80 views
2:22
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
5 Comments
articianThe message here is: don't be a mustache-douche, and people won't fuck with you at the trainstation. Deep-down inside this guy knows, and even still his subconscious manufactures these social obstacles.
Mustaches: They're just not worth it.
WeedandWeirdnessjokingly says...Hahahaha!! Mustache-douche?!? Oh geezus, I am dying over here!! I can see if I could re- purpose the footage for a Don't be a Mustache-Douche PSA. You have already given me one hell of a tagline. Now every time I see a gent with a stache, I will hear your words in Sam Watersons voice saying, "Mustaches: They're just not worth it."
The message here is: don't be a mustache-douche, and people won't fuck with you at the trainstation. Deep-down inside this guy knows, and even still his subconscious :manufactures these social obstacles.
Mustaches: They're just not worth it.
dannym3141I really like the ending.
Quality really lets it down, which seems strange they'd talk about the difficulty of producing it but not bother to spend more than 10 minutes uploading the video.
Perhaps someone could clear up my ignorance, but what is so hard to pull this 2 min scene off in a single take? Is it because people have to scoot around the back of the camera and re-appear in character?
Also does 35mm refer to the size of the pixels in the video?
WeedandWeirdnesssays...@dannym3141 Yes, it does have a lot to do with people having to scoot around the back of the camera. It can take a bit of time to choreograph all the actor blocking and camera movements. In this piece there was no dialogue or field sound captured, so it wasn't as difficult as some of the projects I remember crewing on when I was in school a hundred years ago.
Hahaha, it does kinda look like it is 35 pixels, sorry about the poor quality of the image. I found this on Youtube, and I think the transfer from film to video might not have been of the highest quality. Not sure though. I added the bit about the difficulty a single-shot like this is to get in the can.
I really like the ending.
Perhaps someone could clear up my ignorance, but what is so hard to pull this 2 min scene off in a single take? Is it because people have to scoot around the back of the camera and re-appear in character?
Also does 35mm refer to the size of the pixels in the video? Quality really lets it down, which seems strange they'd talk about the difficulty of producing it but not bother to spend more than 10 minutes uploading the video.
siftbotMoving this video to WeedandWeirdness's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.