Depends on what you're into. In terms of tenderness, Filet Mignon basically trumps because it's insanely soft, even when cooked up to well-done.

If you want a flavourful steak, go for anything with a "Bone In". That would be a rib-eye, bone in rib steak, T-bone, etc. Typically they're more flavourful steaks because they tend to be "fattier", and fat = taste.

The "baseball" and "coulotte" steaks are typically beef for the sake of beef, usually not going to be the focus of your dish, it'll be something that gets topped off with blue cheese or garlic butter as another type of flavour.

Flank, Skirt, "hanger" and most other types of steaks are also not typically the focus of your meal, but will usually be cooked up for other parts of it. (Order steak fajitas at a restaurant? 90% chance it's one of these three steaks.)

The key factor to almost all of them though is marbleization, which refers to the amount of good fat that's weaved its way through the cut. It may look gross when raw because it's honestly like a buncha white shit on your steak but once that's cooked up that's where the flavour comes from.

My personal choice for a steak is the Bone-in wing steak. It's effectively a giant slice of prime rib roast that's been cooked up like a steak. Very tender, lots of flavour, and at the end, as long as you don't mind looking like a neanderthal, you can actually just chew the meat off the bone for some of the most tender / tasty steak you'll ever have.

I am in full agreement with this, having both been a bicycle commuter smashed up by an idiot driver, and being a car commuter nearly running down idiot cyclist disturbingly often (though to be fair, they're usually the wannabe bike messenger types who get a kick out of weaving through traffic and disregarding one-way streets and such).

If you're going to ride a bicycle in the street, you need to follow the traffic laws as though you were a slow car (this is, in fact, the law in most places). Otherwise you're just dangerously unpredictable. I do appreciate that there are occasional times when it's safer to bend the rules, but predictability really is the key.

http://videosift.com/video/Hugo-Weaving-General-Electric-vert is another Matrix commercial. I hope we will see more with other characters.

The physical skill of weaving foreign objects between his important inside bits is impressive, but why imply it's some kind of illusion? He is, as Ricky concisely points out, sticking a fucking needle through his arm.

The mediocre characters played by the Cracked cast let me pretend that I too could weave an endless sequence of riffs on popular culture into social criticism so witty that the entire Internet would want to hear it.

*doublepromote

When I was in Korea my family hired a moving company, and I got to witness this fine art in person. These guys are no joke. They are seriously skilled in their craft. And YES, they have redefined packing and moving into mater craft.

But for all the work they do and hours of training they've put in, they aren't paid nearly as enough as they should. It's like watching a City bus driver weaving the big bulky bus through jammed traffic and tight corners with finesse and precision, yet at the end of the day it's just another day at work for him.

Also keep in mind that in Asia there is no tipping culture, so they don't make any more money than their fixed pay. In Korean society it is in our tradition to serve the movers with a meal and a few beverages, but that's as far as getting anything extra from their job.

I have huge respects for what these guys do in Asia and I hope they get all the attention and the recognition they deserve.

Notice how the the small cable holders don't just spin in a circle but are transferred from wheel to wheel making a more effective weave.

I had a problem with this in just a conceptual way. First of all there's no way in hell the American government would let that stand for even a day, they'd destroy the entire fucking city and have no problem doing it. Which makes me wonder, couldn't we have it be two movies and have Bane own the city without it being a hostile takeover with guns and outward aggression? I mean Bane would be the strong man absolutely, but his handler would've done better to create a criminal utopia instead and try to drive it into the ground through corruption. You could make allusions to Chicago or Baltimore, it could get seriously deep.

Spreading it over two movies would be essential to tell a more complex and weaving tale. It would've been the greatest series of movies ever made if they had done it the hard way, I think they were just trying to get it done or something.

Thing is, if he starts at new deck order and uses "weave" shuffles then there can't be THAT much deviation. If you do a perfect weave, a,b,a,b etc then after 8 such shuffles you'll arrive back at new deck order. I mean ok, its hard to do a perfect weave, and weaving the cards the same way as somebody 4 or 5 times in a row is still small odds, but its still a lot larger odds than 1/52!

I guess what I'm saying is that you can't assume our shuffling techniques really truly randomise the order of the cards.

Staged I'd say.

Just before the jump you can see the Wide Receiver purposely diving to move out of the way as the Halfback approaches from behind. I assume everyone on the field is in on it as well. After the jump No. 22 is right there to tackle him but he purposely weaves away from the Halfback's direction and instead runs beside him as if he's chasing him.

Still, this is an incredible choreography.

agreed, Foster would play her good, looks similar from that view

Hugo Weaving could play Abbott

agreed, Foster would play her good, looks similar from that view

Hugo Weaving could play Abbott

That is pretty much exactly what I said, he does not have an ideology of his own except for the one he was spoon fed his entire life but when that fails he is just a business man and he can weave in and out of it as long as his writers queue him up for it. Romney is a total right winger though, when I have heard him being himself is when he is making vast generalizations with conviction... that is a staple for that sect of thought.

>> ^messenger:

This isn't about conservative/liberal. Te point is that Romney himself is nothing. He's not conservative. He's no liberal. He's just a politician out to get votes any way that he can. Nothing else.
"These are my principles! And if you don't like them, I have others.">> ^shagen454:
The problem with conservatives is that they are supposed to stay the same. Which is why most of them that never leave the farm are about just as good as the cows eating the feed and then they get all tangled up in the masses who have all of these opinions and culture... ITS SO CONFUSING being an elitist, rich piece of right wing turd.

I thought this video was about children who smoke. I've had many travels around Asia and it still surprises me to see young kids with better smoking technique than I had.

In Indonesia especially the kids had to support their habit by selling magazines and snacks in the middle of traffic. The busier the road the better. So they are literally smoking a cigarette while weaving through "rush hour" traffic trying to get your attention while you are dodging 20 some motorcycles weaving around your vehicle.

I'm not sure what will kill them first, cancer, getting hit by a car or breathing in the terrible emissions from cars/motorcycles that have no emissions controls to speak of.