oOOOooo! I'm not very observant, am I? Now I feel compelled and obligated to vote it up. Especially because I voted for the shorter, much more puny version.

In reply to this comment by jonny:
It's not a dupe. The original is less than 2 minutes, this one is over 6.
So how about going and voting for mine now?

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
DUPLICATE:

http://www.videosift.com/video/ronald-nancy-reagan-explain-why-drugs-are-GOOD

I do what I can.

In reply to this comment by gorgonheap:
This was on the sift before but apparently it is now MIA. good pickup.

Sh... sh... Shuddup! Doo doo head!

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:

But why bother right? Watch Fox News and let them make your opinions for you

Leslie Parrish:

"Star Trek" .... Lieutenant Carolyn Palamas (1 episode, 1967)
... aka Star Trek: TOS (USA: promotional abbreviation)
... aka Star Trek: The Original Series (USA: informal title)

Internet Movie Database www.imdb.com

http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/palamas.htm

Episode: TOS 033 - Who Mourns for Adonais?

In reply to this comment by swampgirl:
The woman in this I'm sure was in an episode of Star Trek (TOS) Someone tell me which one?

When it comes to my standards, morals, ethics, and ideals you better believe I'm "staunch" and "stubborn". I've seen and heard enough by now to know which side of the line I want to stand.

It's not my fault that I could take 10 - 15 excerpts from the Bin Laden transcripts and 10 - 15 lines from a Far Left Blog and you wouldn't be able to tell me which was which.

BTW: Good luck with that "Selective" Information Dissemination.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
My sole interest is information dissemination.

But if you must know, I disagree with those comments because its telling when we let Bin Laden let us turn against one another politically, his usage of democrats and Iraq does two things, first placate the Democrats into not arguing for a withdrawl and feed into Bush's desire to sustain a war in Iraq thus letting him ride out in the sunset in January 2009 and hand this war over to which ever candidate gets elected.

The criticism of equaiting the Left with Bin Laden thus means anyone on the left is a homicidal luncatic, which is right considering we had nothing but lies about the war perpetuall from the white house. Who only gladdly accept the flak war between the left and right as it lets them go about their business undettered, mainly by limiting consititutional freedoms, escalating a war based on false pretences.

You have proven to be a staunch at times stubborn supporter of the right wing. So it's not suprising you pose this question to me.

In reply to this comment by deedub81:
I just wanted to clarify the reason why you have a problem with Brooks:

Is it because he calls the Far Left Bloggers "childish people", or that he points out the fact that Bin Laden is quoting them in his most recent video(therefore, Bin Laden obviously reads and agrees with said bloggers)?

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
CNN did the same thing equating progressives with terrorists.

I just wanted to clarify the reason why you have a problem with Brooks:

Is it because he calls the Far Left Bloggers "childish people", or that he points out the fact that Bin Laden is quoting them in his most recent video(therefore, Bin Laden obviously reads and agrees with said bloggers)?

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
CNN did the same thing equating progressives with terrorists.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Man-In-A-Car-Wash

It's dead. Hurry!