true enough! cheers

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
In cases such as this, where the dupe's owner is privileged, I don't worry about it. In fact, I find the discard gets the dupeof done quicker, as the owner will be notified that their video has been discarded and can then invoke dupeof themselves. When the owner is a mere subhuman such as I am, I usually call for help from one of the grownups.

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
ah, right right.. best to wait for a privileged member to come along and declare the dupeof before discarding then.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I'm 31 star points short of that privilege, yet, else I would.

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
for future reference - put a * in front of that dupeof so the original gets all the votes. i think it can still be done.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Leon-can-count
*discard

In cases such as this, where the dupe's owner is privileged, I don't worry about it. In fact, I find the discard gets the dupeof done quicker, as the owner will be notified that their video has been discarded and can then invoke dupeof themselves. When the owner is a mere subhuman such as I am, I usually call for help from one of the grownups.

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
ah, right right.. best to wait for a privileged member to come along and declare the dupeof before discarding then.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
I'm 31 star points short of that privilege, yet, else I would.

In reply to this comment by EndAll:
for future reference - put a * in front of that dupeof so the original gets all the votes. i think it can still be done.

In reply to this comment by xxovercastxx:
dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Leon-can-count
*discard

You wouldn't be upvoting Hasselbeck as if she were a great person. You would be upvoting how *terrible she is, the *terrible shirt, and the *failed bodyslam, which is also *terrible. I don't agree with what she is saying hence the channel assignments. Maybe adding "cunt", "stupid bitch", "wanker", "subhuman" or "disposably unremarkable" to the tags would make it more explicit.

>> ^dirtythirtyix:
I can't upvote this dumb twat.
"I don't like your criticism of one of my heroes, so I'm going to pull an unrelated talking point out of an elephant's ass, from a zoo, 600 miles away."

Most likely that person in black with the headset piece was a Scientologist.

They've been known to illegally pose as security or police to get things done and to suppress critics and protesters of scientology. The thing is, Scientology believes they're superior to us normal "wogs" as they call us. So its common that you and everyone there were treated like subhumans by, possibly not even museum security, but by scientologists posing as museum security. I'd get in contact with the museum as fast as possible about this. If the Museum doesn't do anything, go to the media because what happened here was definitely illegal.

The reason Mr. Cruise is here is because him and Katie Holmes are visiting the memorial day celebration at the mall while their scientology buddies will be there to exploit the celebration in order to get people to join scientology.

protip: Scientology does not care about about our veterans, only exploiting events and laws to gain more members and suppress the free speech of their critics.

Waterboarding seems more humane than homicide bombings, honor killings, cutting the heads off journalists and flying planes into buildings.

These disgusting subhuman terrorists deserve zero protection from any court of law, certainly not the ones in countries they seek to destroy.

Let any enemy nation declare these subhumans as their own soldiers. Then they'll finally be worthy of Geneva Conventions protection while their country of origin is erased from the earth.

what rights do gay people need, that humans don't already have? thats the problem i have with this: don't frame it as a gay rights issue because its not about gay rights its about human rights. frame it that way and suddenly you have drawn an imaginary line between two groups: "gays" and "non-gays" -- and division creates conflict.

gays have the right to marry/have gay sex/do gay things/give gay blowjobs because they are humans, not because they are gay.

frame it in a different context and suddenly a "gay basher" has a whole lot more in common with a gay person. frame it as a human rights issue, and the only way to take away a gay person's rights is to argue that gays are "subhuman" or "nonhuman" ...thats a lot more difficult than arguing that "homosexuality is wrong".

ask not of a gay basher, "should you bash gays?" ask him, "should you bash humans?"

Personally, I see no difference between the militants that the Israelis claim to be trying to snuff out, and the Israelis. They are both using violence to beget more violence. And I do have to agree that what the Israelis are doing is VERY much like the Nazis in many, many ways. Propaganda, censorship, senseless killing for political and material gain...In fact, while on that subject, the land that they occupy was taken from the Palestinians without any regard for how they might feel about it. Are we surprised that they aren't happy? If anyone should be pissed off enough to become violent, I don't think it is the Israelis. They've made out literally like bandits. They were given land that didn't belong to them, proceeded to procure more land that didn't belong to them when those who originally owned said land fought back and, to boot, they treat the original inhabitants as if they are subhuman.

