Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
14 Comments
schmawyInterview with my favorite open minded skeptics at The Paracast...
http://www.theparacast.com/podcasts/paracast_091011.mp3
schmawyOh have mercy Rembar's watching. Refreshing frequently to see if it makes the cut for the science channel. This is sort of like peer review.
rembarStrange sexual encounters with odd humanoid females makes not an alien encounter....why, if I were to relate you my activities just this past Saturday....
*nochannel
*books
*downunder
*talks
*controversy
siftbotThis video has been removed from all channels (Science, Books, Downunder, Talks, Controversy) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by rembar. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.
Adding video to channels (Books, Controversy, Downunder, Talks) - requested by rembar.
schmawyAw Rembar you're just saying it's not science because of your beliefs aren't you? Can science not be used in the investigation of paranormal claims?
schmawyI'm sure you expected me to make a stink, Rembar. First let me say I'm really happy you're back around rigourously reviewing science channel submissions, I have tried to work to that end in your stead.
That being said, the video I submitted seems to comply by the description of the channel where it states
So although this video is not strictly about science, it describes the use of scientific tools and methodology to investigate extraordinary claims. There are always cries for evidence whenever the paranormal is claimed, yet we're denied the use of science's process in trying to provide it?
Please set me straight less I think your personal biases are interfering with your channel administration!
rembarIncredible claims require incredible evidence. Some rando yammering away for 10 minutes without any attempt to add credulity to his out-of-left-field claims using any evidence, hell, even other testimony, does not deserve time in the Science channel.
And yes, for the record I am biased due to a severe allergy to bullshit.
schmawyOkay, so long as you admit it. Again, nice to have you back around Rembar.
dagComment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
Welcome back Rembar.
silvercord*long
siftbotVideo is already flagged long - ignoring long request by silvercord.
siftbotMoving this video to schmawy's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
choggie*promote
siftbotPromoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by choggie.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.