Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
nanrodThat's nuclear, not nucular.
Janussays...Yeah, I scrolled down to comment on the repeated nuke-yoo-lar pronunciation as well. That sort of glaring goof makes it even more difficult to take their channel seriously.
That's nuclear, not nucular.
MilkmanDansays...I agree, hard to get past "nuke-yoo-lar".
But also, I think more information is necessary to justify their claims about results of a hypothetical India vs Pakistan nuclear war with 100 warheads dropped "in anger" so to speak.
Google search suggests that there have been more than 2000 nuclear tests, 520 atmospheric, from 1945 to today. Would the increased particulate dust and debris from being fired on generally populated areas really be enough to make 100 of those warheads have a drastically greater effect than the 520 atmospheric tests that have already happened?
Seems possible, but I dunno. Expanding on that further would be interesting.
siftbotMoving this video to Mordhaus's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
eric3579*promote
siftbotPromoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by eric3579.
littledragon_79
ForgedRealitysays...Omg I can't listen to this and all the "nukular" shit. >_<
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.