They act without humanity, humility, or regard for anyone else or anything else. They don't even respect any of the countries without who's support they'd be wiped off the face of the map. I am still reeling from shock that they had the audacity to bomb three UN sites in Gaza. And are they gonna actually see any charges for war crimes for the use of illegal weapons? I doubt it with the way the world treats them like overindulged children. What they really need is a good smack on the rear to teach them their place in this world, and perhaps a little respect for other human beings.

Personally I am sick to be American when I think about how much money we give them to maintain their unscrupulous military! I say we pull their funding for a while and see how humble that makes them...that is if they aren't obliterated without us funding their military.

>> ^quantumushroom:
These are the last people anyone in the West anyone should care about; one rung lower than convicted murderers.


So you're saying they're subhuman? Hmm, where have I heard that before...

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
You don't need to dehumanize Muslim suicide bombers, only animals do that kinda stuff and you don't need to justify killing them, they kinda kill themselves and others, with again, the whole suicide bomb thing. Someone may now feverishly claim I think all Muslims are terrorists....c'mon younglings...


Wait.. I thought Hamas was using rockets and mortars and occasionally putting children into UN schools to be bomb targets human shields.

I didn't realize this whole thing was about animals and subhuman scum, which clearly all the people in Gaza must be. Oh, wait, you didn't say all of them, just the ones who die, who deserved to die anyways.

Subhuman gacy doesn't deserve to be remembered, not even in a horror flick.

Everyone was wrong on all sides really.
* Japan did horrible, HORRIBLE things during the war, despicable things to prisoners of war, treating humans as subhuman etc.
* The US did this.

But, the US really did think there was no way out, they thought that Japan would just keep going without abatement unless they did something pretty huge to demonstrate their power, and all they knew to do was use their atomic weapons.

Did it result in less deaths overall? Maybe, maybe not. It did seem to end the war pretty quickly though.

The irony here is that it was probably religion that ravaged his soul and left him an emotionally crippled subhuman.

Fox News is racist, bigoted, and hateful? And its employees act subhuman on air? Start the presses! Alert the internet!

So, someone can get suspended for saying the Clintons are pimping out Chelsea for her campaign, but these people aren't canned immediately? That's FAIR AND BALANCED!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

WRT the cunt label - seriously, an insult to cunts everywhere. Call me PC but I think the association of female genitalia with such a subhuman does no service to us.

Might be better to call her a pile of rotten shit. Because see, excrement - while it comes from us - is not part of us.

You're applying the situation only to Imran Khan and his ilk but think of your own arguments when it comes to issues of racism? Let's say tomorrow the KKK rallies in Washington DC for a cross burning would you defend their right to express their hate against another race? Because in your lines of arguement they would be just and so would the Nazi with their hatred of the Jews.

The popular rise of extremist muslims is not only due to propaganda but to the rise of military and political intervention in the West. When you have tanks rolling down your streets it's easy to be inflamed towards hate of the west, they are directly affected by it. How you would rationalize that activity just by saying "Oh they are all subhuman and their hate is misplaced" is ridiculous. The military and political intervention in the middle east is what exactly the global disaster, depriving human beings like you of valuable resources and imposing on your way of life by allowing radicalized hate to gain foothold because they create the right enviroment for that hate to rise.

Historically this is exactly how a mad man was allowed to rise in Germany. When another power imposes on the political and economic way of life. After the disastrous Treaty of Versailles. In Iran that is how a popular elected was deposed by the CIA, leading to the Islamic revoluition and radicalization of hate against the US. The US then supported extremist Saddam Hussein in a prolonged war against Iran. Is it so hard to see why people are mad at the West? At the UK involved in all of this? There is no escape we pay for the sins of our fathers. It's time we acknowledge that in our national policy decisions allowing us to make realistic decisions beyond the abuse of power. Where have the tenants of the cold war intelligence gone in favor of naked aggression?

You are simplifying this geopolitical issue to black and white in a real world of grey.