search results matching tag: rollback
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
- 1
- »
Videos (8) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (22) |
- 1
- »
Videos (8) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (22) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
simonm (Member Profile)
Your video, The Check In: Betsy DeVos' Rollback of Civil Rights, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
The Check In: Betsy DeVos' Rollback of Civil Rights
That only works if there's equality in lower/mid level education, giving all students a reasonable opportunity for quality education before that SAT testing, and there is not.
Low income district schools are at a distinct disadvantage in funding, facilities, and availability of assistance, as are low income students. Female students have, historically, been discouraged from pursuing science and math, especially at high levels.
Equality of opportunity at least to a reasonably competent base level of education is considered a civil right. Because we are still far from reaching that ideal, rolling back programs designed to address the continued shortfalls IS a rollback of civil right protections in the same way rolling back civil right protections in our election system was a rollback of the voting rights for a large, specifically targeted population which led instantly to attempts to return to old, clearly discriminatory practices designed to deny voting rights.
From the outside looking in though, requiring diversity of genders and races by law is the issue.
If we simplify student quality down to only their SAT scores, what is the fair and equitable method of picking the 100 students that get admitted for the upcoming year?
Here's what I think a color-blind non-racist equal opportunity minded admission process looks like. Sort the students by SAT score and admit the top 100.
Looking at the comments from the left, by example the Daily Show video jabs above, the process I described is considered a rollback of hard fought civil rights.
???
The Check In: Betsy DeVos' Rollback of Civil Rights
From the outside looking in though, requiring diversity of genders and races by law is the issue.
If we simplify student quality down to only their SAT scores, what is the fair and equitable method of picking the 100 students that get admitted for the upcoming year?
Here's what I think a color-blind non-racist equal opportunity minded admission process looks like. Sort the students by SAT score and admit the top 100.
Looking at the comments from the left, by example the Daily Show video jabs above, the process I described is considered a rollback of hard fought civil rights.
???
As to affirmative action, keep in mind the specific case mentioned was about reversing sexual discrimination too, not just race and class. How, exactly, they think public institutions can achieve the diversity of genders and races many are required by law to achieve without looking at gender or race is beyond me.
Cop-Killer Suspect Lunges
>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
Amazing, cause I was just thinking that I'd pay good money to watch a gang of police officers use excessive force on you.
Just remember, any officer is well within his or her right to kick, punch, taze, pile-drive, or shoot you in the back in order to ensure your compliance.
No matter how trivia the violation. (tag light out, no rollback after stopping, etc.)..
p.s.- i hear breathing and blinking and begging for mercy are very threatening and can be considered "resisting arrest".
You might wanna avoid doing those things if at all possible.
>> ^lantern53:
I would pay real money to watch some of you people do the work of police or jail officers.
Wrong, wrong, and wrong. But I see where you're coming from.
Cop-Killer Suspect Lunges
Amazing, cause I was just thinking that I'd pay good money to watch a gang of police officers use excessive force on you.
Just remember, any officer is well within his or her right to kick, punch, taze, pile-drive, or shoot you in the back in order to ensure your compliance.
No matter how trivia the violation. (tag light out, no rollback after stopping, etc.)..
p.s.- i hear breathing and blinking and begging for mercy are very threatening and can be considered "resisting arrest".
You might wanna avoid doing those things if at all possible.
>> ^lantern53:
I would pay real money to watch some of you people do the work of police or jail officers.
Oh no! It just had to be a female driver again..
Tags for this video have been changed from 'parking garage, uphill, reverse, slip' to 'parking garage, uphill start, reverse, slip, rollback, manual, standard transmission' - edited by calvados
Bitcoin - Course Crashed On Mt. Gox : 17,5 Dollars to 1 Cent
Yeah, and even then it wasn't "hacked" as such. Read about it here: https://support.mtgox.com/entries/20208066-huge-bitcoin-sell-off-due-to-a-compromised-account-rollback
Obama Voters For Ron Paul
RoPaul is a pipe dream without a pipe. Here's the deal, coming from someone (me) who agrees with Paul on most things.
