>> ^brycewi19:

Hey, did anyone catch that Cruise sounds kinda like a chipmunk?


I've heard that...I also like his shorts.

Hey, did anyone catch that Cruise sounds kinda like a chipmunk?

Cruise sounds like a chipmunk.

FUCK YOU YA FUCKIN ASS! Your mom wore a chipmunk suit and licked railway ties for soup money.
In reply to this comment by siftbot:
Post cannot be self promoted by original submitter BoneRemake because BoneRemake does not have enough Power Points. (You can always purchase more Power Points.)

cruise sounds like a chipmunk.

You are correct. >> ^visionep:

My Sharona was on Chipmunk Punk so it must be punk, right?

My Sharona was on Chipmunk Punk so it must be punk, right?

Sounds like someone's been watching porn at 1.5x speed.

either that, or it's chipmunk porn.

Maybe a chipmunk?

@shinyburry
so did god and jesus also reveal themselves to the chipmunks, the beavers, the ostriches, the gnats, the millions of species all over this planet?
did god appear to the fish in fish form? or to the lemurs in lemur form?
or are humans just so special? are we just SO wonderful that a supreme being would construct a planet for us to enjoy?

you do of course realize just how incredibly self-serving that sounds?


dude, i have no doubt you mean well, but seriously man, chill. thinking you have all the answers is arrogant, not humble. a lot of people have had some seriously spiritual experiences, including myself. but i'll be damned if i'm going to be stupid and arrogant enough to slap a name and face on it and proclaim my ascension.

Do Not answer that, he is trapping you like chipmunks in a swinging feed patch.

Dag rocking the King beard. I like it.

I pledge my sword to thee, if it pleases m'lord, dag of the House VideoSift, the First of his Name, King of the dramatic chipmunks and the Shimabukuros, Lord of the Seven Kingdoms and Protector of the Realm

http://videosift.com/video/Dramatic-Chipmunk-meets-Orson-Welles

I have been on the books for a year and a half. I have been around here lurking for almost five years for hundreds of hours.

Precedent such as it may be called respective to significant content is acknowledged by me repeatedly in what I have commented. The overall scope of the precedent of nebulous variance to which you and others here, however long here, amounts to little other than wishful thinking and is not shared by all represented in your poll or not.

While I have and have had respect for much you have said here and elsewhere, I care not for your tone or its inferences that time here has conferred upon you some superior ability or powers of disernation exclusive to time onsite.

Polls here and elsewhere can be and sometimes are useful. As has been noted here and elsewhere as well, they can be and often are little more than circle jerks. Thus, popular and satisfying to those participating but less so to repugnant to those observing.


>> ^blankfist:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/chicchorea" title="member since October 15th, 2009" class="profilelink">chicchorea, precedent has been set. It has been for a while. Believe me, this isn't the first time the "dupe" conversation has reared its ugly head on here. You've only been here for over a year, but for some of the other members who've been on here for much longer, they know better.
The general consensus is that if a video shows enough of a variance from the original then it's not a dupe. For instance, if you sifted the dramatic chipmunk but with the audio changed to lounge music, it would NOT be considered a dupe even though the length is identical to the original dramatic chipmunk video. The same goes when sifting a shorter clip of a longer source. If there's enough of a change or if the change adds something different, then it's not a dupe.
Regardless, the poll will be our official 'go to' resource for squashing any dissenting opinions regarding what is and what is not a dupe.