There is a slideshow with a few more photos here:

http://www.wect.com/story/19596250/demolition-crews-take-down-2000-ft-tv-tower

I usually hate youtube slideshows but that was good.

This is just spam. What it's selling, I'm not sure...

But at any rate, I expect VS to have higher quality than some Powerpoint slideshow.

I has opinions.

A music video should not be replaced with a live performance, IMO.

A live performance should not be replaced with a music video, IMO.

A specific live performance should not be replaced with a different live performance, IMO.

An audiosift with arbitrary background visuals (artist slideshow, static image, vintage footage, ironic footage, any other kind of 'filler' footage) should be able to be replaced with embeds that have different arbitrary background visuals. A short film set to a popular song would not be considered arbitrary background visuals, IMO.

It looks like you replaced a music video with a live performance, which is a no-no IMO.

This particular music video features Mike Patton in a Mr. Bungle shirt, which makes me happy. I like to be happy. Please make me happy.

I usually dislike slideshows, especially on youtube, but this one gets my vote.

so, he dropped a black head and a mollusk found it and startred licking it? and the doctor took pictures of a mollusk licking a black head and included it in his slideshow? Well done, good sir!

Personally I would prefer a water fountain like in the slideshow above. Most of them barely dribble out of the faucet.

Also, I'm pretty sure that's how they're supposed to work. The drain is for water dripping off your mouth.

No, that's not slow motion, that's a slideshow.

>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^bareboards2:
Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?
I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.


Generally people say " WHAT IS THIS AUDIOSIFT ? " But I think you are spot on. This definitely belongs in Soundsift.

Well, then, he doesn't have to click on it.

The channel is clearly noted. Some of us like these audio dealies, some don't.

Ain't nobody here King of Nuthin'. We all have our own ideas, right?

Operative words in your kind explanation are "it used to be." Right?

Thanks for the explanation. I was befuzzled.


>> ^xxovercastxx:

>> ^bareboards2:
Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?
I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.

>> ^bareboards2:

Why isn't this audiosift? Seems to meet the guidelines to me. What am I not understanding? @BoneRemake, as the keeper of the channel, is this audiosift?

I think what doogle was trying to say is this website is not audiosift. It used to be the general consensus, I think, that things which were not videos (eg: audio only or slideshows) do not belong on videosift.

http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/slideshow/dolphin-tattoo-stump-7860662#.TtsjPHAT_5M.facebook

Thot you might enjoy.

For a second I thought there would be a slideshow of awards, but that's a different Powerpoint.

Maybe there should be a short description to accompany the channel name on http://videosift.com/channels? Some of the channels are obvious while there are others I needed to look deeper. I agree with your point and would like to see a channel (maybe there is one already) for videos that are simply a slideshow of static images.

>> ^marinara:
huh! purple prose. I learn something every day.
saying that republicans want to destroy the USA. rash and hysterical. don't need any crazy in political discussions.
why didn't he say they just don't care,
http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/07/13/great_recession_elitism_slideshow/slideshow.html?slide=1
they 'know' that whatever happens, they'll still be millionaires or better.
That's a sober statement, and close to a fact.


Meh. Wanting to destroy and destroying are close to the same thing--and exactly the same outcome. Also, motives that are shady make it even closer.

That aside, it should be called, "Rapeanomics."

Just saying--because we need more hyperbole