Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
pho3n1xone of the funniest scenes in the movie.![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/smile.gif)
even more amusing if you've read the news recently.
theo47What kind of monster have I created?
There's nudity, and there's gratuitious nudity. Geez.
Gervaisesays...Ah, the slippery slope.![](https://videosift.com/vs5/emoticon/teeth.gif)
InvaderSilThat movie was lame. Good acting on Neil's part though. hah
pho3n1xsee, i knew this was going to happen. it passes the 'get off to it' test, in my opinion... but the nude magician would have made it, if i hadn't struck it down. the racecar vid with the crash caused by a flashing girl also was knocked off. i'm just saying...
i figured this would end up in the *blog , so there we go. i just think that either some consistency is in order, or the ruleset needs to be clarified.
siftbotSending this video to Sift Talk for discussion (sent by gold star member pho3n1x)
pho3n1xsorry, i didn't even see the discussion about it in the talk and the other video... my bad. i still say we need a clarification though, because it does seem that the particular rule in question is a little fuzzy. i don't mind any of it, really... but why do we have the rule if it's going to be ignored. if you wanna put that whole description of porn or not porn in that rule text then feel free, but it's just going to confuse people.
and with that, i *discard , because apparently i missed the meeting.
siftbotSelf-discarding this post (discard called by original submitter pho3n1x)
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.