Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
19 Comments
MINKwow cool advert at the end.
siftbotMoving this video to doogle's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
doogle*beg
siftbotSending this video to Beggar's Canyon to plea for a little attention - beg requested by original submitter doogle.
spoco2*dead
siftbotOnly published videos may be flagged dead - ignoring dead request by spoco2.
doogle*dead
siftbotThere was a problem completing dead request.
doogleInteresting - worthy of a *discuss?
siftbotThis video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by doogle.
burdturglerYou can't flag a queued video dead because then you'd have non-published videos in the dead pool.
Then you'd have people getting star points for fixing videos that haven't even sifted.
Since you're the owner of this video, you can change the embed or discard it.
blankfistChoogle.
burdturglerYou know what's really interesting about this?
By discussing this you extended your queue.
You submitted another video after discussing this one.
Now all you have to do is correct the embed and return this and you will have four in the queue instead of three.
Not that I really give a shit ... but at least there's something to discuss now.
doogleBurdturgler - thanks for the clarification on your points. I will now *return this.
On your point #1 - yes, it makes sense to me that unsifted videos should be *discarded instead of invoked *.dead.
Re your point #2 - well this vid isn't in my queue, so returning it won't extend my queue, however that may be true (and thus interesting). I don't dare to try though (and risk getting another insulting chog-related slap from blankfist).
You're rising up pretty fast there burdturgler. Good to see you again.
siftbotOther invocations (return) cannot be called when discarding a post - ignoring nonsensical requests by doogle.
doogle*discard
siftbotDiscarding this post - discard requested by original submitter doogle.
burdturglerI hadn't noticed the posted date, sorry. But yes, does look like it would have extended the queue if this was newer.
In any event, I'm not sure why you chose to discard this instead of just returning it to your p-queue and fixing the embed code some other time.
doogle^ full of good ideas you.
I guess I'll just have to wait for the *undiscard invocation.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.