Response to earlier comment. Continued dialogue with humorous observation.

Hey Kyle, thought I'd drop a line to say hi, and I'm missing the good old days on the Sift when the two of us were the only conservative minds around here. If you come by here again drop me a line. Hoo-Rah brother!

http://www.videosift.com/video/Steve-Nash-is-just-like-you-Except-10x-better

Since you already know how much I love Steve Nash.

Well I'm getting there, not at the level of sift addiction I was at but this site is seriously in need of more rational conservative sense. Glad to see your still truckin' along too.

In reply to this comment by MarineGunrock:
Glad to see you back!

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
>> ^Farhad2000:
Reminds when the US impeached Clinton over getting a blow job. But didn't impeach Bush over illegally taking America to war.


Congress declares war, not presidents.

That was well worth my time. Thanks for thinking of sending me a note about it.

In reply to this comment by Doc_M:
http://www.videosift.com/video/An-Overview-of-America-by-the-John-Birsch-Society

http://www.videosift.com/video/MST3K-Samson-Vs-The-Vampire-Women

check it out bro. It's a good one.

And by good I mean atrocious.

A thousand thanks! I don't know why this has been so hard to sift.

In reply to this comment by schmawy:
Oh so *promoteable, my good man!

*ban

That's the problem, unless we get republicans back in congress, they are going to run Obama too. He voted with his party 93% of the time. I'll admit that McCain isn't much better since he mistakes stubbornness for principal. But Peloci pushed Obama around when he was a senator and I can see her doing the same if he's elected president.

I feel like I'm trying to choose the lesser of two evils this election season. But my biggest issue with Obama is his double talk, I have no idea what he's going to do because he talks out of both sides of his mouth. He needs to find his issues and stick to them.

In reply to this comment by bamdrew:
Confession; my car has one bumper sticker on it, and its Obama'08.

He's a smart man. There's a small possibility he could become a Nixon, but a much greater chance he'll work to get congress to bullshit around just a little less.

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
Thanks for the article, it was a good read. I really hope the American public can see how unstable he is before November.

In reply to this comment by bamdrew:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/opinion/20brooks.html?em&ex=1214107200&en=98dbf7f8bae1fe38&ei=5087%0A

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:


He advocates energy independence but pretends this can occur without more domestic drilling for oil and natural gas.

Of course maybe that's the defining mark of a true politician, being able to speak to one side while the other hears a different message.

Thanks for the article, it was a good read. I really hope the American public can see how unstable he is before November.

In reply to this comment by bamdrew:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/opinion/20brooks.html?em&ex=1214107200&en=98dbf7f8bae1fe38&ei=5087%0A

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:


He advocates energy independence but pretends this can occur without more domestic drilling for oil and natural gas.

Of course maybe that's the defining mark of a true politician, being able to speak to one side while the other hears a different message.

Thanks for the promote!

In reply to this comment by Fedquip:
*promote

Still a great song, needs more votes

Oh no totally it was the way popular thing to do. I hear it's all the rage. Popularity and whatnot.

In reply to this comment by doogle:
I guessed as much - the video was over a year old. It was a way to do a *.wtf invocation and assign channels in a conversation-like way, which I hear is all the rage now.

Beileve it or not VS at one time had no channels at all. But that was a long time ago.

In reply to this comment by doogle:
No channels - *wtf?
How *obscure this got on the sift without any channel assignment.

Must be that rogue helicopter pilot with his hand in the pie again. (I'm getting scared - but that's okay because it's my right.)

Thanks for the promote! I'm glad to see people appreciate music history.

In reply to this comment by youdiejoe:
brilliant! *promote

You are correct it is still in service. Although technically the A-10 was scheduled to be retired in 2002. But seeing as the US military still needed a low altitude air to ground vehicle they canceled the retirement and extended the service of the A-10 until 2028. If that holds true the A-10 will see a longer strech of military service then any other warplane in history. 52 years (1976-2028).

In reply to this comment by james_austintx:
"WAS"? It's still in use....

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
the A-10 was a freaking sweet piece of military equipment