The average American has been rendered ignorant of history and economics. 60 years of union-run government schools will do that to you.
Ron Paul sez, "Get rid of the Fed." No one even knows what the Fed is or why it is, and they don't care to learn. How are you going to free people from shackles they can't even see?
Ron Paul sez, "Let's return all our military to the homeland..." The unfinished part of that sentence is "...so Red China can build their own bases where we were."
But let's assume Paul actually makes it to the White House. How is one man going to tell Congress, a bunch of petty, grasping, emotionally-insecure motherfkers, however useless they are to you and me, to voluntarily give up 90% of their power and strip them of the ability to buy votes from their districts with federal pork. And that's just them, excluding the powers behind their thrones, the lobbies, the corporatists, etc.
So the people behind Paul's election (you and me) are going to save us, you say?
Historically speaking, whatever the Cause, a third of the people are For, a third Against, and a third doesn't give a sh1t either way. The people who depend on Congress for handouts--corporations and "public" unions both--aren't going to go quietly to projects they have to pay for upfront, or lower-paying (aka non-taxpayer-funded) jobs based on merit and market demand. Remember Wisconsin?
Do you understand that the media is still 95% leftist (statist)? That FOX has barely been around and is inconsequential? All the horseshit and calamity and LIES the left manufactures ("Uh, there's a Recovery going on!") will be turned against Paul like a magnifying glass against ants. The leftmedia isn't going to patiently explain what libertarianism is to the masses. I can't even begin to imagine the level of hysteria.
THE LIBERTARIANS ARE GOING TO TAKE AWAY YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY! NO MORE MEDICARE, THEY'LL STACK THE DYING ELDERLY IN THE GUTTERS! CAMPS! THEY WANT LEGALIZED DRUGS SO THE FIENDS CAN RUN WILD IN THE STREETS! THEY ARE ANARCHISTS!
I hate saying all this sh1t, because most of Paul's Constitutional rollback is what we really need. But it just ain't gonna happen. Right now the oxen (the people) are STILL dumb and comfortable, even with 5-dollar gas, rising food costs and 22% unemployment. Ron Paul would be assassinated right after the unlikely event that he was even nominated.
rEVOLution without bloodshed? Not on the scale Paul, you and I want. Even if we do nothing, it's going to go to guns, maybe not next year but in the next ten for sure. NOT reelecting the kenyan asshole would help, but for the kind of change that's needed, a state or states will have to say, "Enough tyranny, DC" and secede, which they have every right to do.
Psychologic (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your comment has just received enough votes from the community to earn you 1 Power Point. Thank you for your quality contribution to VideoSift.
Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test
I avoided this clip because I kept thinking to myself how could a ski-lift rollback be interesting enough to watch 3+ minutes of it... needless to say I was rather stunned once I actually watched it.
Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test
Paul is dead, or at least he would have been if he were on the lift.>> ^arvana:
I think I see the problem here. They're running a 33⅓ ski lift at 45. Backwards.
Stonebreaker (Member Profile)
Congratulations! Your video, Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test, has reached the #1 spot in the current Top 15 New Videos listing. This is a very difficult thing to accomplish but you managed to pull it off. For your contribution you have been awarded 2 Power Points.
This achievement has earned you your "Golden One" Level 15 Badge!
Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test
>> ^Psychologic:
This was part of several tests to better understand the forces involved during catastrophic failure events.
In this particular test they were wanting to see what kind of acceleration would occur with the low speed gear completely disconnected. Unfortunately the stop button they used was the one that controlled the part they disconnected rather than the brake, so the level of destruction was mostly inadvertent.
The full video is here. The description for this test starts at 4:26.
http://videosift.com/video/Dangerous-Ski-Chairlift-Rollback-During-Test
Stonebreaker (Member Profile)
Your video, Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
Dangerous Ski Chairlift Rollback During Test
>> ^AeroMechanical:
Yep. That's why you test them.
I don't know. I think this would add an interesting dynamic to an ever-evolving sport. I'd be interested to see what those crazy extreme sporters would try with this.