>> ^blankfist:

>> ^Peroxide:
Actually blankfist, go to Somalia, I bet you won't get food poisoning there... Or vise versa, if we all stop paying taxes, food poisoning shouldn't be a problem anymore.
How does arguing about the inefficiencies of government show that taxes are theft? It merely shows that your government is inefficient.

Actually, Peroxide, go to Nazi Germany. I bet you'll find the big government nanny state is to your liking there. Or maybe you'd prefer someone like Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini?
Also, I live in Los Angeles now for over ten years. They're about as big a nanny state as you could ask for in the entire USA, and, yes, the government here is terribly inefficient. They take (I meant steal) more money than most other cities in this country, yet they're claiming to be bankrupt. Yes, very inefficient.
So, let me ask you, if the state or city takes money from you in exchange for services, and that exchange of course is compulsory and nonnegotiable, and they take a king's ransom (nearly 10% on sales tax alone), yet cut services because they can't afford not to, how is that not a dereliction of duty? Furthermore, how's compulsory extraction of money not theft?


Try Norway. It's really nice up there.

Nazi germany was socialist-in-name-only. They banned unions/strikes and never had any significant welfare programs. They were virulently anti-communist. The only nationalization of industries was for the wartime production of military goods.

>> ^Peroxide:

Actually blankfist, go to Somalia, I bet you won't get food poisoning there... Or vise versa, if we all stop paying taxes, food poisoning shouldn't be a problem anymore.
How does arguing about the inefficiencies of government show that taxes are theft? It merely shows that your government is inefficient.


Actually, Peroxide, go to Nazi Germany. I bet you'll find the big government nanny state is to your liking there. Or maybe you'd prefer someone like Pol Pot, Stalin, Mao, Mussolini?

Also, I live in Los Angeles now for over ten years. They're about as big a nanny state as you could ask for in the entire USA, and, yes, the government here is terribly inefficient. They take (I meant steal) more money than most other cities in this country, yet they're claiming to be bankrupt. Yes, very inefficient.

So, let me ask you, if the state or city takes money from you in exchange for services, and that exchange of course is compulsory and nonnegotiable, and they take a king's ransom (nearly 10% on sales tax alone), yet cut services because they can't afford not to, how is that not a dereliction of duty? Furthermore, how's compulsory extraction of money not theft?

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.

>> ^quantumushroom:

What does this clown's being a pastor have to do with anything? Why that's like blaming chairman mao and stalin for being murderous tyrants because they were atheists.


Hi QM, I think you missed my point entirely. The term murderous tyrant most definitely describes the actions of a Mao or Stalin. Thanks anyway.

What does this clown's being a pastor have to do with anything? Why that's like blaming chairman mao and stalin for being murderous tyrants because they were atheists.

>> ^TangledThorns:

Maddow should ask why her ratings and MSNBC's in general are so bad. I betcha it's because nobody likes to watch a close minded snarky liberal who wears the same outfit everyday like she was Chairman Mao. +1 goes to O'Reilly again.


Retarded.

Maybe it's because smart people don't watch network news, while the idiots are glued to Fox 24/7?

FYI: NPR's ratings are 20.9 million. Yeah, that liberal bastion beats the pants off all your wingnut hero's.

>> ^TangledThorns:

Maddow should ask why her ratings and MSNBC's in general are so bad. I betcha it's because nobody likes to watch a close minded snarky liberal who wears the same outfit everyday like she was Chairman Mao. +1 goes to O'Reilly again.


I hope this was sarcasm...y'know to go with the whole ad hominem/populum thing.

>> ^TangledThorns:

Maddow should ask why her ratings and MSNBC's in general are so bad. I betcha it's because nobody likes to watch a close minded snarky liberal who wears the same outfit everyday like she was Chairman Mao. +1 goes to O'Reilly again.

HAHA!! You're dumb. Maybe that's why FOX Entertainment has high ratings--the majority of the people are willfully ignorant, easily-brainwashed, intellectually devoid idiots who lack the ability to form their own opinions, and, therefore, rely on organizations such as Fox to tell them what they think because the world is just so darned confusing and hostile. That, and they're lazy, and thinking for themselves seems like over-exertion.

