Come to think of it, if he had any math skill, he should have memorized his ONE square.. .how hard can that be. I can't see adding +4 to a number is worth selling a book. Just smoke and mirrors, and he is retarded too. Can't even memorize 16 numbers.

"if you're going to bomb women and children, don't be surprised when you're treated like a chew toy for intel."

By that argument we shouldn't be surprised if WE'RE treated like "intel chew toys". Personally I'm not saying we should or we shouldn't, it's a complex issue that should be debated openly and seriously. But let's just call a spade a spade and eliminate all the smoke and mirrors.
"Terrorists represent no country and have no rights under any system of laws"
If that's true, then why did we need the "Military Commission Act" which gives the president the "legal" ability to declare anyone a "military combatant"?

Interesting....O'Reily's contention is that we were wrong to invade Iraq. However now that we are there "winning is going to make things better". However he goes on to say that 'he's not Carnak, he can't say what the future holds'. But he just said 'winning would make things better'. In all this dialog about Iraq from the left, what I never here is a definition of 'winning'. When someone can define for me what they mean by 'winning' maybe I'll consider the validity of the arguments. Until then however it's just more smoke and mirrors.