You should research your sources Blankfist. John Stossel is a reporter who basically makes his living going against the grain under the guise of being an advocacy journalist. I would take anything he presents with a grain of salt.

In 2001, FAIR criticized Stossel's reportage of global warming in his documentary, "Tampering with Nature," for using "highly elective...information" that gave "center stage to three dissenters from among the 2,000 members of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which recently released a report stating that global temperatures are rising almost twice as fast as previously thought.

^It's a good thing that comment wasn't dripping with self-righteous smugness.

John Stossel has all the journalistic ingtegrity of Miss Cleo the phone psychic.

This post has been removed from the Eco channel by channel owner fissionchips. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Moving this video to blankfist's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Man-made global warming would be an amusing delusion of politicized "scientists" and power-mad politicians weren't so hellbent on becoming tyrants "in the public interest".

Lots should be replaced by minority.

My biggest problem here is the way he discusses the data. Or the brief moment, where he discusses the data. I am not convinced by his discussion... I would have to look at the data myself, by that I mean look at it in data analysis software. You can't just take to frames form a movie and overlay them to make a conclusion, that is nonsense.

No doubt there is some uncertain on both axis, I think the point of the plot was to say they are correlated. My impression is that it is not an essential point which one comes first.

His panel of experts are well-known for their opinion. John Christy, Spencer, and I think maybe Ryder, all published results on satellite data in Nature, which suggested global cooling. Unfortunately, they had errors in their data analysis, and it had to be reanalyzed and corrected. The errata actually shows warming.

So it is very much dependent on when this was taped.

What I would have liked to Stossel report on is can anything really be done about global warming or should it be? I think even these scientist would agree with that... in fact I know they do.

"The debate is over!"

Awesome. Is that democracy and objectivity?
I cant believe what is going on... everywhere you look people are treating our very living ideology like crap.
I always feared that like 80% of people are completely stupid, now I am sure... I cant believe people believe that crap... FFS why is it so hard to learn from history for mankind? Nobody can call themselves intelligent, if they are too stupid to learn from simple history...