Interesting Points... Comments?

Part Two Here: http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=14924&where=queue

GAR-BAGE. It's enfuriating the war Fox is waging against education and intelligence.

Regardless who's hosting this show (Fox, NBC, whatever) that's not the point... These are valid arguments. There's absolutely nothing wrong with challenging what we believe and know. That's how we evolve. What if we didn't challenge the common belief that the earth was flat?

Where would we be? Probably watching it on VideoSift: Controversy: Is the Earth Really Flat? (Shown on FOX)

:-P~

Good general thumb rule, "Truth is always stranger than fiction." Journalists are on auto-pilot-Fox, CNN, Ntworks, all are sheit. If you think what you watch on the box is for your edification, education, and evolution....you are a putty- It is plain and simple, diversion. Might as well pick yer fav team, or gladiator.
Everthing you know is wrong is good place to start from...It's highly likely we are still on the moon-

Ever heard about the Lunar laser ranging experiment?

There is a mirror on the moon that the bounce a laser off... If they can get a mirror there I'm sure they can get a lunar lander. Its all just a matter of physics.

You may be able to fool 3/4 of the US population, but i'm pretty sure Russia would have had independant verification of the moon landings.

If you would believe the moon landing is a fake, then i guess we didn't just buzz saturn either, or don't really have robots on Mars.

The 3 major arguments are..
1)No stars in the footage
2)Flag waving with no atmosphere
3)No blast crater under the lander.

Lets analyze that closely.
1)No stars in the footage because of the contrasting brightness of the moons surface and the short exposure time of the film camera.

2)The flag does move, but only after it was placed, and any material in micro gravity will hold its momentum for a long period especially with no atmospheric drag.

3)No blast crater under the lander is the most stupid thing i've ever heard. Ok at first, your mind goes hey wow there is a powerful rocket on the bottom of the lander. What you have to realise is the lander comes in very slowly, doing most of its deceleration before touchdown, which it ends up doing at about 1 foot per second.

No vote; won't even bother watching.

Do you really think that America's primary competitor in the space race, Russia, would have sat idly by while a hoax was pervaded on the entire planetary populace? Ask yourself if they wouldn't notice the distinct lack of a rocket's radar signature. Beyond just Russia, there were other nations in the race. Why were they silent? What about all of the professional astronomers - ho paid them off? And the amateurs?

Please lay this conspiracy theory to rest. There are better ones out there.

*discard

Self-discarding this video (discard called by original submitter bnsa)