Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
kulpims*promote
siftbotPromoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Tuesday, April 26th, 2011 11:39am PDT - promote requested by kulpims.
DeanoGiven that I've lost my mum and a close friend to cancer I vote yes. I'll have the anti-fat gene as well please.
gwiz665*quality *doublepromote
siftbotBoosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by gwiz665.
Double-Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Tuesday, April 26th, 2011 5:00pm PDT - doublepromote requested by gwiz665.
thealiThis is BioShock in the making!
bamdrewI find these bio-ethicist talks super-boring.
"Hello. This one guy did this great experiment like 5 years ago. I'm going to now take the obvious extension of this work and act like I'm the first person to realize that we could soon be doing this in humans... But wait!... Should we do this is humans?! Ok, thats my time, thanks."
bamdrew... to continue my previous rant, ... these bio-ethicists like to paint the pictures like we understand waaay more than we actually do about genetics and epigenetics.
Many medical researchers are still afraid (appropriately, in my mind) that the various stem cell treatment and gene therapies will actually give people cancers in the long term.
chilaxe@bamdrew
Lots of stuff is working in the lab. It takes a long time to bring it into clinical use, though. Any impediments like increased cancer rates will be solved in time. Even small medical advances can be miraculous when you're going to die otherwise. People are, though, free to refuse new medical treatments and die, if that's their desire.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.