Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
5 Comments
oxdottirsays...Better graphics, but remarkably similar to what my uneducated grandmother would say in between deploring "kids these days" and offering you cookies. There are way better arguments if you really want to convince someone, depending on what you want to convince them. I think you are going to have a tough job if you want to convince someone evolution doesn't exist, but if you just want to convince someone it isn't incompatible with a specific religion or religion in general, you can do better.
If I were a legal downvoter, I would be doin' it now.
cobaltsays...Looks like she fell into the exact same trap that most creationists do: completely ignoring fact and choosing alternative definitions for scientific words.
Most creationsists I've met at least admit that micro-evolution takes place simply because we can observe it directly. This woman would have us turn a blind eye to all domesticated animals.
theaceofclubzsays...*discard
siftbotsays...Discarding this post - discard requested by original submitter theaceofclubz.
gwiz665says...Pff... diarrhea of the mouth.
I like the closing argument; "it is clear that natural selection cannot make new species, and that all species are therefore created by god". What kind of hocus-pocus argument is that?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.