"...there are some very quick stock footage clips towards the beginning that are very graphic..."

Can you provide a little more info there? I was about to click play and just read that. Now I don't know if I want to watch it or not!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

This is very newsworthy - but also very graphic and not something I think should be on the Sift. Happy to leave it here for discussion though.

>> ^alien_concept:

>> ^BoneRemake:
She gets to see how extreme he can be with his emotions.

And you can't blame him either. This part for me was all about him acting on instinct, he kisses her for the first time, the sense of protection he has for her overwhelms and consumes him and causes him to annihilate this threat to her. Fucking great scene!


That is exactly what I thought as well, but I watched it again and noticed how she was before the ride and how they looked at each other at the end. Just finishing it again for the many something time.

>> ^BoneRemake:

She gets to see how extreme he can be with his emotions.


And you can't blame him either. This part for me was all about him acting on instinct, he kisses her for the first time, the sense of protection he has for her overwhelms and consumes him and causes him to annihilate this threat to her. Fucking great scene!

>> ^gwiz665:
With a fitting warning, I think this could stay. Some of these people have been horribly maimed and possibly killed though, and I'd see this video as a warning against being stupid in nature, more than entertainment.


NSFW added, and title changed to include "The content amazing but I warn you--it is very graphic. Nature kills, maims and harms, whether animals or people. Some actually die in this video so beware.

Jigga, calm down please. I never called you a troll and in fact find, besides your angry outbursts, you are rational. I disagree with you on numerous points--not that your views have less merit than mine or more.

If you wanted an intersting title, you should have been prepared for some question marks about the slick practice of headling catching...

Second, I am actually with you on one thing Jigga--I think money should never come before public safety in Law Enforcement. And that means I never contradicted myself. If people are willing to pay, then yes, waiting would have been vastly the better option. You seem to think I hold the opposite view... On a side note, we agree even further. The war on drugs is not a good thing...

And lastly, a hockey team does not play in a line, one behind the other. The comparision is not worthy of you. Single file means the first person is by himself for as long as he acts solo... And in a time counted in gunshots, that is less than seconds.

>> ^JiggaJonson:
First of all, @<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since February 16th, 2006" href="http://dag.videosift.com"><STRONG style="COLOR: #008800">dag quotefail right above me again^ Neglect..NEGLECT!! (jk)
Second, @<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since May 3rd, 2010" href="http://videosift.com/member/Lawdeedaw">Lawdeedaw did I say it was a comedy? I said I, personally speaking, use humor to deal with things I find repulsive. Maybe the title isn't as serious as it should be as is, but my intent was never to have anyone rolling in the isles. I wanted something catchy so people might actually watch it before absent-mindedly dismissing it without a second glance. As I said in the previous post, I feel like there is plenty of warning before ANY footage is even shown, the word "murder" is in the tags, I said in the description "be warned, this video is very graphic," and it's labeled NSFW. Anyone who says they "accidentally" watched this is fucking lying.
You say "Are you willing to pay for/ and justify that expense in a down economy to your video sift neighbor?"
>>>>>In short, if it means not needlessly killing someone because no one is in any immediate danger, yes. And I think people who value tax dollars over human life have morals that are askew.
But, then you go on to admit that "they relied on their weapons. That is just plain dumb. Waiting till the suspect leaves does seem the best option."
And you have the balls to tell me that I'm contradicting myself? Do me a favor the next time you want to know what I think, just ask me since (and you can ask anyone in the "just sayin" conversation cringe ) I'm clearly a troll with assloads to say. That way you might get a slightly closer to the mark than you would inventing some hearsay nonsense.
Lastly, you mention the numerals involved. I don't agree that just because one cop pulled the trigger it was one cop vs one guy. The officers, even if they were ill coordinated, acted as a unit. I titled this without wanting to watch it again so I estimated the number of police. A re-watching had me count 7 cops walking through the door, 1 holding a camera, and 1 taking pictures with a flash in the background. By my count that's 9 officers ( acting in concert ) in total.
You wouldn't say that about a hockey goalie whose teammates were in the penalty box. The entire other hockey team would have one objective, to put the puck in the goal. Even if one person scored in some crazy twist of fate where all of the opposing team's hockey sticks didn't slap the puck in simultaneously, the announcer would probably say "________ team scored!!!" regardless of the fact that one person probably shot the goal.

First of all, @dag quotefail right above me again^ Neglect..NEGLECT!! (jk)

Second, @Lawdeedaw did I say it was a comedy? I said I, personally speaking, use humor to deal with things I find repulsive. Maybe the title isn't as serious as it should be as is, but my intent was never to have anyone rolling in the isles. I wanted something catchy so people might actually watch it before absent-mindedly dismissing it without a second glance. As I said in the previous post, I feel like there is plenty of warning before ANY footage is even shown, the word "murder" is in the tags, I said in the description "be warned, this video is very graphic," and it's labeled NSFW. Anyone who says they "accidentally" watched this is fucking lying.

You say "Are you willing to pay for/ and justify that expense in a down economy to your video sift neighbor?"
>>>>>In short, if it means not needlessly killing someone because no one is in any immediate danger, yes. And I think people who value tax dollars over human life have morals that are askew.

