"We" found?

I smell a spammer. *ban

hollywoodshorts has been nominated for banination by volumptuous. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.

Hmmm. I'm not sure there is evidence enough to prove this to be spam.

http://twitter.com/hollywoodshorts

Selflink
*ban

hollywoodshorts has been seconded for banination by gwiz665. This account will now be disabled. If you would like to appeal this banination, hollywoodshorts, you may contact the administrators.

I fail to see how that was a self link. She posted it on twitter, then posted it here. What was the problem?

Why do I seem to agree with my old nemesis jonny so much these days? I think you bastards railroaded an innocent person.

^Yes. Let me don my blankfist cloak and remove my cheap plastic K*Mart rasch mask and say this seems to be more an exercise in power than honest sleuth work. This ban doesn't seem warranted at all.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I haven't seen the video, but is the name "hollywoodshorts" associated with the content in the video?

hollywoodshorts is the name of the person on twitter and if you notice the tweets it's clear that he or she had something to do with the zoo in question, and therefore it is reasonable to assume that the person in question had a hand in the making of the video.

Look over the tweets, most of them are about lazoo (L.A. Zoo), which is the youtube account and where the video was recorded.

More over the video had 500 views when it appeared here, which of course isn't a conclusive evidence, but suspicious.

If we jumped the gun on this one, he or she is welcome to return and complain, then we can unban her again. I doubt this will happen, because I think it is spam.

This was the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7bGyTnsO1Y

I watched and upvoted this video and I also don't think it is a self-link, the name "hollywoodshorts" wasn't associated with the content as far as I could see. In my humble opinion this banination should not occur.

Meh, I have no vested interest other than the cleanliness of the sift. Unban her and give her a chance to respond, if she does respond, we'll take it from there, if she does not, then the user is dead in the water anyway.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I will unban and give the benefit of the doubt - but I agree with Gwiz that the post was smelly.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

*discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by member dag.