search results matching tag: toadies

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (6)     Sift Talk (0)     Blogs (0)     Comments (36)   

Hear why Bob from PA regrets voting Trump in 2016

newtboy says...

Thanks Bobby, I needed a laugh.
Boss Trump. LMAHS! You mean in the vein of Boss Hogg? Sounds about right, obese moron constantly trying to steal public funds and abuse his office with the help of his sycophantic toadies. Is that what you meant?

Trump bluster aside, there's nothing else there. He's pure bluster encasing, narcissism, rudeness, classlessness, and most of all massive insecurity. Rodney Dangerfield should play him in the movie.

PS, don't look at ANY polls, they might burst that little bubble you pretend to live in.
Also ignore that there are now at least 3 large, well funded conservative/Republican groups putting out anti Trump commercials daily that all regret voting for Trump....not to mention he's lost the vote of every Bernie Bro who voted out of spite, every farmer, and those 8% of minorities that voted for him...even the military is unhappy because he took money from military family housing for his fence, so their children live with black mold so trump can stage a photo op.
Lol, Bobby. It's far more likely YOU are a fake. It's a certainty you are a Russian agent, the only questionable part is if you know it or not.

bobknight33 said:

Its a fake.

Trump bluster aside no one regrets voting for BOSS TRUMP.

Trump Gives Mitt Romney A Cool New Nickname

moonsammy says...

Had McCain lived, I'm guessing there would've been at least 3 votes to convict: Romney, McCain, and Graham (he was McCain's toady originally). They might've been able to drag Collins and/or Murkowski along, perhaps Alexander. Alas.

New Rule: The Good Sex Economy

drradon says...

ummm, you mean like Slick Willie???? serial groper supreme? who "never had sex with that woman" - no, definitely not equivalent... no way....

and a secretary of state who has a foundation that receives multi-million dollar donations from foreign governments (or their toadies) because they believe in the alleged purposes of that foundation.... no possible equivalency there....

only good thing about defending the indefensible is that there will always be job security....

newtboy said:

Yep, a comedian on a comedy tour taking a joke picture pretending to assault a sleeping woman who then quit of his own accord is exactly the same as a long term pedophile who enjoys his parties full support and never backs down or apologizes even after losing, or a philanderer who blackmail his mistress by taking naked pictures of her tied up and threatening to make them public then fights removal.

There is no equivalency. There's not a monopoly on one side, no, but there's absolutely not "every bit as much corruption and dishonesty on the Democrat side of politics as there is on the Republican". Republican dishonesty is about selling the country to Russia and raiding the treasury, and hiding or excusing inexcusable behavior and permeates everything they say. Democratic dishonesty is about which email account an email came from and pretending the leadership has no bias, and bowing to hyper sensitivity and disingenuous faux outrage.

For example...
Asked how his tax plan benefits the rich, he replied....
Trump: "No, I don't benefit. I don't benefit. In fact, very very strongly, as you see, I think there's very little benefit for people of wealth."

When asked about his rich friends....
"They can call me all they want; not going to help," he said Sept. 27, 2017. "I'm doing the right thing and it's not good for me, believe me."

When asked about the Trump zero tolerance plan to tear families apart as a political ploy, Trump claimed the Democrats did it and only they can reverse it, then he reversed his plan himself proving both family destroying lies to be lies.

The consistency, levels, and importance of the dishonesty from Republicans is exponentially greater than that from Democrats, who are far from perfect themselves.

Edit: Btw, Mahr has addressed the issue of him running for office repeatedly, he's capable and intelligent enough to be honest and say he's a horrible politician and would probably never run, and he knows he's far more influential exactly where he is than he might be as a freshman representative.....and he's smart enough to see that a candidate that gets out the vote for the opposition (like Clinton) is a horrendously stupid idea.
And Franken worked out great until he caved to false outrage and quit while pedophiles and abusive philanderers were welcomed into the opposing party feigning the outrage over a funny (but disrespectful) picture.

USA and russian relations at a "most dangerous moment"

Bill Maher - Ann Coulter: In Trump We Trust

MilkmanDan says...

Always enlightening (if rather unpleasant) to hear what some of the extreme voices like Coulter are saying. And to be fair, she was somewhat more coherent than usual.

But I thought Maher did an excellent job of asking very legitimate, logical questions and then giving her enough leash with her responses to get herself into trouble.

If you hate Trump, watch this video. And other videos from his supporters and toadies. And read the Drudge Report on occasion. Because as Sun Tzu said:

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Reality Show President: Inside the White House PR Machine

The Tug Toner

Fletch says...

Powers... that's what it's all about for many of you cliquies and badge toadies. Oh, and please, please, feel free to fuck off and die. I know I'm far from the only one who is tired of your bullshit comments, and certainly the absolute LAST person who gives a flying fuck about motherfucking star powers. If you can't take a fucking joke, go soak your head in something really, really cold until the swelling goes down.

BoneRemake said:

Good thing you dont actually have any powers as you clearly do not understand simple things such as what constitutes a dupe.

QI - Blowing Smoke Up One's Ass

kymbos says...

Yeah, I did a little google search too. None of the definitions do justice to how I understand the phrase, which is to toady up to someone with undue praise.

A: You really are the only musician here with any real genius.
B: Stop blowing smoke up my arse.

The mystery continues...

Stewart Nails GOP For Flip Flopping On Escrow Fund

Winstonfield_Pennypacker says...

Why are BP and the President handling something that is clearly the courts responsibility?

This. Whatever liability BP is on the hook for should be handled 100% through the courts, not by the Executive branch. There is a separation of powers for a reason.

it just means there's a government-run escrow being set up to ensure that BP has set aside the funds to pay claims

You say the words GOVERNMENT RUN ESCROW and still no alarm bells go off in your head? The executive branch does not have the power to do this. The Constitution plainly states you appeal to congress for a redress of grievances – not the President’s personally appointed toadies. Now Obama’s ‘pay czar’ is the one people bow & scrape before for redress – a guy who has no oversight, answers to no one, didn’t have a single vote by Congress, and doesn’t have to face an approval process. No chance for abuse there, eh?

but no real sign that any of those people want to deprive Obama of the power to detain terror suspects indefinitely without trial

The president has no constitutional right to collect monies from private organizations of any kind for any reason - real or fancied, freely or begrudged. The president DOES have a constitutional right direct the military and defense of this country and that includes treatment of captured enemy soldiers. See the difference?

Just as a final note – I’m not saying BP should be ‘off the hook’. I’m of the opinion that when anyone screws up, they should take responsibility for their actions. When a company screws up, they should pay for the damages. BP has been cutting corners & playing dangerously to save cash and the mess is their fault. They should do the right thing and step up & fix it. That includes paying for legitimate damages and cleanup.

That’s not the same thing as saying they should just write a black check and hand it to the government and walk away. There is certainly no onus on BP to pay all the lunatic claims that will inevitably result as the greedy vultures start circling over this 20 billion. BP isn't responsible for lower tourism revenues, or dropping home prices. The only people that should be getting money are people who have actual PHYSICAL repairs or clean up costs due to oil. All the other stuff is 'act of god' stuff and sometimes that just happens and you have to deal with it.

Obama’s ‘BP stash’ is designed by nature to be an irresponsible, unanswerable, politically motivated vote-machine. Why should we believe Obama is going to run this clean when he hasn’t run a single ‘clean’ political effort in his lifetime? At what point has government EVER been a responsible entity for the distribution of cash for damages? Never. This is the tobacco settlement fiasco just waiting to happen again.

spoco2 (Member Profile)

dystopianfuturetoday says...

>> ^dannym3141:
Thank you very much for your support against the attack from dystopian. He has done this before on the issue of racism.
He's made a second comment which was a massive attempt at an insulting psycho-analysis to try and a) insult and antagonise me and b) discredit me to others as a racist.
I absolutely will not stoop to doing that to him, nor giving him a fake psycho analysis to try and illustrate his deep rooted character faults.
It really upsets me that there are people on the sift that would do that kind of thing. Disagreeing with me is fine, but trying to publically analyse me and give a heavily biased insulting rundown is really .. well, i have no words for it, i'm simply hurt.
Seeing that someone understood and can see what dyst was trying to do makes me feel a WHOLE lot better


LOL. Hey, not fair, I want a toady too.

Also... http://www.videosift.com/video/67-year-old-white-dude-told-him-not-to-fuck-with-him?loadcomm=1#comment-947099

Toadies - Tyler

Anyone else having an issue visiting VideoSift for Vampires? (Fail Talk Post)

Jesse Ventura body slams Sean Hannity

<><> (Blog Entry by blankfist)

dystopianfuturetoday says...

The dumbfuck, soulless, racist, sack of shit cop in question is named Robert Powell.

If Robert Powell sees traffic tickets as more important than a man being with his mother during the last few minutes of her life, then he doesn't deserve to wear a badge. Law enforcement without humanity and respect for human life is dangerous. If this incident had not happened to a celebrity, it would have been completely swept under the rug, and this asshole, Robert Powell, would still be on the loose.

Fuck you, Robert Powell.

(OH, and MG, why are you always such a toady for law enforcement? Is a bare modicum of intelligence, wisdom and good judgment too much to ask from our armed protectors?)

Stimulus Smackdown

marinara says...

Very good sift. Thank you so much netrunner. I think i labeled you idealistic in the past, but a sifter of this doesn't deserve such a label. Sorry.

This fine debate between 2 men, clears up so much of the air, It casts a shadow on other "real" debates. In this debate, nobody is trying to patronize the audience. Nobody is trying to toady to the corporate media. Noone is going to suckle at the Federal reserve. In this debate, the debaters had character.

I hope this video has a very real effect in the dialogue here in the usa. I agree with the italian guy, we have to stop pretending that we are solving the problem. The real problem lies somewhere else.

bravo.

*promote.



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon