Yeah, it's a dupe. I'm not misinformed, thanks. http://www.videosift.com/video/Now-THATs-a-Big-Mouth

*Discard
I believe I have yet to be wrong on calling dupe...

I've yet to see or meet a church leader who isn't a bit crazy; this guy just has a big mouth too.

Yo go girl, I saw the rabble you wanted to swat, a frikkin proby with a big mouth and a tiny head!!! More Power t6o CalamityKate!!
*quality

"I'll give an example. Lets take a dramatic example i.e. homicide."

It figures that Gorgonheap would compare smoking marijuana with homocide.

It's so in keeping with his usual load of big-mouthed horse shit.

"No one's gonna sit through this whole thing."

Especially if they're conservative big mouths who never say anything that has a basis in reality.

How does letting I'm-a-Dinner-Jacket, a big-mouthed terrorist tyrant, continue to talk trash benefit the safety and well-being of his own people, as well as the world?

Could you defend your argument for pacifism?

"...egotistical liberal with weird ears and a big mouth."

Oooo...I stand corrected.

Wit like yours is truly something for the ages.

"You know, BillOreilly, you're just like Stephen Colbert...only without the humor and the wit."

I know you've been itching for a response from me, so I'll give you one.

Son, Steven Colbert is a yellow-dog, no-good, not-funny, witless, egotistical liberal with weird ears and a big mouth. There, ya happy now?

I think that Elizabeth is right. I'm sorry to say but Rosie has a big mouth and doesn't know when she needs to keep it shut. I hate Rosie...and I honestly think that she is nothing more then a Rating monger....well off to watch the second part LOL

And yet Bush's kollij grades were HIGHER than Kerry's and why the latter won't release them to the public!

BTW, must remember to send Kerry's big mouth a Thank You card for cinching November for the R's.

HA HA HA HA HA!

Ah how soon we forget. Well, at least some people choose to forget.

When the War on Terror started, Bush went to Congress to ask for funding. With only 1 or 2 exceptions, everyone voted in favor of it. In fact, the 'left' couldn't wait to stampede to the microphones saying how much they agreed with him.

FF to the War in Iraq to topple Saddam. Again, Bush passed resolutions at the U.N. which authorized him to proceed. If they were so dead-set that it was an 'illegal' war, they certainly didn't vote that way. Neither did left-wing politicians in Congress. They all voted to authorize it (with 1 or 2 exceptions), and indeed they wanted TWO debates over the resolution (which they got) so there would be no mistake that they voted in favor of it. One notable vote in the matter was John "F'n" Kerry, who 'voted for it - before he voted against it.'.

FF to Nov. 2005 (just last year). John Murtha, who voted for the war, ran screaming to every camera he could jump in front of that we should leave Iraq. Left-wing politicos had been saying so for months - thinking the war was 'too hard'. They used such rhetoric as "illegal war", "unjustified", "imperialistic", "unauthorized" and so on and so forth, praying to a God they didn't believe in that no one in the country would remember they voted for it in the first place.

If the Dems are so hell-fire sure that the war is wrong, illegal, unjustified and ignoble - why don't they vote to cut off funding? There's all sorts of stuff they could do to sabotage the war - it they REALLY think it's wrong. And you people? Why not write your congressman and demand that they cut off funding for the war? Or demand that we 'bring the boys home'?

Oh yes - Murtha. He was so proud of his new courageous resolve that we must leave Iraq. Finally, the Republican leadership had enough. They introduced a resolution - which would have granted the Dems everything they CLAIMED they wanted. A resolution to withdraw from Iraq. Here was their big chance for the Dems to put their votes where their big mouths were.

The vote came in November 2005. Only THREE Dems voted in favor of the "cut and run" bill. Again - if they are so sure of their position - why won't they vote to quit? Or cut off funding? Or any of the other measures which would bring their 'war is illegal' rhetoric to it's logical conclusion? For that matter - the UN. If they're so sure it's an illegal war - why don't they vote to condemn Bush as a war criminal?

Because that's all they've got - hot air. They know that they themselves voted for the war. They know at the UN they passed the resolutions to authorize it. Because the war was not, is not, and never will be illegal or unauthorized. It was sanctiond by the Dems, the UN, everyone - except the terrorists and Saddam.

Time for another Rush Limbaugh profundity. In a parody of "Do-Run-Run", they wrote a song which outlined the situation so well the Dem's linguini-spined position:

Kennedy: They had a bona-fide and our hearts stood still!
We do run run run, we do run run!
Murtha demanded that we pull out up on capital hill!
We do run run run, we do run run!
Yeah, up on capital hill! At hill, we had to vote on a bill!
That's when we ran away! We do run run run, we do run run!
Thanks a lot Murtha!

I know just what you're thinking that we don't have a spine!
We do run run run, we do run run!
I've got one around here somewhere!
Clinton: I loaned out mine!
We do run run run, we do run run!
Yeah, we got no spine! That's why we're behind!
And if you stand up to us - we do run run run, we do run run!

Kennedy:
They picked on me at 7 on the network news!
We do run run run run, we do run run!
Called us on the carpet to defend our point of view!
We do run run run, we do run run!
Yeah, we said Bush lied!
I never meant it personally, I just improvised!
I, uh, think it's time to run away again!
We do run run run, we do run run!
Over here - this way! Uh, that's not EXACTLY what I meant!
We're, uh, we're all for the troops!
We, uh, we never said withdraw RIGHT NOW!
Just a timetable! Or an estimated timetable....!

The ponytailed doofus is Joe Redner, local strip club owner in Tampa, FL. He recently decided he was a finook since being a faig might afford him some kind of discrimination protection. Regardless, he got what he deserved for being a big mouth.

More a question of etiquette or form than features or functions:
1) Is it poor or proper form to vote for a vid that one submitted? I always vote immediately after submitting a vid, essentially giving it its first vote. But I notice some of us do not vote for their own vids, possibly thinking it poor form (though I cannot be sure of this). Consistently applied over time, these differing approaches can create a significant discrepancy in total votes a user has accrued. So, what should be considered "proper" form? (or perhaps I should just keep my big mouth shut and let those who don't vote for their own submissions live with it) (oh, too late)

2) More than once, I have found that vids I submitted have received "down" votes, and many times I have no idea why. It's clear many of us apply different standards or seek different qualities when we cast our vote (e.g., some of us may weigh production values highly, some may consider cultural significance, others may not care as long as it's funny, or cute or whatever, etc..) But I always want to know why certain vids get a negative vote.. in part because I think I take it more personally when it's negative. I know I can sometimes be somewhat whimsical when I vote a "+". No harm done if I vote for something just because it makes me smile, say. But I am much more judicious when distributing "-" votes, so when a vid I suggest receives one I'd like to encourage commentary. What factors led to the vote?