search results matching tag: OJ

» channel: motorsports

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (30)     Sift Talk (2)     Blogs (2)     Comments (152)   

GLaDOS guest stars on Star Trek

Bill Maher ~ New Rules Closing (July 8th 2011)

Yogi says...

Also I think Bill Maher doesn't really understand innocent until proven guilty. Everyone can thank the cops that get several phone calls from a guy claiming to have found a babies skull and they didn't bother investigating it. Just like the OJ verdict blame the cops for being stupid.

Colbert Report: Formidable Opponent - Pakistan

Stephen Fry - Bullet Question

Star Trek Nemesis is the Final Nail in the Space Coffin

Banksy unmasked?

Oh, Four Tuna

King Geek creates Highest level of Geek Science Poetry

Sagemind says...

You woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning didn't you - You just may need a fresh glass of OJ to pull out of that stupor I for one, *promote the acceptance of some good natured nerd-humor and enjoy the fun to which he and the audience are having

>> ^jmzero:


So, to do "nerd" humor the plan is to avoid anything actually nerdy. Stick to the most often recycled bits of pop culture and pop science, mix in some clumsy, senseless double entendres so that people know when to laugh, and you're good to go.

Japanese Water Bottle Jetpack - Great invention

Uppercut: Silicon Valley Fight Club

BMW Short Film - The Chosen

Hymn to the Sacred Body of the Universe - Spoken word poem

'Mutiny' Over Pot

kronosposeidon says...

Jury nullification is a mixed bag at best. Back in the "good old days" when black people were being lynched, if any of the killers were actually brought to trial they were often found not guilty by all white juries. Those are probably the most obvious examples. The criminal trial of the cops who beat Rodney King and the OJ Simpson trial are often cited as cases of jury nullification as well. I'm sure others could cite more examples, but it's not necessary because we all know it happens.

This is not to say that I think jury nullification is always bad. In the above examples the crimes were assault and murder, which most would agree are crimes that should be punished. It is just to punish those who deliberately harm or kill. But in the cases of "crimes" that aren't crimes at all, like marijuana possession, or soliciting prostitution, or playing the numbers, etc, I would wholeheartedly embrace jury nullification. I believe laws against pot usage, prostitution, and gambling are unjust, so jury nullification is perfect in those instances.

I know many lawyers and legal scholars think that jury nullification in any form is a perversion of justice. They'll say that if citizens don't like the laws then they need to tell their legislators to rewrite them, and we should NOT be changing the laws in the jury room. But I don't care. I still have my free will. With a SNAP of a couple neurons I nullify all their arguments. >> ^Trancecoach:

Jury Nullification is the great gift to our legal system. It's too bad more jurors don't know about it or exercise their right to implement it.

The Trunk Monkey

Money Money Money -Gettin Money With a Mouse and a Wacom Pen



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon