search results matching tag: panorama
» channel: nordic
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (64) | Sift Talk (2) | Blogs (7) | Comments (111) |
Videos (64) | Sift Talk (2) | Blogs (7) | Comments (111) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
alien_concept (Member Profile)
Thanks for posting it. Ive been anticipating it since the trailer you sifted.
In reply to this comment by alien_concept:
Now you're just spoiling me! Can't blame you though, got lucky in submitting this gem first. Thanks again, mate
In reply to this comment by geo321:
*quality documentary.
Ryjkyj (Member Profile)
THANK YOU!!
In reply to this comment by Ryjkyj:
*PROMOTE
geo321 (Member Profile)
Now you're just spoiling me! Can't blame you though, got lucky in submitting this gem first. Thanks again, mate
In reply to this comment by geo321:
*quality documentary.
littledragon_79 (Member Profile)
It is exciting! Thanks a lot
In reply to this comment by littledragon_79:
*promote for the excitement!
LarsaruS (Member Profile)
I unblocked it
In reply to this comment by LarsaruS:
region *blocked
Microsoft Cashes in on Double Rainbow Meme
>> ^rychan:
>> ^westy:
Windows live photogalery , for people to thick to download "thegimp" or get photo shop,
of course if wlphotogalery is good then thats cool , but if its annything like windows movi maker then its an epic fail, windows movi maker has just got progresavely worse .
Microsoft has good automatic panorama construction tools, because they have some of the best minds in computer vision and computer graphics in their interactive visual media research group:
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/interactivevisualmedia/
Panorama stitching is only trivial if
1) The scene is completely static.
2) The optical center of the camera doesn't translate.
3) The intrinsic camera parameters (focal length, exposure time, flash) don't change
4) The scene has sufficient texture to recover the relative transformations between the images.
5) The camera has no vignetting or barrel distortion.
6) There are no gaps between the captures images.
Typically (and in this scenario) few of these constraints are satisfied so you actually end up with a computer-vision-hard problem. You could have duplicate objects that have shifted position between image captures. You could have the sun come out from behind a cloud between the first and last photograph. You could have the camera translate (as it always will when being hand held, unless you're shooting something really far away in which the translation won't matter, but even in this case it might matter for the foreground).
But sure, go ahead and fire up gimp and show me how it handles all of this automatically.
as i said if its good fair enoughf , but bassing things on , other windows free programs its likely to be shit.
Microsoft Cashes in on Double Rainbow Meme
>> ^westy:
Windows live photogalery , for people to thick to download "thegimp" or get photo shop,
of course if wlphotogalery is good then thats cool , but if its annything like windows movi maker then its an epic fail, windows movi maker has just got progresavely worse .
Microsoft has good automatic panorama construction tools, because they have some of the best minds in computer vision and computer graphics in their interactive visual media research group:
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/groups/interactivevisualmedia/
Panorama stitching is only trivial if
1) The scene is completely static.
2) The optical center of the camera doesn't translate.
3) The intrinsic camera parameters (focal length, exposure time, flash) don't change
4) The scene has sufficient texture to recover the relative transformations between the images.
5) The camera has no vignetting or barrel distortion.
6) There are no gaps between the captured images.
Typically (and in this scenario) few of these constraints are satisfied so you actually end up with a computer-vision-hard problem. You could have duplicate objects that have shifted position between image captures. You could have the sun come out from behind a cloud between the first and last photograph. You could have the camera translate (as it always will when being hand held, unless you're shooting something really far away in which the translation won't matter, but even in this case it might matter for the foreground).
But sure, go ahead and fire up gimp and show me how it handles all of this automatically.
Red Dead Redemption timelapse: "World in Motion"
>> ^shole:
how the hell did they film these without the damn radscorpi- er, i mean, mountainlions killing him in the first five minutes
They said something about a "panorama" mode in the article.
Incredible new Photoshop tool: Content-Aware Fill
Yeah, the desert and mountain/sky panorama set off my bullshit alarm.
I won't believe it until I can plug in my own photos.
Incredible new Photoshop tool: Content-Aware Fill
^Nevermind the desert. How about the panorama of the mountain?
Incredible new Photoshop tool: Content-Aware Fill
brought to you by Seetharaman Narayanan
[edit] ok got to the desert and panorama part... i have a hard time beleiving that...
17 Gigapixel Photo
If anybody want's to see a 18 gigapixel 360 degree panorama of Prague you can find it here.
Drift
Looks realy good but for me there are To manny artifacts from Time warping , im sure if u did it with a cuple more frames you could achive the same video and affect but without the glitch artifacts. also Would be good with music rather than the digetic sound track but its not like the sound dosent work
when it works its pritty cool though for example Works perfectly with panorama shots , where the time shift antilogarithm can realy perform without glitching so much.
Japan in Autumn - (autumn)
I've been to all those places and then some. The wife and kid are going to Japan to see the wife's family this week and staying for some 3 weeks. I was to go, but had to cancel due to work obligations. I am rather upset about it actually.
If you get a chance. Go. Miyajima is very beautiful. If you time it right, you can see some amayzing 'No' plays. Go up the big hill there to see the monkeys. I spent a night in the area. It is worth it. Easy access to Hiroshima across the water. See the war museum (a humbling experience). Try Hiroshima style Okonomiyaki for lunch. Great stuff.
Fuji was also a wonderful trip. I spent 4 days at a Ryokan. Amazing traditional food. Bathhouse, and everywhere in was views of the mountain. From the room, the bathhouse, everywhere. Expensive, but worth every single darn penny. Also went up Fuji for some CRAZY panoramas. You do not have to go to the top to get amazing views. Easy to get a bus ride up to about the half way mark. Great for the young or old, or those who cannot hike the mountain. Shelter and services are there. Don't be fooled. It is a HUGE mountain you will be above the cloud line most likely. See the sunrise. It is something to not be missed. Scream banzai as the sun rises (leave the old WW2 movie prejudices behind.. shouting banzai has nothing to do with dive bombing).
Other places to see. Kyoto (temples, Maiko dance), Himeji (amazing castle), Nara (giant Buddha, temples, and wandering deer). If you can.. go west towards Beppu and Nagasaki. The Kyushu area has the best natural hot spas. Nagasaki has great seafood and fusion with Chinese and Dutch influences. The war museum is also a must stop. Learn a bit about the US and Australian POW's interned in a camp there that were killed by the 'bomb', which we in the west simply do not learn about in school.
Learn a bit of the language, absorb the culture. Have fun. It is easier to get around Japan than you realize. Most major train lines and roads in the larger cities have English lettering to help tourists.
Food isn't that expensive, and bargain hotels can be found easily enough. Even better if you know a local to tour you around!
Green Screen - What you see is an illusion
Note folks most of these aren't cg graphics but rather digital panoramas. (Especially those like the last that were placed in a very well known city or area of the world.)
But even still I had no idea so many shots were green-screen. I didn't realize it was so heavily used in television.