Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
CrushBugsays...Spittin' FIRE!
ChaosEnginesays...And how did Breitbart respond?
By attacking the messenger
So there are so many things wrong with those fucking nazi assholes stupid argument, I don't know where to start.
Let's see:
sexism? check! She's just a pretty girl....
Ad hominem? check!
Being completely wrong about climate change? check!
oh and my favourite part... they attempted to coin a new logical fallacy... in their words "argumentum ad puellam pulchram. (aka the Argument from a Pretty Girl)".
Except the fucking morons can't even get the latin right.
"Argumentum ad" is arguing TO not FROM, i.e. they are attacking a "pretty girl", not being attacked by.
They inadvertently exposed their own fallacy while trying to make up a new one.
Morons....
draeborsays...Kait Parker = Badass
CaptainObvioussays...She may be pretty, but that brain downright sexy. The CPU is strong with this one.
moduloussays...So science rapists can be swayed by pretty faces so much that they have to remind each other to be wary?
Jeez, why didn't anyone say so. Let's hire women with PhDs to communicate science globally!
Paybacksays...Holy Crap, that Delingport guy looks so stereotypically like a douchebag it's scary...
And how did Breitbart respond?
dagsays...Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
Sift of the week!
deathcowsays...Denying this is hilarious. Making the case will become progressively more difficult.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.