aaaaagh

>> ^Constitutional_Patriot:
freaky bald guy scares me.. aaaaagh!!!
Seriously they both make valid points.


Both make valid points? Her only points were that she 1. sold an airplane on ebay 2. was against the bridge to nowhere 3. is against corruption 4. her opponent is a sexist

1. The plane was bought for $2.7 million and sold on ebay for $2.1 million, so $600,000 loss right there. The state makes $62,492.79 payments on it each quarter, and it seats up to nine. When not in use by the governor, it was used to shuttle inmates. Sarah Palin flies commercial--most likely business class which is what, a couple grand a seat, especially on last minute bookings? So to fly herself and her family/aides around with business class is probably $5,000-10,000 a flight. If she flies mores than 6 times a quarter she is costing the state money. The reality was that the plane was described: "You can't stand up in it, and the bathroom is basically a port-a-potty. You dare not use it." Fine, if she wants to prevent taxpayer waste, but how about doing a cost analysis before you sell a plane for a $600,000 loss your first day in office?

2. "Last year, Palin announced she was stopping state work on the controversial project, earning her admirers from earmark critics and budget hawks from around the nation. The move also thrust her into the spotlight as a reform-minded newcomer.
The state, however, never gave back any of the money that was originally earmarked for the Gravina Island bridge, said Weinstein and Elerding.
In fact, the Palin administration has spent "tens of millions of dollars" in federal funds to start building a road on Gravina Island that is supposed to link up to the yet-to-be-built bridge, Weinstein said."

3. "Palin is under investigation to determine whether she pressured and then fired the state police chief in July because he refused to dismiss her former brother-in-law. At the time, the governor's younger sister was involved in a bitter divorce and child custody dispute with the man, a state trooper. A bipartisan committee of the state legislature voted unanimously to hire a retired prosecutor to investigate. His report is due in October.”"

4. The argument that Carville is sexist because he is questioning the credentials of a woman is insulting and sexist itself, especially when he brings up another woman who he thinks is more qualified.

All I see here is a vice presidential candidate who is woefully ignorant and already corrupt with what little power she has as a governor in Alaska. Do you even know her education, or her grades in college? Christ, she has BA in journalism from the University of Idaho and you want to elect her as next in line to president?

I really don't get why you want your doctors, lawyers, and scientists to finish in the top of their class after 7-8 years of schooling. Why you wouldn't dare fly on a plane, drive in a car, or ride on a boat designed by someone without a phd or masters degree--yet you will elect people to run your entire lives who are at the bottom of their class and hold a completely irrelevant or non-demanding degree.

what point does she make that you find valid?

>> ^Constitutional_Patriot:
freaky bald guy scares me.. aaaaagh!!!
Seriously they both make valid points.

freaky bald guy scares me.. aaaaagh!!!

Seriously they both make valid points.