Did Chris Wallace forget he's with FOX now? He's supposed to say things like "Republicans rock! Yer AWESOME!" He might get fired if Bill hears about this.

Wallace didn't ask for all the details. He just asked ballpark how much the 20% comes out to without reference to the loopholes. If Ryan can confidently say that with the loopholes closed it's revenue neutral, then he must be able to say the amounts on each side.

Also, if it's revenue neutral, that means on average, Romney/Ryan are promising precisely nothing except uncertainty about whether you'll go up or down.>> ^VoodooV:

did Paul Ryan just admit that torture doesn't work? That's gotta honk off the Republican establishment.
In Ryan's defense though. The budget is this insanely complicated thing. He's absolutely correct that you can't just give a few sound bites that adequately summarizes things up. We live in a complex world, you can't reduce lots of things into sound bites that will satisfy the armchair politicians

Your video, TYT - Chris Wallace Nails Paul Ryan to the Wall, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

It does feel like they are trying to distance themselves from Romney's stank, but they are also playing up Romney as an underdog victim of a liberal media. I've never known FOX to throw in the towel, so this must be part of some bigger strategy. October surprise?
>> ^Yogi:
Looks like Fox is preparing for when it has to say "Look these candidates sucked, we need better ones!"
Pretty interesting how this election is going to affect the Republican party going forward.



It seems to me that Fox would play the long game. They're not gonna put too many chips anywhere, they're here for keeps.

It does feel like they are trying to distance themselves from Romney's stank, but they are also playing up Romney as an underdog victim of a liberal media. I've never known FOX to throw in the towel, so this must be part of some bigger strategy. October surprise?
>> ^Yogi:

Looks like Fox is preparing for when it has to say "Look these candidates sucked, we need better ones!"
Pretty interesting how this election is going to affect the Republican party going forward.

It does feel like they are trying to distance themselves from Romney's stank, but they are also playing up Romney as an underdog victim of a liberal media. I've never known FOX to throw in the towel, so this must be part of some bigger strategy. October surprise?
In reply to this comment by Yogi:
Looks like Fox is preparing for when it has to say "Look these candidates sucked, we need better ones!"

Pretty interesting how this election is going to affect the Republican party going forward.




(5 years on this site and I still hit profile reply instead of quote on a regular basis. derp.)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'bill clinton, fox news, terrorism, 911' to 'bill clinton, fox news, terrorism, 911, chris wallace' - edited by Grimm

If only more consumer electronics had female names and could be bought from stores with dorky (apologies to any Wallace's out there) male names.

"Honey, I'm just popping down to Neville's to pick up the latest Samsung Agnes!"

One day travelling on the train to work.
"Wow, what's that you have there?"
"This is the latest tablet from HP, it's called the...Deidre, I got a great deal down at Nigel"

How cynical is this: CBS's YouTube tribute to Mike Wallace has an obnoxious 30-second ad you have to sit through first, and embedding is turned off. That's how they show their respect for their most famous journalist.

Stay classy CBS.

What Mike Wallace was to the 80s, is what Chris Hansen is to all the people who had a seat right over there...

Thank-You!
In reply to this comment by gwiz665:
Aw, I always liked Mike on 60 minutes.

*quality *doublepromote

I hate Chris Wallace--but he did good here.

You have been awarded 1 Power Point for fixing the embed code for Dead Pool video Erich Fromm interviewed by Mike Wallace. Thank you for helping maintain VideoSift's reliability.

Yeah, the Republican establishment doesn't want Ron Paul to win, and they don't even want him to be taken seriously. So it shouldn't come as a surprise that they won't give him the status of a serious candidate until it's absolutely undeniable that he is one. And that will take more than one early primary win. Chris Wallace is completely right about the the establishment will react. And he should know, he works for them.

He's a twisted guy, that one. Making comparisons between some old bigot (George Wallace) keeping black kids out of schools, and the Ted Kennedy's of the world forcing kids to stay in dysfunctional schools? What the hell kind of weird bullshit was that? He really has a hate on for teachers unions. Is it government employee unions they hate specifically?

Liberty means the rich not being forced to pay for things they don't like, like anything that helps the poor. That's just redistribution of wealth, AKA socialism. Let them eat McDonald's.

Oh, and I also can't believe I watched the whooooole thing.
(takes pepto-bismol)