My wife recently had an interesting vaccination related conversation with someone we know. This lady was incredulous that my wife had our 11 yr old daughter get the HPV (human papillomavirus) vaccine. Now this lady is very religious (most of you probably saw that one coming) and her argument is that it promotes sexual promiscuity. When my wife told me this all I could do is shake my head in disbelief. Apparently this is a widely held view in our area because when my wife told the nurse that she wanted our daughter to get the vaccine her eyes lit up and she said "Oh thank goodness! The huge majority of mothers who come in here won't even discuss it". My wife tried to explain to her that even if her daughter had no sexual activity until she was married, that would MAKE NO DIFFERENCE on what her future husband had done before getting married. Her hypothetical future husband could have all sorts of good stuff flying around in his body, and then her daughter is going to catch every thing he has because her mother was too fucking clueless to get her daughter vaccinated.

See? Atheists are inherently promiscuous.

Disclaimer: not all wireless cards have chipsets which support promiscuous/monitoring mode. Also, if you are not too linux-savvy and don't know how to use backtrack (lol i don't), you may also download an aircrack-ng image that will run in vmware. The VM contains a small linux distro with scripts that automate the process described in this video.

do guys really have this problem?
wanting to fuck women who are equally horny,yet desire for a partner that is a passive,meek door mouse for a relationship?
and then get confused to why there seems to be a sexual schizophrenia in their life?
it is not that complicated.
if you do not desire your girlfriend in the beginning,yet stick around because she has great "susie-home-maker" qualities,you might as well prepare for the divorce now.
the same goes for the opposite.
having fantastic sex with a woman only to find she is an idiot who looks banging in a t-back.
look,
i am not telling anyone how to run their business but for you guys out there consider this:
as men we are visual.
give us something to look at and some friction and we be happy lil dudes.
women are wired totally different.
while they can be visual,they are not as single-minded as men.(we have all seen the ugly dude with the hottie and thought wha???).
for women the two strongest components are sensual (touch) and emotional.
the emotional is the biggest key for a woman.this component decides how far she will surrender to you.
i use the word surrender specifically for a purpose.
because at it's core that's what it is.
as men we do not think of sex as "opening up" but that is EXACTLY how a woman views it.if i have to explain that further you need help.
a woman surrenders to you,she allows you access.
she is the gatekeeper..(sorry..gozer reference.i'll stop).

now do not confuse a hook up with the sex a woman craves.
women get just as horny as men but in our culture it tends to be frowned upon.so they use excuses like being drunk or whatever to ease their conscience.a hook up is a woman using YOU for something she needs,something we all need.
touching,kissing,caressing and yes..orgasms!
and you thought it was due to your irresistable charm..you go right ahead and keep telling yourself that.
unless the woman is mentally deficient she just needed sex.
*hint* if you can keep your trap shut and not brag to your buddies 5 seconds after she leaves your room she will come back...and often.
BUT..this arrangement will never be long lasting because at it's heart it only serves the purpose of the body and a woman needs to have the heart nourished also.
this is where i do not understand the question put to mr savage:
when a woman feels safe and secure in not her emotions but YOURS,this is when she will surrender to you.
she will open up and give you everything.
so even miss meek quiet doormouse will reveal a sexual experience to you that you thought not possible.
ALL women have this in them.
she will reveal a side of her that NOBODY else,including YOU,knew existed.
be prepared for the ride of your life.not only will be the best sex you ever had with her but from anybody!
so yes..even missus susie home maker can be a porn star if she trusts you enough.
*note* by the way.you might as well get prepared because you my friend are getting married.

so the only thing i can surmise from this question is:
1.the questioner is young,most likely early 20's
2.he watches waaaay too much MTV and thinks thats how a young man is supposed to act.what up dawg?!?
3.does not realize that women pay attention to EVERYTHING.
4.so while he may be attractive and fun,they consider him a DAWG and will only let him in so far.being very aware of his promiscuous nature.
5.predominantly the women he experiences are other predators with breasts(girls can be just as DAWG as dudes,dont kid yourself),while the girls with things like:self-esteem,strong personality and a strong sense of self avoid him like the plague.
6.the quiet meek women this man has encountered are also buying into a lot of the media,socialized Bullshit and see him as a notch into a particular crowd.future stalkers of america!
7.has never been with a real woman because a real woman would only play with him like a cat does a mouse.
8.i could totally be off my rocker and just spouting nonsensical bullshit.
9.while that may be true...woman utterly fascinate me.

what was the question again?

That town must have had a rather promiscuous, blonde, blue-eyed milkman, it seems.

As much as a mystery NatGeo seems to want to make out of this, there might just be a more plausible scientific explanation:

"Even though we could not find a definitive explanation for this higher incidence, the existence of other 'twin towns' around the world – most of them in remote isolated areas with high levels of inbreeding just as Linha São Pedro – shows that external influence is not needed for this to happen," [a scientist] says.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16492-nazi-angel-of-death-not-responsible-for-town-of-twins.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&nsref=online-news

But as they explicitly state, however, it's not a definitive explanation.

Interesting sift.

I've had a similar experience. In my previous job my boss occasionally brought his dog over to the office. After it happened a few times I asked to talk to him privately and explained that I, personally, perceive dogs as sexual objects, I consider their presence in the workplace promiscuous and offending as I'm often tempted to engage in sexual intercourse with them in the supply closet. Imagine my surprise when he laughed at me. I wasn't fired but decided to quit in favor of my current position as a vet's assistant.

