as well. there are others with ACTUAL nudity as well, that are still on the sift.
also, NOWHERE in this thread does it say WHY the video was redacted. would be nice to know, so that our own checks-and-balances aren't bypassed. with so many gold-stars running about nowaways, i think there's a lot of action taking place that is directly caused by opinion, and not any actual violations.
bizinichisays...Yeah, what exactly was this, that it deserved a ban. if it was content, we could have just downvoted it...
pho3n1xsays...still... my point is that there was no reason given. I see a blogged video post that's been deleted, seemingly for no reason...
"redacted due to violation of self-link policy" would have been nice, and these last couple posts could have been avoided. surely i'm not the only one that feels this way...
gwaansays...I'm not sure - I just love jumping on the *band wagon!
siftbotsays...mirkorispoli cannot be banned because mirkorispoli's account is already terminated (ignoring banination request by gold star member gwaan)
Farhad2000says...We had two 250 star members sign off on this, I thought the community had more faith in long term users.
This was softcore pr0n and a self link from YouTube.
pho3n1xsays...the self-link policy is one thing. the 'softcore porn' thing doesn't fly with me, when other videos that are available on actual porn sites are allowed on the sift.
as for faith in long-term members, yes. however that doesn't mean a reason shouldn't be given...
"i do not recall."
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.