*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

I remember being a junior coder in a place that prefixed variable names with their type. I had an often-checked boolean (bol) variable that said whether an OCX control was loaded, and feeling grumpy one day I just called it bolOcx. It made me smile each time I saw it, and my co-workers appreciated it too.

When the project was done the client asked to inspect the source code. I like to think they noticed it and saw the funny side of it, but I was definitely nervous handing it over.

A great scene and very insipiring, but I quite like this counter-argument (about 3-5 minutes from 34:00 in, but the whole video is good if you have the time)

I did this in my junior high/middle school's typing class with Apple 2s. I ran the typing tutor's demo and typed fast and classmates were in awe. And then, I stopped typing to prank them.

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

*backup=[...snipped...]

Who told you he’s a star witness? He’s what’s called a “corroborating witness”. Another inconvenient fact you got wrong. No wonder you ijits are always so mad.

As in his civil trials, Trump is the prosecution’s star witness through his business records, which document the crimes thoroughly….more thoroughly than anyone expected thanks to his cohorts not trusting him and recording or documenting the crimes and keeping those records as protection.

What are you trying to say? You failed again.
Are you attempting to dismiss the information about another $500 million Trump bribe because I didn’t spoon feed you articles you could then summarily dismiss because they aren’t maga propaganda outlets, and you are incapable of typing “Saudis fund kushner hotel” into google? Or are you saying my well thought out and presented factual and informative post was gibberish to you because some words had over 4 letters? 😂
Last time I spoon feed you, infant. Learn how to spell so you can search for yourself. Open wide, here comes the Choo-choo

https://www.newsweek.com/jared-kushner-faces-backlash-over-new-luxury-hotel-1901668

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/politics/kushner-serbia-hotel.html

https://www.bisnow.com/national/news/hotel/serbia-approves-500m-development-project-for-company-affiliated-with-jared-kushner-124318

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-03-15/trump-son-in-law-jared-kushner-s-saudi-backed-firm-eyes-balkan-deals

It's interesting how this guy mis represents the Trump case.

He repeatedly says there was no evidence and that it's really hard to disprove something that someone just says about you. "He said/she said".

Of course that's not how the case went at all.

Carrol told a couple of friends about the encounter immediately after it, so she corroborating witnesses that confirmed under oath that she had talked to them about the event 30 years ago.

Trump lied and said he would never treat women badly, that he never met Carrol, and that she wasn't his type.

Carrol's team proved that they had met (pictures and people's testimony) and Trump misidentified Carrol as his ex wife in a picture which was used to show that she physically was his type. The Access Hollywood secret audio was used with other evidence to show that Trump had bragged about treating women badly.

Last but not least Carrol offered a stained dress like Monica Lewinski that could be tested if only Trump would offer his DNA. Guess what? Trump would not offer his DNA to attempt a match.

The great part about the case here is that it appears Democrats actually hold each other to the laws instead of just obstructing or using their positions to try and get high profile people off scott free.

Very good, kids. Now for lesson two just follow this nice man playing drums.