search results matching tag: Chelsea Handler
» channel: motorsports
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.001 seconds
- 1
Videos (13) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (14) |
- 1
Videos (13) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (0) | Comments (14) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver: Wage Gap
I have a question. How much does John Oliver make compared to Chelsea Handler?
shouldn't they make exactly the same amount?
Or we could even compare how much he makes compared to every other person who works as a talking head at his network...shouldn't they all make exactly the same amount? I doubt they do.
How about NBC, which hired Chelsea Clinton? Did she make more money because of her last name? You betcha.
Oliver should stick to showing monkey videos, at least they are legit.
Conan O'Brien and Chelsea's Nude Shower Fight!
Ahhhh... Ok... I'm watching this without having watched the Chelsea Handler/Sandra Bullock Nude Shower Fight Scene first.
Context is everything.
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
*length=2:15
Original title:
Jewess Chelsea Handler Does Howard Stern Type Libertine National TV Sex Skit With Her Staff see text
The fix is the same embed, they've just updated their codes.
Russell Brand Hilarious on Chelsea Lately
There's not one bit of Chelsea Handler that I like.
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Chelsea Handler, sexual assault, tv, nice, noodle, boop' to 'Chelsea Handler, sexual assault, tv, bewbs, nice, noodle, boop' - edited by calvados
evil_disco_man (Member Profile)
:-D !
In reply to this comment by evil_disco_man:
*promote
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
Chelsea Handler photos
Chelsea Lately Interview: Tricia Helfer (Battlestar)
Ugh.. uuuuggh, I can't fucking stand Chelsea Handler's voice.
"i'm like totally was on Leno too, and was hit on by William Shatner and I was like 'no way' *snaps finger" JUST DIE.
Tricia Helfer is all sorts of cool though.
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
>> ^HadouKen24:
>> ^Don_Juan:
Where did we go wrong? By going mainly for visual sexual stimuli in our magazines. By going for primarily verbal stimuli, women's mags have the advantage of being relatively safe around young children--either they can't read, or they don't have the context (frequently) to understand what's going on.
You have to take the time to read for the stimuli aimed at women, whereas one only need a pair of eyes and a brain reasonably functional at interpreting visual images to ingest the stimuli aimed at men.
Yes indeed, sex is yet another area where the industrious efficiency of men shows our consistent superiority to the energy-wasting, inefficient methods of the weaker sex.
(To those who don't get the ironic barb in the above, one of us is stupid. There's no telling whether it's you or me.)
Fail.
I'll tell you why:
Yes, men's magazines have barely clothed women on them. However, there are numerous women's magazines at the checkout that feature women in bikinis - like Shape or Women's health. So no, women's magazines are no no more "safe" then Men's.
(I'm referring to Stuff, Maxim and FHM)
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
Tags for this video have been changed from 'Chelsea Handler, sexual assult, tv' to 'Chelsea Handler, sexual assault, tv, nice, noodle, boop' - edited by calvados
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
>> ^HadouKen24:
Where did we go wrong? By going mainly for visual sexual stimuli in our magazines. By going for primarily verbal stimuli, women's mags have the advantage of being relatively safe around young children--either they can't read, or they don't have the context (frequently) to understand what's going on.
You have to take the time to read for the stimuli aimed at women, whereas one only need a pair of eyes and a brain reasonably functional at interpreting visual images to ingest the stimuli aimed at men.
Mmm, this is some good pop psychology crap. To prepubescent children, a half-naked woman/man doesn't mean more than a harlequin novel. Yes they understand the words, yes they see the nakedness, but they don't assign sexual meaning to these stimuli by themselves, at least not anything they are conscious of or can act on. They have to be told what to think of it, and every Dr. Phil and Reverent Nutjob is eager to have his say. And the worst you can do isn't showing them some naked pictures or an article talking about sex, but to tell them it's wrong or unnatural to see/read it and have feelings about it, feelings that they don't even have yet: you're training them to think as wrong something they will unconsciously seek and have an urge for later, namely "sex" (in all its forms). You can't help it, they won't be able to help it, and trying to shield them from it is idiotic at best and criminally negligent at worst. What is even worst is preaching prudishness and then buying the worst magazines: not Playboy where girls are paid to be naked, but magazines where girls are half-naked to sell you something. The first is simple prostitution (consumption), whereas the second is akin to pimping (exploitation). You're telling them exploiting women/men is O.K. if you're hypocrital about it.
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
>> ^Don_Juan:
Yo! And at the supermarket checkout, waiting in line, what magazines are displayed? Three out of four blatently advertise sexual articles for women's consumption. If they were articles for men's consumption they would NOT be displayed! Where did we go wrong guys? Larry Flint - DO SOMETHING!!!
Where did we go wrong? By going mainly for visual sexual stimuli in our magazines. By going for primarily verbal stimuli, women's mags have the advantage of being relatively safe around young children--either they can't read, or they don't have the context (frequently) to understand what's going on.
You have to take the time to read for the stimuli aimed at women, whereas one only need a pair of eyes and a brain reasonably functional at interpreting visual images to ingest the stimuli aimed at men.
Yes indeed, sex is yet another area where the industrious efficiency of men shows our consistent superiority to the energy-wasting, inefficient methods of the weaker sex.
(To those who don't get the ironic barb in the above, one of us is stupid. There's no telling whether it's you or me.)
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
>> ^Debacle:
>> ^Sagemind:
I have noticed though how careful I have to be as a male in an office of 12 other women
What's going on here?
Sounds like my group a while ago. 4 gals + me (male). DOH. However, they're not my types.
Chelsea Handler sexually assaults her staff
>> ^Sagemind:
I have noticed though how careful I have to be as a male in an office of 12 other women
What's going on here?