Rad avatar. I dig his philosophy.

Haha, well, I could tell from your reply -- but still, I felt it prudent enough to articulate my eccentricity versus being some type of random hate pee'er.

In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
no need to apologize, i thought it was funny.
ive been through some shit but really im MOSTLY well adjusted and still have a sense of humor. and it happens to be pretty raunchy. im really not a hypersensitve feminazi. promise.

In reply to this comment by poolcleaner:
I have no sense of restraint, nor proper judgment in polite society. Just watched the generation M video you posted, along with your comments and said to myself, "Wow, that's probably the last person in the world I should have said 'I'm going to pee all over your face' to."

Though you did take it like a sport, I'm going to apologize anyway. A rarity, I might add. But, still, fuck you for saying I've lost my mind.

In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
... daddy??

In reply to this comment by poolcleaner:
In reply to this comment by peggedbea:

I have no sense of restraint, nor proper judgment in polite society. Just watched the generation M video you posted, along with your comments and said to myself, "Wow, that's probably the last person in the world I should have said 'I'm going to pee all over your face' to."

Though you did take it like a sport, I'm going to apologize anyway. A rarity, I might add. But, still, fuck you for saying I've lost my mind.

In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
... daddy??

In reply to this comment by poolcleaner:
I'm going to pee all over your face.

In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
have you all lost your minds?

I'm going to pee all over your face.

In reply to this comment by peggedbea:
have you all lost your minds?

Best avatar ever, though I see several others have pointed that out -- it's true!

Isn't it sad? I like to pretend George Lucas died in the early 1980s. Helps me sleep at night.

Prequels? What are you smoking; Lucas died in '83.

In reply to this comment by rychan:
The acting was indeed terrible, but I still think all three of these movies were 90% of the way to being really excellent, if someone could have just told George Lucas which of his ideas were terrible. And obviously someone else should have directed.

The terrible acting and dialogue from that kid, from Jar-Jar, and even from Natalie Portman just cancel out all of the "wow cool" stuff that is legitimately there.

Ha... ha... ahahahahahahahahahahahaah -- monkey warriors!

In reply to this comment by JiggaJonson:
I've heard about these in the military for years. In fact, the army is, right now, breeding a huge amount of Monkey Warriors which in many cases work out better than human soldiers because:

-You can pay then in bananas
-Less raw materials required to make tiny monkey body armor
-U.S. citizens care less about the phrase "50 Monkey Warriors were killed in Iraq today" than a similar phrase about human soldiers.

So you're one of thooose nerds.

In reply to this comment by jwray:
As a TNG fan, I have to downvote this. This has images from the show, but it doesn't have what made it TNG. It feels so empty.

I rofl'd excessively over your recently promoted Cannibal Corpse video summary. Thank you. I'll have to try that.

How's post-apocalyptia goin', 101?

I second that. Excellent work. It was a lot of fun hangin' out with you at ze Sift Up.

>> ^Farhad2000:
Excellent job on editing and working with the Nikon D90 I must say! Bravo.
In reply to this comment by youdiejoe:
my vid
http://www.vimeo.com/2798928

What Eric said. Stop on by any time, pinks.

No, but you're awfully hostile towards one who admits his faults as perceived by others in a humorous attempt at 1. Making a friend, and 2. Pleading for assistance.

I have this terrible fault where I like everyone. (I have to say that up front, otherwise people -- and it's happened, I have had a gun pointed at me just for saying hi (imagine that?) -- because people misunderstand my intentions -- which are good, I assure you.) Can't help it, I simply like everyone. Sorry if I offended you -- I tend to do that, BUT I make up for my somewhat nonsensical, confrontational, salutatory nature by smiling, laughing A LOT and being melodically paranoid about every idea I've ever learned.

'Course, it's difficult for me to articulate that aspect of my being, so I simply say whatever's on the top of my mind combined with whatever ails me, and hope (pray?) that I'm not misunderstood. Luckily it's the internets, so I (hopefully) won't get shot over a misunderstanding. (That is entirely hypothetical, and has no bearing on you being a marine -- hell, I live in a mixed military family: marines, air force and navy, so worry not. I respect you for it, though I myself wish never to do battle.)

However! I still wish for your friendship AND help. Sorry. Apologies. (I was intrigued by your profile, so that explains that... I think. /end parenthetical

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
I'm sorry? Was that some attempt at an insult?

In reply to this comment by poolcleaner:
My Google-fu is poorly developed, I like insulting Christians, and I've never been to Iraq, so, please, Mr. Gunrock, help a stupid person find this video.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
On here.

My Google-fu is poorly developed, I like insulting Christians, and I've never been to Iraq, so, please, Mr. Gunrock, help a stupid person find this video.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
On here.

"...ascribing to himself every human excellence; & believing he never claimed any other" is THE most important aspect of his quote. Jesus as a philosopher human, not a deity.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

Believing in the supernatural does not lift your ideas above that of any other human rational. Only the supernatural being itself could be above human rational, and until they or it (if they or it exists) reveal themselves there's really nothing more that we can say. We can only document what we observe, and make opinions of the philosophies we perceive.

~Pool

In reply to this comment by Sniper007:
Poolcleaner,

In common usage, the accusation of "quoting out of context" contains the implication that the phrase as quoted caries a significantly different meaning than that held in the larger portion of the work from which it was taken. The quotes you provided do not demonstrate this disparity. The truncated parts do not substantially effect the fact that Jefferson was very much a follower of Jesus Christ and his doctrines.

It is, of course, ridiculous to claim that one could claim to believe in God without believing in the Supernatural. He (God) is the singular greatest person whose existence defines the term Supernatural.

One must of course recognize the fundamental need for a Supernatural Principal Instigator if that person is to discuss the philosophy and doctrines decreed by that Instigator. Every sequential thought concerning this God need not be, and indeed, cannot be severed from mans ratiocination.

All too often this is the nature of the straw man proffered by those who would disparage the whole of the Bible. They see an act of faith in the recognition of a supreme God, and insist that every thought thereafter must also be of the same nature. While many in so called Christendom may have abandoned their minds long ago in their pursuit of Spiritualism, it is not logically necessary to do so. Rather, I would argue the Bible contains admonitions against such abandonment.

I would disagree with Jefferson on several points concerning his theology, but for the purposes of our conversation, the points upon which I do agree are of greater import. To wit: "Of all the systems of morality, ancient or modern, which have come under my observation, none appear to me so pure as that of Jesus."

It is very important to question everything, but a question is worthless without the right answer.