Pascal's Wager.
Ittl break any complex argument down into 4 really easy to see outcomes.

Firstly, this video is entitled "The Most Terrifying Video You Will Ever See".

Secondly, the video author himself (wonderingmind42) has told people not to watch this video, because "It's just that there's a hole in this argument big enough to drive a Hummer through because of an assumption I didn't realize I had (isn't that just the way with assumptions...), and the argument has been UPDATED to address that hole."

Thirdly, the video How It All Ends is the updated video to fill in the hole of this video, incorporating the Devil's Advocate and making his argument clearer.

It's not an explicit dupe, but I'm not sure how to treat it.

Firstly secondly

I don't care, if its a dupe *discard it. And I thought it was interesting, whether the original author has any thing to say about. If he says don't watch it, then he should pull it down himself.

Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter NordlichReiter.