Her excessive facial contractions give me anxiety.

This is pretty awesome (and very detailed).

It'd be pretty sick if this could be built into a real-time camera where you can visually see wifi signals around you.

Fascinating. I had no idea.

Here's the original video:

They earn A MILLION DOLLARS MORE????

oh, in their lifetimes.

*spammer

That's worth two in the bush, just so everyone is aware.

Man you're really killing it, Mordhaus!

Loving all the awesome content you're pumping in.

(And fear not, your Galaxy warez are a'comin!)

Sweetness.

Woohoo! Congrats on reaching 1000 stars!

Phenomenal achievement for a phenomenal member of the Sift community.

♥

*spammer

Indeed.

The more I think about this video, the more pissed off I get.

As if anyone would really hear a song on the radio and think to themselves, "I can't stand this song because there's no way that singer would be able to sing it live the exact same way!"

This guy's a fucking asshole.

A good analogue would be considering a film that is turned into a stage show... or an animated movie that is made into a life-action flick.

You can't do the same things on stage versus film, nor in film versus animation, but that doesn't really have anything to do with the overall "purpose" of the entertainment/story.

Interesting, but his whole premise is "the purpose of a song is to be performed," and that's a rather subjective, and I'd argue invalid, statement.

My natural reaction to all of this is: "So what?"

The purpose of a song isn't to be performed live, it's to make money through entertaining, and the purpose of performing live isn't to sing identically to a recording, but to make money through entertaining.

How do current self-driving systems (e.g., Tesla) deal with this?

Pretty sure Uber takes a "meh, just run people over" approach given recent events.

What's this "truth" advertised in the title? It implies it's going to reveal something widely believed about wireless charging is false.