Or it could be that people are just afraid to admit certain things about themselves and the world around them...

Maddow should ask why her ratings and MSNBC's in general are so bad. I betcha it's because nobody likes to watch a close minded snarky liberal who wears the same outfit everyday like she was Chairman Mao. +1 goes to O'Reilly again.

I don't think communism was complete shit.

Russia and China were basically big, third-world countries until they adopted some form of communism, after which they became very strong, very fast (in relative terms).

I think the absolutist nature of extreme communism was self-destructive, i.e. the idea that nobody could ever own private property. I see the same self-destructiveness in capitalist models that shun the idea of anything being public.

And if it weren't for the sociopathic nature of Stalin and Mao who knows how much farther it could have gone? Maybe it would have evolved.

It's much more complicated than that, of course, but much...if not most...of the anti-government, anti-collectivist folklore is just that: a set of myths perpetuated by entities who see such things as a threat to their bottom line.

DIDI MAO! DIDI MAO!!!!

"The unreliability of the machine, like the randomness of the die, is a part of the game. The pleasure comes not from watching the machine work, but from watching your friends fail."
- Mao Soo, "The Delicate Zen of Mousetrap"

Chris Matthews is just like Hitler, Stalin, and Mao combined because he engages in false equivalence.

>> ^westy:

Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)


You can`t label famine and bad economic policies as genocide. And no, you can`t blame Bush (2003 - Present) for genocide, just because a lot of Iraqis died in the war and following it. If a war is fought with a country of course a lot of people from that country of the same ethnicity will die. If you call that genocide then every war will be genocide. That`s just stupid.

You moron , I have seen the full series how about you engage your brain gears.

the piont is the nazies didnt get away with it and they fucked it up , they could have exsploited the laber far more efficently ,

all the clever countries now are getting away with it , exploiting the 3rd world is how its ment to be done.
the nazies just didnt have the imaginatoin to do it properly.

the advantage of doing things totaly overseeies with the most deprived natoins is that no other natoins give a shit and the populatoins of the natoin your raping are evan more poweless to do annything , becuse they dont know anny better and allso they are to far islated from the controlers to do annything.

allso its a waist of money and time puting them all in camps and killing them all , why not let them maintain themselfs just make sure you keep it so they can never be in a positoin to actualy earn the true amount of income they deserve.

The reasoin the germans faild is the top brass was so concernd in setting up a new rome/empire. im sure if they had got away with it everyone would hail the germans as sucsesfull conqerors and masters of a new civalisatoin . In the same way allot of people have this bizar respect for the romans and how gr8 they were , despite the fact that there gratness was most likely bult of the backs of slave labor murder and genoside.

a more recent example than romans would be How the british raped and exploited people around most the world and still remain respectable.
the germans were just noobs.


The whole genoside thing repatedly happens and we still dont seem to give a shit it would be nice if people were educated about genoside in general and how easily it happens.


Intresting genosides

Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)

Slobodan Milosevic (Yugoslavia, 1992-99)

Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)

Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)

colinisatoin of amerca ( admitedly allot of it was desize but the british and other people that moved to USA compelaty fucked up a whole load of people)


I dont know if u can class the reacent wars in iraq a genoside , or maby veatnam war. personaly im not so sure how much intentoin matters , in the sence that if u intend to wipe out a natoin of people or if thats just what happens. in the end if a whole load of people end up dying then from the perspective of that group of people its a genoside. the only difference would be if they died because they were activly in combat with the otherside running at them with guns , or if they were cavileans that were killed through a genetic / gealogical asoceatoin .





>> ^demon_ix:

If you had actually watched the video instead of just trolling, you would have seen that's exactly what they did. They set up factories in Poland to take advantage of the Coal resources in the area and used the prisoners as forced labor to build weapons for the German war effort.
>> ^westy:
~Its still fine to murder people or just forget its hapaaning , you just canot do it in camps .
if the nazies were clever they would have just exsploited 3rd world labor and only invaded countries that had pore militaries but strong resources.