But, then you go on to admit that "they relied on their weapons. That is just plain dumb. Waiting till the suspect leaves does seem the best option."

And you have the balls to tell me that I'm contradicting myself? Do me a favor the next time you want to know what I think, just ask me since (and you can ask anyone in the "just sayin" conversation *cringe*) I'm clearly a troll with assloads to say. That way you might get a slightly closer to the mark than you would inventing some hearsay nonsense.

Lastly, you mention the numerals involved. I don't agree that just because one cop pulled the trigger it was one cop vs one guy. The officers, even if they were ill coordinated, acted as a unit. I titled this without wanting to watch it again so I estimated the number of police. A re-watching had me count 7 cops walking through the door, 1 holding a camera, and 1 taking pictures with a flash in the background. By my count that's 9 officers ( acting in concert ) in total.

You wouldn't say that about a hockey goalie whose teammates were in the penalty box. The entire other hockey team would have one objective, to put the puck in the goal. Even if one person scored in some crazy twist of fate where all of the opposing team's hockey sticks didn't slap the puck in simultaneously, the announcer would probably say "________ team scored!!!" regardless of the fact that one person probably shot the goal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Girl's_Guide_to_21st_Century_Sex


Also features a male to female sex change... that's very graphic. I damn near gagged, to be honest.

Shoot. I can't change the messed-up tags. Please fix this, MrFisk. This isn't a horror movie produced for entertainment, nor a commercially released production. This is footage of an actual premeditated and very public suicide. After careful thought, I agree w/ Tymbrwulf that this is clearly snuff and shouldn't be on the site.

edit: Thanks for fixing the tags.
Also, after reading the very graphic text of what happens in this video, I didn't even feel the need to watch it, if the description is completely accurate.

People are only upset about the seal hunt for two reasons.

1) they're cute
2) they're hunted on snow and ice so it looks very graphic

There's no danger to the species whatsoever, they're prolific, in fact if they were left unchecked they'd be endangering OTHER species.

I hate it when idiots who see a little graphic footage immediately jump to the conclusion that it's wrong without any real information.

For the moron commenting about rifles, the club used on seals is specially designed for a quick kill and is less likely to cause suffering than a rifle. Learn about what you're discussing before you speak instead of shooting your mouth off.

I managed a photo lab for a year once. You do need to look at every picture to tune the color/contrast. I once got a very graphic pic of a 7 yr old girl spread eagle on a couch sun dress no panties. I could have panicked, but looking at the other photos, (basic family function shots), it appeared the kids got a hold of the camera and were playing and this pic got accidentally taken. I kept quiet, showed the pic to the Dad when he came in and watched him turned white as a sheet.

That was the end of it. I broke the law and defied company policy but damn glad I did. Just mentioning this even to mall security could have destroyed a family.

Level heads peeps. No one can follow the letter of the law and have justice at the same time. It's like trying to follow the new testament as written.

Was about to call * nsfw because of the very graphic picture after the video ends titled "Murder by bus".

>> ^dag:
There is definitely a difference between this and porn - it's hard to pin down but I know it when I see it.
It has to do with exploitation, production for sexual gratification, the will of the person performing and artistic merit.
The Wii girl was closer to porn than this.


Exactly - Pornography is done purely for sexual pleasure, often very graphic and sexually explicit. Erotica on the otherhand, often protrays sexuality and human anatomy often to high art aspirations (such as this performance)
Human anatomy is not porn, and it shouldn't be "indescent"

I refer back to my sifttalk http://wtf.videosift.com/talk/Survey-Sex-and-Gay-Kissing-are-Worse-Than-Severed-Heads
about twisted sense of morals

I live in Ireland and have been listening to Sineads pronouncements for 20 years or more. She lives down the road from me and she is nuts. She takes out full page newspaper adds to appeal for privacy or announce her retirement (shortly before a tour or new album etc.) The latest is people are leaving poison cakes outside her house for her kids...

Its revisionist nonsense to say this was about one thing or another because at the time I only heard her refer to abortion and "patriarchy" when defending this. She was pissed at catholics because the Irish had voted against allowing abortion in Ireland (whom she described as "too childlike to understand what they were voting on"), this having a lot to do with religous opinion.

Dont forget that after all this she later became a catholic priest(!). Then she got tired of that and she became a rasta priest. This only scratches the surface with Sinead. She made lengthy (and very graphic) statements about her own sexual abuse at the hands of her mother in an irish paper. The sex abuse had profoundly religous characteristics and was quite horrific. Her brother happened to write for the same paper and this resulted in a public back and forth between them, with both he and her father insisting it was all lies.

You might not believe I'm a fan of Sineads, but I am. Shes very talented but she is on a different planet. I long ago learnt to listen to her music and ignore the rest.

Excellent post.. there are some really interesting movies at that site... I know, some of them are very graphic.. it's definitely not for children, so best to keep them off that site. Last night I watched a few of them.. I think everyone needs to watch "The United Nations deception" and "Who Killed the Electric Car?" - Both are amazing documentaries.

*quality