Raverman, that's garbage and that's a good part of why they've gotten away with the level of militarization and control that they have.

More promiscuous? Ever heard of the 60s? Hell, penny arcades showed porn almost as soon as film was developed, turn of last century or so, search vintage porn and you might find more than you expect. Great Grandpa probably liked his porn too.

More violent? Bullshit. Crime rates have fallen and fallen again since the 60s and 70s and the biggest part of why they were as high as they were then is simple demographics. Young people are more likely to test the limits than older ones and the baby boom generation was just hitting their prime. Combine the age with the boldness large numbers of them would offer and you've got yourself some statistics. And statistics that fell on their own as those youth grew up and invested in the system rather than in rebellion. Crime rates in most areas that matter are just a fraction today of what they used to be, but the news coverage is better so we HEAR about more of it.

We don't have neighbors and community largely because of us. We don't give a damned anymore. We've become so used to having our thoughts and opinions spoon fed to us by the press or politicians that we've forgot how to read a paper or do research, come to a decision on our own.

There's a documentary here on the sift you might want to watch. It's called "The Century of the Self" and it examines how psychology first started to be used to manipulate people into buying products through advertising then when the politicians realized how useful it could be they started to use it as well. Over the last 100 years we've progressively been made more and more unthinking and dependent and we've got nobody to blame for it but ourselves, because we allowed it. It was just easier to let someone else do the thinking. If you want to know where we are today and why this is a decent start.

http://www.videosift.com/video/The-Century-of-the-Self-full-four-part-documentary

I can never get past the constant cycle where our culture hungers for media that constantly encourages a world where there is more violence, crime, sex, promiscuity around us.

We used to have a community and neighbors, now we don't walk at night because we don't know who's a criminal. Is it really like that? or do we just believe that because of what we see on Cops, America's Most Wanted, CSI, NCIS, etc etc etc.

Then the police use that portrait of a dangerous and violent world as a reason to get bigger weapons and armor. They are now starting to use drones to watch us 24/7 - to keep us safer.

But that only makes sense if everyone around is us a criminal and dangerous. Otherwise we're allowing ourselves to be guarded against a fantasy.

Profanity happens. Innuendo happens.

Why once I even called blankfist a pigfucker.

Jesus didn't strike me dead for it, so obviously it was okay with him.

Jigga, why are you more of a tightass than Jesus?

Maybe this would make sense if you were putting forth the argument that it's demeaning to gays, since the premise of the insult is that there's something wrong with QM's promiscuous cocksucking habits.

Personally, I don't see any problem with QM sucking any consenting dicks he can get his mouth around. It's his life, and I don't think we're in any position to judge him so long as he's not hurting anyone (if he's clumsy with his teeth though, that changes things entirely).

Let it go.

PS: Don't be too down on schoolyard insults, they're often far more effective than eloquent soliloquies for getting your point across in informal settings.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Virile, Promiscuous, Potent, Father of the year' to 'Virile, Promiscuous, Potent, Father of the year, 21 kids' - edited by EndAll

>> ^gwiz665:
A promiscuous friend of mine went to the doctor and found out she had mites, presumably from having sex with a dude that had sex with a corpse. Good times.


I first heard that urban legend about 10 years ago.

A promiscuous friend of mine went to the doctor and found out she had mites, presumably from having sex with a dude that had sex with a corpse. Good times.

Excellent analysis!

Adam and Eve really tell the story of a creature gaining awareness and sentience. It is the answer to - why are we not like the animals?

It says: We were. We were innocent, naked, not knowing morality, the law of the jungle. We miss that innocence - it was paradise. We were in harmony with nature. We gained knowledge (ate the fruit) other animals did not.

But why do we wear clothes? Well the real reason is that we get jealous an competitive about our mates. We need clothes and a sense of morals to avoid the conflict of being naked and stimulated by anyone else's mate.

The whole good / evil / serpent / die if you don't obey me. Well that reinforces the personal power of the religious leader so it's a nice fit in the story. But Eve deceived Adam right? Women are bad? Well that reinforces the prejudice of the religious leader telling the story. Also in a primative society. If your Mate is promiscuous - it's much easier to blame the weaker female to avoid conflict rather than have to fight with the male.

I assure you my tsking was directed at my own promiscuity, not your hermity ways

In reply to this comment by vinovin:
yeah...i don't get around much.

In reply to this comment by calvados:
Gosh, half the comments here are me whoring out some video of mine. Speaking of....

http://www.videosift.com/video/Jenn-Grant-Dreamer

It's anti-semitism. Read the final notation by pausing at 2:50.

The Jews are behind NWO, and are trying to implement the 7 Noahide Laws?

For reference, those are:

1. Prohibition of Idolatry: You shall not have any idols before God.
2. Prohibition of Murder: You shall not murder. (Genesis 9:6)
3. Prohibition of Theft: You shall not steal.
4. Prohibition of Sexual Promiscuity: You shall not commit adultery.
5. Prohibition of Blasphemy: You shall not blaspheme God's name.
6. Dietary Law: Do not eat flesh taken from an animal while it is still alive. (Genesis 9:4)
7. Requirement to have just Laws: You shall set up an effective judiciary to enforce the preceding six laws fairly.


You mean I can't eat the flesh of a living animal? That fucks up my whole weekend.

I suppose a whackjob could believe that it also means decapitation for worshiping Jesus, Allah, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but that's gonna be a tall order.

Sounds like something the fuhrer would've done -- or was that just giving a speech in an outdoors stadium? I forget.