search results matching tag: T2
» channel: motorsports
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (52) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (83) |
Videos (52) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (1) | Comments (83) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Savage Messiah - Helen Mirren is extremeley NSFW
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by oritteropo.
Ruin - Post-Apocalyptic Short CGI Film
Science fiction can justify anything because almost anything IS possible. Suspension of disbelief plays too much into our own environment and timeline -- think about your own life as a stage play 400 years ago and MAYBE you'll consider suspending it a bit more.
His hands glow when he touches a mobile device, so for crying out loud, maybe he has extra signals planted in his brain (via nanotech) to provide additional motor control via WiFi, thus steering the motorcycle with one hand. I just listened to a PhD in bioengineering at Wonder Con say that the idea of creating new signals in the brain for additional limb control is not so far fetched. ("Science in Science Fiction" panel by the authors of this book.)
However, lack of exposition in any shape or form does not work for me -- it's just fantasy at that point. I don't need to be eviscerated by constant exposition, but I need to at least know the ground rules. I felt like this was a subpar combination of Advent Children, the T2 motorcycle chase scene and every Half Life chase scene. More stimulation for my brains PLZ.
(On a side note: BUT! it was good fun and was made to display technical skill, not simply to be judged by a group of non-industry laymen, so upvote because the team who made this has TALENT.)
TDS: "It's Not About Me" sez Sarah Palin
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Boise_Lib.
"Building 7" Explained
>> ^quantumushroom:
Occam asks: Why would the demolitioninjas collapse the building in an orderly manner that would arouse the suspicions of conspiracy theorists (and 1500 construction experts)? Why didn't they wire the building so it would fall over?
>> ^marinara:
Let's say WT7 had 20 columns holding up 47 floors (that's big). So these big ass columns get pushed around by by the "flooring under heat expansion" and then the other 20 ginormous columns fail instantly, and the whole thing goes down.
If one column can bring down WT7, it wasn't a skyscraper, it was a deathtrap.
You're mis-wielding the Razor. 1) The construction of T1/T2, and I assume 7-- steel-structured buildings in the old WTC site were such that they *would* impolode in the face of structural failure, not fall over. this limits casualties from outside the buildings. 2) The assumption that there are demoninjas necessitates the sub-assumption of the fact that demonninjas do not care what conspirators think, because conspirators will not be able to prove anything, because the ninjas are ninjas. 3) Because, in theory, the demoninjas are making so much money off of this that risking the ire of 1500+ construction experts, demo experts, engineers, and internet users isn't nearly reason enough to stop them taking the risk.
Can I just say... (I lived a few short blocks away in NYC at the time of the collapse. And I am a truther of sorts.) ...I'd like to stop the idea that conspiracy "nuts" are akin to religious zealots, suffer from some kind of mania, think that Illuminati lizards control the world, etc. The government's official story is BOTH a conspiracy (religious nuts in a cave in Afghanistan conspired to crash two planes into two of the largest structures in the financial capital of the west) and a theory (there has been no trial, there is very little hard evidence, there was no comprehensive official investigation, and both the Commission and NIST reports were produced by government institutions or congressionally appointed committee, and neither were conclusive- both were, in the end, speculative.
Trails of Tarnation: Ants!
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Barseps.
Terminator 2 Hand Drawn Animation
I'm impressed with the time-lapse meta-art setup but the rotoscoping of T2 is rather crap.
MythBusters - Methane Gas Column
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by critical_d.
What I Am Legend would have looked like with non-CG monsters
>> ^kceaton1:
>> ^AnimalsForCrackers:
>> ^kceaton1:
I consider the best creature ever to be the Alien. No CGI. The damn thing elicits fear.
Less is more!
I think Cameron's Terminator 2 is a good example of shrewd use of CGI where absolutely needed and no more. Watching the 'making of' stuff for T2, I was amazed at how things that I thought were obvious CGI were actually not.
Terminator 2 was awesome. Another good use was Jurassic Park. Man, that was one hell of an experience in theaters (both were).
Another more recent movie that has judicious but totally appropriate use of CGI effects is the Swedish vampire movie Let The Right One In.
When you're watching it, you don't really expect to see well done CGI effects (at least I didn't) so, when the effects are presented it has more of an impact, imo. Maybe it's because they don't promote it as an CGI effects laden movie, which it really isn't anyway. But, when you went to see Terminator 2, most likely you were going to see what cool CGI effects they did. I know I was. Same thing with Jurassic Park, we all went to see the dinosaurs. I was enthralled by both but, nowadays I prefer more subtle CGI.
What I Am Legend would have looked like with non-CG monsters
>> ^AnimalsForCrackers:
>> ^kceaton1:
I consider the best creature ever to be the Alien. No CGI. The damn thing elicits fear.
Less is more!
I think Cameron's Terminator 2 is a good example of shrewd use of CGI where absolutely needed and no more. Watching the 'making of' stuff for T2, I was amazed at how things that I thought were obvious CGI were actually not.
Terminator 2 was awesome. Another good use was Jurassic Park. Man, that was one hell of an experience in theaters (both were).
What I Am Legend would have looked like with non-CG monsters
>> ^kceaton1:
I consider the best creature ever to be the Alien. No CGI. The damn thing elicits fear.
Less is more!
I think Cameron's Terminator 2 is a good example of shrewd use of CGI where absolutely needed and no more. Watching the 'making of' stuff for T2, I was amazed at how things that I thought were obvious CGI were actually not.
Inspired Ideas for a Sustainable Future
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.
Machine Malfunctions - Ejects White Hot Metal
One step closer to Ghostbusters!
Coalition Of The Willing (Animated Short on Global Warming)
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by geo321.
Now This is Happening
Tags for this video have been changed from 'black widow, micheal jackson, superman, ironman, T2, stop motion' to 'black widow, michael jackson, superman, ironman, T2, stop motion' - edited by calvados
Laura Ingraham is doing it LIVE!
The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.