Of course... It's mostly factual, in particular those scenes when they manage to "enhance" a suspect's image to perfection from a blurry photograph or low resolution security cam

>> ^Chaucer:

You do realize the show is fact right?
>> ^EMPIRE:
You know what I also "love" about CSI Miami?
the fact that the guys from the lab, who for all intents and purposes are public workers, have Humvee's as their official work cars. One of the least efficient motor vehicles ever made, and not exactly cheap. No wonder the US is about to default! lol

You do realize the show is fact right?

>> ^EMPIRE:

You know what I also "love" about CSI Miami?
the fact that the guys from the lab, who for all intents and purposes are public workers, have Humvee's as their official work cars. One of the least efficient motor vehicles ever made, and not exactly cheap. No wonder the US is about to default! lol

You know what I also "love" about CSI Miami?

the fact that the guys from the lab, who for all intents and purposes are public workers, have Humvee's as their official work cars. One of the least efficient motor vehicles ever made, and not exactly cheap. No wonder the US is about to default! lol

>> ^residue:

better zoom in and enhance the video to see the license plate


I blame Blade Runner for this.

better zoom in and enhance the video to see the license plate

..too bad no one noticed..

the SNIPER ON THE ROOFTOPS! "AAAHH NOOO! daadddyyyy."

*CSI Miami theme*





[at age three, I used to sit by the back door waiting for my father to return from work.. at 11pm (that's like 3 am, baby time)]

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I think this is really well put. I like the idea of a mutebox.

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

Clearly, we're all opinionated mofos and are going to butt heads.
So yeah, to slow VideoSift's inevitable slide into a niche version of youtube - comments and all - Civility is important.
Since Dag and Lucky probably have more important things to do than babysit, and VideoSift was founded on the principles of self-correcting stewardship or whatnot..
We should find a solution to maintain civility that satisfies both.
All that said, the two best method for returning civility to VideoSift have been suggested by @rottenseed & @lucky760:
      1. Anonymous "flag inappropriate" is a must.
[Tit for tat has been the name of the game on this site for a while, myself included. BoneRemake is just that infuriating sometimes, hah.]
      2. Muting malicious users for a few days is sensible.
[Ten flags by Gold Stars gets you 3 days in the mutebox? Maybe even a new badge to track frequency? Increasing mutebox timeouts of 3,7,11,15 days?]
      3. Crown Stars could be our own CSI!
[Crown users could browse the list of users in the Mutebox in order to help mediate.
We all trust our Crown star members to be honest and somewhat impartial investigators, right? ...right?]
      4. Receiving enough "inappropriate" flags or MuteBox Badge levels summons the heaviest of hitters - @dag & @lucky760
[This insures only the douchey-est of douches are singled out for bannination.
If you don't get the hint to be more civil after 30 or 40 members repeatedly tell you to cut it out, it's clear you didn't join the sift to be a productive part of our community.]
Anywho, that was my 1/5th of a dime.
Peace, bitches trolls and douche bags. = P

Clearly, we're all opinionated mofos and are going to butt heads.

So yeah, to slow VideoSift's inevitable slide into a niche version of youtube - comments and all - Civility is important.

Since Dag and Lucky probably have more important things to do than babysit, and VideoSift was founded on the principles of self-correcting stewardship or whatnot..

We should find a solution to maintain civility that satisfies both.

All that said, the two best method for returning civility to VideoSift have been suggested by @rottenseed & @lucky760:

      1. Anonymous "flag inappropriate" is a must.

[Tit for tat has been the name of the game on this site for a while, myself included. BoneRemake is just that infuriating sometimes, hah.]

      2. Muting malicious users for a few days is sensible.

[Ten flags by Gold Stars gets you 3 days in the mutebox? Maybe even a new badge to track frequency? Increasing mutebox timeouts of 3,7,11,15 days?]

      3. Crown Stars could be our own CSI!

[Crown users could browse the list of users in the Mutebox in order to help mediate.

We all trust our Crown star members to be honest and somewhat impartial investigators, right? ...right?]

      4. Receiving enough "inappropriate" flags or MuteBox Badge levels summons the heaviest of hitters - @dag & @lucky760

[This insures only the douchey-est of douches are singled out for bannination.

If you don't get the hint to be more civil after 30 or 40 members repeatedly tell you to cut it out, it's clear you didn't join the sift to be a productive part of our community.]

Anywho, that was my 1/5th of a dime.

Peace, bitches trolls and douche bags. = P

The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.

11 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.

The docu footage of the real Kuklinksi around both the Sift and the tube is far more fascinating and horrible, and still will be no matter how much they polish this turd.

Kuklinski loved his wife and kids, who never knew what he did for a living until he was arrested. He was a terrible SOB, but both his parents were horribly abusive.

The vic in this scene was an overconfident partner who threatened to harm Kuklinski's family. Big mistake. They were driving along when Kuklinski shot him, while driving.

The ice cream truck has two stories. Another hitman, a crazy Vietnam vet, drove one into neighborhoods to do hits, but also actually sold ice cream to kids.

Kuklinski never tortured but did hack up victim's bodies after they were dead. He liked using an ice cream truck's freezer to thwart "time of death" measurements from that era's version of "CSI".

After seeing this, it's possible Shannon could be a decent Zod.

Respectfully, your invocation was flawed. This invocation is one of the unforgiving ones. You committed the horrible error of capitalizing the "d."
In reply to this comment by GDGD:
Huh, I don't know why that didn't work.

I believe thats wrong.

In reply to this comment by Stingray:
I think when you do a dupeof command, there can't be anything else included in the comment box.
In reply to this comment by GDGD:
Huh, I don't know why that didn't work.

I think when you do a dupeof command, there can't be anything else included in the comment box.
In reply to this comment by GDGD:
Huh, I don't know why that didn't work.

*Dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Justin-Bieber-Shot-and-Killed

>> ^jonny:

This is slightly longer, but I'd say this is a dupe of http://videosift.com/video/Justin-Bieber-Shot-and-Killed


>> ^Stingray:

Can't call it, but:
dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Justin-Bieber-Shot-and-Killed