this should be the next big internet challenge: try to down a drink while listening to clips like these (w/o the slightest spit-take).

isn't it something, hearing the co-occurrence of mtg claim of never of having heard of the 4x polio vaccine, when the process is actually that? that's spooky dumb.

but that is a phenomenon have noticed over the years (just off the top o' head)...

- the orange scream admin's numerous typos (SOTU tickets, inaugural tickets...) selling it's self as the best ever
- blackburn quoting the declaration of independence while pontificating about the constitution, yet she is on the panel questioning a SCOTUS candidate
- w's sec of war not knowing the history of WWII when declaring adolph was elected
- the gop urging of obama to let an oil pipeline continue, yet the same co. having a major pipeline break, just days before the decision deadline

...the symmetry in their assertion of knowledge; then disproving the claim - many times in the same sentence - is surrealistic.

add this and their laws against schools...

https://youtu.be/YR5ApYxkU-U?t=204

Honestly, I'm pessimistic. I work with Virtual Reality for a living and I find head mount displays (even premiere research quality head mounts with top notch head/body tracking) to be a shitty experience. I'd rather nvidia glasses done well. My main complaint is with the very short optical distance between your eyes and the display.

Even with the latency thing, he kind of sets up and breaks down his own argument. He says, 2ms samples, so latency should be great! Then he says that they integrate over those samples to get an accurate measure... well... there goes your low latency.

America' Next Top Crack Head!

At least she's sorry [and well coiffed to boot] =oD

I have tested this on a single car in multiple locations on numerous occasions and have found that head contact, or indeed any skin or near skin contact (top of head, arm, body, etc) increases the range 20-50%. This does not seem to be affected by orientation of the remote, with the exception that a specific end of the remote must be near the body. Getting good line of sight is important, and blocking the remote with my hand or body seemed reduce the range considerably.

The reflector hypothesis is an interesting one, rich_magnet. The body being composed heavily of water would help to create an impedance mismatch which would reflect some frequencies. If so, I would think the chest area would be the largest, most effective reflector. In my experience, if the remote is more than a quarter-inch away from the body, it will not noticeably affect the range.

I'm upvoting, not for the posting of this video and the usual over the top, sensationalistic heading, but the discussion here including the backstory.

Again with the watching a tiny snippet of an event and judging purely based on that.

Complete bullshit.

hehe, I used Commentary mode to practise, it spawns a witch while a designer talks about her, and i just practised to see what worked, shotgun, top of head - dead.


And yeah, if you play Expert you have to know this, sometimes the witch can't be sneaked around and well...yeah

(off to play left for dead!)

Tags for this video have been changed from 'brick, balance, head, top of head, 20, bangladesh' to 'bricks, balance, head, top of head, bangladesh, labour, l33t 3rd world skillz' - edited by legacy0100

>> ^gorgonheap:
Congrats, may you have many children and your hair grow as the hydrilla weed.


My hair grows like well fertilized grass, everywhere except the top of head, where it used to.
The hydrilla weed is a curse to your plugs and props. Landing a fish thru it is a challenge, and when you do get it to the boat it looks like a swamp monster.

^

There is not top of head! How can cheese live there!?