Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
33 Comments
johnald128says...Bush 1989-1993
Clinton 1993-1997
Clinton 1997-2001
Bush 2001-2004
Bush 2004-2008...
...another Clinton? what!?!! stop this madness!!
Any other candidate that has any likelihood of getting far in the polls is pro-war.
something more consequential is needed than a mere change of party in the 2008 elections.
Ron Paul is easily the best major candidate for President, is he perfect? hell no. But show me someone better who has even the remotest chance of taking the Oval Office.
just go and compare all the candidates and ask yourself which ones you trust, i think you'll come to the same conclusion i have.
Grimmsays...I prefer the original title for this video "Ron Paul: Our Power, Our Responsibility". I don't think the title you are using is going to grab peoples attention as we've all seen several videos already about "Ron Paul on the war with Iraq".
Constitutional_Patriotsays...FYI - Ron Paul just recently introduced the America Freedom Agenda Act to the House of Representatives listed as HR 3835:
HR 3835: America Freedom Agenda Act of 2007
Related articles:
Article by Naomi Wolf in the Huffington Post on this proposal
Article at Dailypaul.com
johnald128says...His main goal seems to be to return more power to the people, and let the individual issues shake themselves out from there. He's the only Republican candidate who has never been compromised.
his popularity is representing a legitimate threat to the stranglehold that the neo-conservatives have on the Republican Party.
Vote for him if only because the world needs the neo-conservatives out of the White House!
some more related sites:
http://www.thisnovember5th.com
http://www.ronpaul2008.com
http://www.ronpaulforpresident2008.com
http://ronpaulmania.com/ron-paul-inspires/
http://www.house.gov/paul/legis.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Ron_Paul
here's part of a speech i like where he's outlining that we've been neo-conned - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=8w_aT6L44Mg
johnald128says....
siftbotsays...Discarding this video. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 4 days.
Grimmsays...Remember, remember, the 5th of November *save
siftbotsays...Saving this video from the discard pile and sending it back to the queue for one more try; last queued Sunday, October 28th, 2007 5:09am PDT - save requested by Grimm.
johnald128says...minimum estimates report that 4.3 million dollars was donated to him yesterday. that's just one day! unfrikkinbelievable!!!
honkeytonk73says...Now will Diebold let Ron Paul's votes count? We'll have to see.
waxwing_slainsays...David Cross: "I would rather hear the death rattle of my only child than listen to that shit"
Go Paul!
Arsenault185says...Grimm, I'm impressed. Most people saw that movie with the notion that it was nothing more than entertainment purposes.
Johnald: Great Sift. Ron Paul is last in the polls only because people are scared. (i think) I would LOVE to see him as president. His views are so far off everyone else's. But thats because they are on point. This guys got a great head on his shoulders.
Grimmsays...One of the big hurdles RP has is that everyone is used to the Federal Government being so involved with everything. Like you said people are "scared" of the unknown...is it possible that things could improve if the Federal Government got out of the way and gave more control to the State and local government? I think so.
eric3579says...*dead
siftbotsays...This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by eric3579.
MarineGunrocksays...Wooo! Sock puppetry!
Johnald128, we all know damn well that you're Johnald_Chaffinch. You've said so before.
MarineGunrocksays...*discuss
siftbotsays...This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by MarineGunrock.
Fedquipsays...um this video is 7 months old, are we going that far back to sniff people out?
dotdudesays...At 7 months 4 weeks he promised to discontinue the old account. Then this video was submitted two weeks later using the old account and he voted using both accounts.
See promise here: http://www.videosift.com/talk/username-change-possible#comment-241856
LittleRedsays...Yeah, I could see punishing him for it seven months ago. Now that it's seven and a half months later, that's just ridiculous. Unless there is another more recent case, don't bring this one up. This isn't a police department. Holding something against someone for months and months is outrageous. A month or two after the fact, fine. Slap him on the wrist. Almost eight months later, forget about it. It happened too long ago.
Obsidianfiresays...LittleRed, read ^ up.
choggiesays...Tie him up, tie his pup up, slap that ass, tie Brianna up, get those cheeks a LittleRed as well, pleasure em both with dildos, film it, and let the Arizona maid sell copies a those for a dollar-fiddy a piece!!!
eric3579says...Used both accounts to vote up these videos
http://www.videosift.com/video/Demented-Birthday-Greeting (one month ago)
http://www.videosift.com/video/South-Korea-Clones-Glowing-Cats
http://www.videosift.com/video/Save-America-from-evil-men-Ron-Paul-may-be-the-answer
http://www.videosift.com/video/Ron-Paul-on-Face-the-Nation-11-11-07
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i just created a replacement account. I won't vote, comment or upload vids with my old one. is that okay?
written by Johnald_Chaffinch | 7 months 4 weeks ago | CH | quote | profile reply
▲ 0 ▼ | flag spam (0) | ignore
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This account should be removed.
LittleRedsays...Thanks boys; I got it. I was agreeing with Fedquip - um this video is 7 months old, are we going that far back to sniff people out? That's why I said "Unless there is another more recent case, don't bring this one up."
And fine. One was brought up from five weeks ago. Why didn't/don't JamesLuckyDag just disable the other account? The worst thing that's happened recently since he "promised" to stop using this account is voting twice on a video that was already published. As far as I can tell, this is the only one of his videos he's upvoted twice.
And no, I'm not interested in anal play, but thanks for the offer choggie.
choggiesays...you brought up the anal play LittleRed, I simply wanted to beat you with dildoes....
Arsenault185says...Well I just tried to ban his old account, but its starred so I can't. Forgot about that little rule.
gwiz665says...dagcious or luckycious should just ban the old account and give him a slap on the wrist; This COULD have been done on different computers, where the logins were different or something; or he simply forgot it and accidentally voted again - no backsies can have that sideeffect. Just ban the old account and be done with that.
blankfistsays...Rape him! Rape him! I mean, tickle him! Tickle him!
burdturglersays...So what was the outcome of this? He was allowed to keep his account here after using a sock puppet? Looks like it. Using a different account to vote for your own shit is no accident.
gwiz665says...Was this never resolved? I'm gonna use my executive gold 100 powers to *return it and someone can siftquisition either of johnalds accounts to get rid of it.
siftbotsays...Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by gwiz665.
8727says...o jeez, i really didn't mean to, i think after i was logging in with the new account i must have thought i never upvoted some (i didn't check as that would take forever). i haven't purposefully used the johnald128 account for a long time, i use the johnald_chaffinch one now. i did ask for the other to be deleted i think but i can't remember getting a reply. thanks
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.